TriMas Corporation (TRS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TriMas Corporation (TRS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-19.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($847.32 Million) in one year. Explore how much of TriMas Corporation's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TriMas Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TriMas Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore TriMas Corporation total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TriMas Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TriMas Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TRS stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $117.45 Million | $779.49 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $63.78 Million | $656.88 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $88.16 Million | $658.71 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $72.57 Million | $653.17 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $134.22 Million | $672.79 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $127.41 Million | $609.63 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $75.60 Million | $495.22 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $129.32 Million | $480.07 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $120.06 Million | $489.18 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $80.47 Million | $551.93 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $62.54 Million | $623.11 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $123.40 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $87.61 Million | $751.37 Million | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $73.22 Million | $827.38 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $95.81 Million | $812.75 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $94.96 Million | $811.84 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $83.51 Million | $763.80 Million | ▲ +207.0% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $31.17 Million | $875.32 Million | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $64.97 Million | $919.50 Million | ▲ +368.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $15.88 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $29.89 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $42.62 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $41.36 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +252.7% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-25.11 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -124.1% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $75.98 Million | $744.74 Million | ▼ -99.7% |
| 2000 | 34.57x | $18.71 Million | $541.15K | ▲ +11524.3% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | $91.08 Million | $306.22 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 1995 | 0.24x | $66.25 Million | $277.69 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 1994 | 0.21x | $67.67 Million | $323.72 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | $50.10 Million | $319.28 Million | — |