TriMas Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TriMas Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. TriMas Corporation (TRS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $137.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($803.04 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of TriMas Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of TriMas Corporation (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of TriMas Corporation from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for TriMas Corporation across 30 annual periods. Check TriMas Corporation (TRS) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
TriMas Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
TriMas Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TriMas Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TriMas Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $117.45 Million | $779.49 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $63.78 Million | $656.88 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $88.16 Million | $658.71 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $72.57 Million | $653.17 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $134.22 Million | $672.79 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $127.41 Million | $609.63 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $75.60 Million | $495.22 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $129.32 Million | $480.07 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $120.06 Million | $489.18 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $80.47 Million | $551.93 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $62.54 Million | $623.11 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $123.40 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $87.61 Million | $751.37 Million | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $73.22 Million | $827.38 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $95.81 Million | $812.75 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $94.96 Million | $811.84 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $83.51 Million | $763.80 Million | ▲ +207.0% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $31.17 Million | $875.32 Million | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $64.97 Million | $919.50 Million | ▲ +368.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $15.88 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $29.89 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $42.62 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $41.36 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +252.7% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-25.11 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -124.1% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $75.98 Million | $744.74 Million | ▼ -99.7% |
| 2000 | 34.57x | $18.71 Million | $541.15K | ▲ +11524.3% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | $91.08 Million | $306.22 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 1995 | 0.24x | $66.25 Million | $277.69 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 1994 | 0.21x | $67.67 Million | $323.72 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | $50.10 Million | $319.28 Million | — |