TriMas Corporation (TRS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TriMas Corporation (TRS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-19.38 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($847.32 Million) in one year. See TRS cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TriMas Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TriMas Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of TriMas Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TriMas Corporation (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TriMas Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of TriMas Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $117.45 Million | $779.49 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $63.78 Million | $656.88 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $88.16 Million | $658.71 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $72.57 Million | $653.17 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $134.22 Million | $672.79 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $127.41 Million | $609.63 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $75.60 Million | $495.22 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2018 | 0.27x | $129.32 Million | $480.07 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2017 | 0.25x | $120.06 Million | $489.18 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $80.47 Million | $551.93 Million | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $62.54 Million | $623.11 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2014 | 0.12x | $123.40 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $87.61 Million | $751.37 Million | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $73.22 Million | $827.38 Million | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $95.81 Million | $812.75 Million | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2010 | 0.12x | $94.96 Million | $811.84 Million | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $83.51 Million | $763.80 Million | ▲ +207.0% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $31.17 Million | $875.32 Million | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $64.97 Million | $919.50 Million | ▲ +368.7% |
| 2006 | 0.02x | $15.88 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $29.89 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $42.62 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $41.36 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +252.7% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-25.11 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -124.1% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $75.98 Million | $744.74 Million | ▼ -99.7% |
| 2000 | 34.57x | $18.71 Million | $541.15K | ▲ +11524.3% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | $91.08 Million | $306.22 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 1995 | 0.24x | $66.25 Million | $277.69 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 1994 | 0.21x | $67.67 Million | $323.72 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | $50.10 Million | $319.28 Million | — |