Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $324.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.35 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Tractor Supply Company to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tractor Supply Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tractor Supply Company across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tractor Supply Company (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tractor Supply Company. Check Tractor Supply Company (TSCO) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $1.64 Billion | $8.35 Billion | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $1.42 Billion | $7.54 Billion | ▼ -0.5% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | $1.33 Billion | $7.04 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $1.36 Billion | $6.45 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $1.14 Billion | $5.76 Billion | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2020 | 0.27x | $1.39 Billion | $5.13 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $811.72 Million | $3.72 Billion | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2018 | 0.46x | $694.39 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2017 | 0.44x | $631.45 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2016 | 0.53x | $650.71 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2015 | 0.47x | $456.21 Million | $977.53 Million | ▼ -15.5% |
| 2014 | 0.55x | $409.18 Million | $741.01 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2013 | 0.51x | $333.68 Million | $656.50 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $378.30 Million | $681.83 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2011 | 0.43x | $254.14 Million | $586.54 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2010 | 0.42x | $222.61 Million | $530.23 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $215.32 Million | $497.64 Million | ▼ -7.4% |
| 2008 | 0.47x | $217.73 Million | $465.87 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2007 | 0.31x | $155.02 Million | $492.63 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2006 | 0.21x | $87.55 Million | $409.09 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2005 | 0.31x | $104.47 Million | $337.10 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2004 | 0.25x | $77.07 Million | $307.90 Million | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $63.91 Million | $240.82 Million | ▲ +29.9% |
| 2002 | 0.20x | $47.21 Million | $231.07 Million | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $46.80 Million | $157.19 Million | ▲ +418.8% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | $10.17 Million | $177.26 Million | ▲ +222.5% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | $-7.70 Million | $164.30 Million | ▼ -143.7% |
| 1998 | 0.11x | $15.50 Million | $144.60 Million | ▲ +350.5% |
| 1997 | -0.04x | $-5.10 Million | $119.20 Million | ▼ -120.3% |
| 1996 | 0.21x | $21.20 Million | $100.80 Million | ▲ +268.6% |
| 1995 | -0.12x | $-11.30 Million | $90.60 Million | ▼ -215.9% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $7.80 Million | $72.50 Million | ▲ +907.0% |
| 1993 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $93.60 Million | — |