180 Degree Capital Corp (TURN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
180 Degree Capital Corp (TURN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.41x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.01 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($2.85 Million) in one year. Explore TURN long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
180 Degree Capital Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for 180 Degree Capital Corp across 30 annual periods. Also explore 180 Degree Capital Corp total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for 180 Degree Capital Corp (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for 180 Degree Capital Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see 180 Degree Capital Corp (TURN) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.21x | $269.93K | $1.26 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 2023 | 1.35x | $1.29 Million | $952.79K | ▲ +154.3% |
| 2022 | -2.49x | $-3.50 Million | $1.41 Million | ▼ -63.4% |
| 2021 | -1.52x | $-7.34 Million | $4.83 Million | ▼ -3280.1% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $140.42K | $2.94 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2019 | 0.77x | $3.53 Million | $4.57 Million | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2018 | 2.16x | $4.35 Million | $2.02 Million | ▲ +156.2% |
| 2017 | -3.84x | $-11.84 Million | $3.08 Million | ▼ -455.8% |
| 2016 | 1.08x | $2.55 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +228.0% |
| 2015 | -0.84x | $-6.53 Million | $7.75 Million | ▼ -116.6% |
| 2014 | 5.07x | $12.36 Million | $2.44 Million | ▲ +1101.5% |
| 2013 | 0.42x | $995.92K | $2.36 Million | ▲ +106.3% |
| 2012 | -6.68x | $-23.74 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -310.9% |
| 2011 | -1.63x | $-7.55 Million | $4.65 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2010 | -2.40x | $-5.84 Million | $2.44 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2009 | -2.71x | $-5.28 Million | $1.95 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2008 | -1.98x | $-4.16 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -116.7% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | $-4.14 Million | $4.53 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2006 | -3.40x | $-14.96 Million | $4.40 Million | ▼ -1645.5% |
| 2005 | -0.19x | $-2.91 Million | $14.96 Million | ▲ +76.4% |
| 2004 | -0.83x | $-3.81 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2003 | -1.92x | $-6.59 Million | $3.43 Million | ▼ -968.5% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $1.92 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +135.5% |
| 2001 | -0.62x | $-9.57 Million | $15.35 Million | ▼ -450.3% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-1.30 Million | $11.51 Million | ▲ +46.3% |
| 1999 | -0.21x | $-2.47 Million | $11.69 Million | ▲ +60.6% |
| 1998 | -0.54x | $-1.50 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -850.0% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $400.00K | $5.60 Million | ▲ +113.8% |
| 1996 | -0.52x | $-1.40 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -114.6% |
| 1995 | 3.56x | $3.20 Million | $900.00K | — |