180 Degree Capital Corp (TURN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
180 Degree Capital Corp (TURN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.41x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.01 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($2.85 Million) in one year. See TURN financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
180 Degree Capital Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for 180 Degree Capital Corp across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 180 Degree Capital Corp (TURN) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for 180 Degree Capital Corp (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for 180 Degree Capital Corp. Check 180 Degree Capital Corp cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.21x | $269.93K | $1.26 Million | ▼ -84.1% |
| 2023 | 1.35x | $1.29 Million | $952.79K | ▲ +154.3% |
| 2022 | -2.49x | $-3.50 Million | $1.41 Million | ▼ -63.4% |
| 2021 | -1.52x | $-7.34 Million | $4.83 Million | ▼ -3280.1% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $140.42K | $2.94 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2019 | 0.77x | $3.53 Million | $4.57 Million | ▼ -64.2% |
| 2018 | 2.16x | $4.35 Million | $2.02 Million | ▲ +156.2% |
| 2017 | -3.84x | $-11.84 Million | $3.08 Million | ▼ -455.8% |
| 2016 | 1.08x | $2.55 Million | $2.37 Million | ▲ +228.0% |
| 2015 | -0.84x | $-6.53 Million | $7.75 Million | ▼ -116.6% |
| 2014 | 5.07x | $12.36 Million | $2.44 Million | ▲ +1101.5% |
| 2013 | 0.42x | $995.92K | $2.36 Million | ▲ +106.3% |
| 2012 | -6.68x | $-23.74 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -310.9% |
| 2011 | -1.63x | $-7.55 Million | $4.65 Million | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2010 | -2.40x | $-5.84 Million | $2.44 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2009 | -2.71x | $-5.28 Million | $1.95 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2008 | -1.98x | $-4.16 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -116.7% |
| 2007 | -0.91x | $-4.14 Million | $4.53 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2006 | -3.40x | $-14.96 Million | $4.40 Million | ▼ -1645.5% |
| 2005 | -0.19x | $-2.91 Million | $14.96 Million | ▲ +76.4% |
| 2004 | -0.83x | $-3.81 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2003 | -1.92x | $-6.59 Million | $3.43 Million | ▼ -968.5% |
| 2002 | 0.22x | $1.92 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +135.5% |
| 2001 | -0.62x | $-9.57 Million | $15.35 Million | ▼ -450.3% |
| 2000 | -0.11x | $-1.30 Million | $11.51 Million | ▲ +46.3% |
| 1999 | -0.21x | $-2.47 Million | $11.69 Million | ▲ +60.6% |
| 1998 | -0.54x | $-1.50 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -850.0% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $400.00K | $5.60 Million | ▲ +113.8% |
| 1996 | -0.52x | $-1.40 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -114.6% |
| 1995 | 3.56x | $3.20 Million | $900.00K | — |