Universal Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Electronics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Universal Electronics Inc (UEIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($124.37 Million) in one year. Check Universal Electronics Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Universal Electronics Inc (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Universal Electronics Inc from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Electronics Inc across 35 annual periods. Check Universal Electronics Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Universal Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Universal Electronics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Electronics Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see UEIC cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $23.63 Million | $127.81 Million | ▲ +112.3% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $14.82 Million | $170.25 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $25.19 Million | $176.95 Million | ▲ +207.2% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $10.93 Million | $235.76 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $40.28 Million | $234.40 Million | ▼ -53.9% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $73.39 Million | $196.99 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2019 | 0.29x | $85.26 Million | $289.76 Million | ▲ +569.8% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $12.86 Million | $292.64 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $13.79 Million | $354.88 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $49.10 Million | $240.53 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $26.09 Million | $237.31 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $63.47 Million | $147.45 Million | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $30.69 Million | $132.46 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | $43.54 Million | $128.67 Million | ▲ +219.0% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $14.80 Million | $139.50 Million | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $35.56 Million | $161.33 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $23.99 Million | $63.58 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 0.47x | $30.15 Million | $64.20 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | $19.94 Million | $49.04 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $17.21 Million | $44.39 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | $14.13 Million | $43.03 Million | ▲ +199.5% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $3.99 Million | $36.40 Million | ▼ -82.3% |
| 2003 | 0.62x | $19.24 Million | $31.00 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2002 | 0.96x | $16.18 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2001 | 1.31x | $19.72 Million | $15.00 Million | ▲ +169.0% |
| 2000 | 0.49x | $11.44 Million | $23.41 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 1999 | 1.15x | $17.48 Million | $15.24 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 1998 | 0.60x | $9.70 Million | $16.20 Million | ▲ +6746.3% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-200.00K | $22.20 Million | ▼ -101.5% |
| 1996 | 0.62x | $8.60 Million | $13.90 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 1995 | 0.39x | $7.70 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +173.6% |
| 1994 | -0.53x | $-13.40 Million | $25.50 Million | ▲ +81.6% |
| 1993 | -2.86x | $-34.60 Million | $12.10 Million | ▼ -681.0% |
| 1992 | -0.37x | $-6.70 Million | $18.30 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 1991 | -0.35x | $-2.20 Million | $6.20 Million | — |