Universal Electronics Inc (UEIC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Electronics Inc (UEIC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.13 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($134.55 Million) in one year. See Universal Electronics Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Electronics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Electronics Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore UEIC year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Electronics Inc (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Electronics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Universal Electronics Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.09x | $14.82 Million | $170.25 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $25.19 Million | $176.95 Million | ▲ +207.2% |
| 2022 | 0.05x | $10.93 Million | $235.76 Million | ▼ -73.0% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $40.28 Million | $234.40 Million | ▼ -53.9% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $73.39 Million | $196.99 Million | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2019 | 0.29x | $85.26 Million | $289.76 Million | ▲ +569.8% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $12.86 Million | $292.64 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $13.79 Million | $354.88 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $49.10 Million | $240.53 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $26.09 Million | $237.31 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $63.47 Million | $147.45 Million | ▲ +85.8% |
| 2013 | 0.23x | $30.69 Million | $132.46 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2012 | 0.34x | $43.54 Million | $128.67 Million | ▲ +219.0% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $14.80 Million | $139.50 Million | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $35.56 Million | $161.33 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2009 | 0.38x | $23.99 Million | $63.58 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 0.47x | $30.15 Million | $64.20 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2007 | 0.41x | $19.94 Million | $49.04 Million | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2006 | 0.39x | $17.21 Million | $44.39 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | $14.13 Million | $43.03 Million | ▲ +199.5% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $3.99 Million | $36.40 Million | ▼ -82.3% |
| 2003 | 0.62x | $19.24 Million | $31.00 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2002 | 0.96x | $16.18 Million | $16.78 Million | ▼ -26.6% |
| 2001 | 1.31x | $19.72 Million | $15.00 Million | ▲ +169.0% |
| 2000 | 0.49x | $11.44 Million | $23.41 Million | ▼ -57.4% |
| 1999 | 1.15x | $17.48 Million | $15.24 Million | ▲ +91.5% |
| 1998 | 0.60x | $9.70 Million | $16.20 Million | ▲ +6746.3% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-200.00K | $22.20 Million | ▼ -101.5% |
| 1996 | 0.62x | $8.60 Million | $13.90 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 1995 | 0.39x | $7.70 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +173.6% |
| 1994 | -0.53x | $-13.40 Million | $25.50 Million | ▲ +81.6% |
| 1993 | -2.86x | $-34.60 Million | $12.10 Million | ▼ -681.0% |
| 1992 | -0.37x | $-6.70 Million | $18.30 Million | ▼ -3.2% |
| 1991 | -0.35x | $-2.20 Million | $6.20 Million | — |