Vericel Corp Ord (VCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vericel Corp Ord (VCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($133.33 Million) in one year. Explore how much of Vericel Corp Ord's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vericel Corp Ord Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vericel Corp Ord across 31 annual periods. Also explore Vericel Corp Ord (VCEL) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vericel Corp Ord (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vericel Corp Ord. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see VCEL stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.39x | $51.91 Million | $133.33 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2024 | 0.41x | $58.16 Million | $140.75 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $35.31 Million | $127.70 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $17.69 Million | $80.73 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | $29.04 Million | $73.24 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $17.57 Million | $71.35 Million | ▲ +244.5% |
| 2019 | -0.17x | $-7.18 Million | $42.15 Million | ▼ -580.8% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | $-412.00K | $16.46 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2017 | -0.41x | $-13.18 Million | $32.04 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2016 | -0.83x | $-19.89 Million | $23.89 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2015 | -1.10x | $-13.35 Million | $12.18 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2014 | -2.13x | $-25.41 Million | $11.94 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2013 | -3.75x | $-19.94 Million | $5.32 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2012 | -5.22x | $-29.55 Million | $5.67 Million | ▼ -341.0% |
| 2011 | -1.18x | $-24.49 Million | $20.71 Million | ▼ -134.4% |
| 2010 | -0.50x | $-15.09 Million | $29.91 Million | ▲ +92.7% |
| 2009 | -6.93x | $-13.80 Million | $1.99 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2008 | -6.77x | $-19.53 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2007 | -3.23x | $-14.83 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2006 | -5.32x | $-13.52 Million | $2.54 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2005 | -12.73x | $-11.06 Million | $869.00K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2004 | -17.07x | $-9.53 Million | $558.00K | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2003 | -15.50x | $-8.99 Million | $580.00K | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2002 | -11.67x | $-8.75 Million | $750.00K | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2001 | -6.29x | $-6.36 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2000 | -6.86x | $-6.88 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 1999 | -10.88x | $-11.20 Million | $1.03 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 1998 | -10.23x | $-15.64 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 1997 | -6.34x | $-13.30 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1996 | -7.39x | $-13.30 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 1995 | -7.00x | $-9.10 Million | $1.30 Million | — |