Vericel Corp Ord (VCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vericel Corp Ord (VCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($133.33 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Vericel Corp Ord to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vericel Corp Ord Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vericel Corp Ord across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Vericel Corp Ord cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vericel Corp Ord (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vericel Corp Ord. Check earnings quality score of Vericel Corp Ord to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.39x | $51.91 Million | $133.33 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2024 | 0.41x | $58.16 Million | $140.75 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $35.31 Million | $127.70 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $17.69 Million | $80.73 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | $29.04 Million | $73.24 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $17.57 Million | $71.35 Million | ▲ +244.5% |
| 2019 | -0.17x | $-7.18 Million | $42.15 Million | ▼ -580.8% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | $-412.00K | $16.46 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2017 | -0.41x | $-13.18 Million | $32.04 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2016 | -0.83x | $-19.89 Million | $23.89 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2015 | -1.10x | $-13.35 Million | $12.18 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2014 | -2.13x | $-25.41 Million | $11.94 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2013 | -3.75x | $-19.94 Million | $5.32 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2012 | -5.22x | $-29.55 Million | $5.67 Million | ▼ -341.0% |
| 2011 | -1.18x | $-24.49 Million | $20.71 Million | ▼ -134.4% |
| 2010 | -0.50x | $-15.09 Million | $29.91 Million | ▲ +92.7% |
| 2009 | -6.93x | $-13.80 Million | $1.99 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2008 | -6.77x | $-19.53 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2007 | -3.23x | $-14.83 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2006 | -5.32x | $-13.52 Million | $2.54 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2005 | -12.73x | $-11.06 Million | $869.00K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2004 | -17.07x | $-9.53 Million | $558.00K | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2003 | -15.50x | $-8.99 Million | $580.00K | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2002 | -11.67x | $-8.75 Million | $750.00K | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2001 | -6.29x | $-6.36 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2000 | -6.86x | $-6.88 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 1999 | -10.88x | $-11.20 Million | $1.03 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 1998 | -10.23x | $-15.64 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 1997 | -6.34x | $-13.30 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1996 | -7.39x | $-13.30 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 1995 | -7.00x | $-9.10 Million | $1.30 Million | — |