Vericel Corp Ord (VCEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vericel Corp Ord (VCEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $15.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($133.33 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Vericel Corp Ord generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vericel Corp Ord Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vericel Corp Ord across 31 annual periods. Also explore Vericel Corp Ord net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vericel Corp Ord (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vericel Corp Ord. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Vericel Corp Ord.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.39x | $51.91 Million | $133.33 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2024 | 0.41x | $58.16 Million | $140.75 Million | ▲ +49.4% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $35.31 Million | $127.70 Million | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2022 | 0.22x | $17.69 Million | $80.73 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2021 | 0.40x | $29.04 Million | $73.24 Million | ▲ +61.0% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $17.57 Million | $71.35 Million | ▲ +244.5% |
| 2019 | -0.17x | $-7.18 Million | $42.15 Million | ▼ -580.8% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | $-412.00K | $16.46 Million | ▲ +93.9% |
| 2017 | -0.41x | $-13.18 Million | $32.04 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2016 | -0.83x | $-19.89 Million | $23.89 Million | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2015 | -1.10x | $-13.35 Million | $12.18 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2014 | -2.13x | $-25.41 Million | $11.94 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 2013 | -3.75x | $-19.94 Million | $5.32 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2012 | -5.22x | $-29.55 Million | $5.67 Million | ▼ -341.0% |
| 2011 | -1.18x | $-24.49 Million | $20.71 Million | ▼ -134.4% |
| 2010 | -0.50x | $-15.09 Million | $29.91 Million | ▲ +92.7% |
| 2009 | -6.93x | $-13.80 Million | $1.99 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2008 | -6.77x | $-19.53 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -110.0% |
| 2007 | -3.23x | $-14.83 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +39.4% |
| 2006 | -5.32x | $-13.52 Million | $2.54 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2005 | -12.73x | $-11.06 Million | $869.00K | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2004 | -17.07x | $-9.53 Million | $558.00K | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2003 | -15.50x | $-8.99 Million | $580.00K | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2002 | -11.67x | $-8.75 Million | $750.00K | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2001 | -6.29x | $-6.36 Million | $1.01 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2000 | -6.86x | $-6.88 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 1999 | -10.88x | $-11.20 Million | $1.03 Million | ▼ -6.3% |
| 1998 | -10.23x | $-15.64 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -61.5% |
| 1997 | -6.34x | $-13.30 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1996 | -7.39x | $-13.30 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -5.6% |
| 1995 | -7.00x | $-9.10 Million | $1.30 Million | — |