ViaSat Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ViaSat Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. ViaSat Inc (VSAT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $260.55 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.39 Billion) in one year. Check VSAT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of ViaSat Inc (1996–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of ViaSat Inc from 1996 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for ViaSat Inc across 31 annual periods. Check how high is ViaSat Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
ViaSat Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2026)
ViaSat Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ViaSat Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ViaSat Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.15x | $1.59 Billion | $10.50 Billion | ▲ +80.2% |
| 2025 | 0.08x | $908.19 Million | $10.80 Billion | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $688.20 Million | $11.26 Billion | ▼ -35.7% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $367.86 Million | $3.87 Billion | ▼ -30.3% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $505.64 Million | $3.71 Billion | ▼ -44.4% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $727.22 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $436.94 Million | $2.83 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $327.55 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -28.5% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $358.63 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | $411.30 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $296.94 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | $349.52 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +54.9% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $205.14 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +95.4% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $91.80 Million | $886.24 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $141.45 Million | $834.96 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2011 | 0.30x | $169.62 Million | $561.51 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $112.55 Million | $536.80 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | $61.94 Million | $160.15 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2008 | 0.33x | $48.30 Million | $144.66 Million | ▼ -33.0% |
| 2007 | 0.50x | $66.74 Million | $134.02 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2006 | 0.52x | $52.16 Million | $100.94 Million | ▲ +979.6% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $3.58 Million | $74.84 Million | ▼ -88.3% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | $28.60 Million | $69.63 Million | ▲ +41.2% |
| 2003 | 0.29x | $15.36 Million | $52.82 Million | ▲ +229.9% |
| 2002 | -0.22x | $-10.37 Million | $46.31 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2001 | -0.30x | $-10.97 Million | $36.22 Million | ▼ -232.3% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | $3.65 Million | $15.93 Million | ▼ -77.4% |
| 1999 | 1.02x | $13.40 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +13500.0% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-100.00K | $13.20 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | $-1.20 Million | $12.10 Million | ▼ -260.7% |
| 1996 | 0.06x | $500.00K | $8.10 Million | — |