Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $77.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.88 Billion) in one year. See WLFC financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Willis Lease Finance Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Willis Lease Finance Corporation across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Willis Lease Finance Corporation cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Willis Lease Finance Corporation. Check WLFC operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $283.24 Million | $3.31 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $284.41 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $229.74 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $144.42 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $90.66 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $93.44 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $230.31 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $188.69 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $135.26 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $100.91 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $109.12 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $62.73 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $80.30 Million | $986.62 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $67.31 Million | $879.16 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $76.66 Million | $896.54 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $56.63 Million | $898.99 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $87.57 Million | $876.91 Million | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $51.57 Million | $791.10 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $54.87 Million | $693.94 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $38.98 Million | $590.78 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $29.75 Million | $534.20 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $42.66 Million | $468.99 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $41.89 Million | $449.96 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $31.60 Million | $438.46 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $33.31 Million | $430.87 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $26.52 Million | $360.24 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $22.00 Million | $342.80 Million | ▲ +199.9% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-18.90 Million | $294.20 Million | ▼ -242.1% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $6.50 Million | $143.80 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $9.60 Million | $101.70 Million | ▲ +1533.0% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $500.00K | $86.50 Million | — |