Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $56.68 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.81 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Willis Lease Finance Corporation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Willis Lease Finance Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Willis Lease Finance Corporation across 31 annual periods. Also explore WLFC year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Willis Lease Finance Corporation (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Willis Lease Finance Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Willis Lease Finance Corporation (WLFC) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $283.24 Million | $3.31 Billion | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | $284.41 Million | $2.75 Billion | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $229.74 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +56.0% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $144.42 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $90.66 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $93.44 Million | $2.04 Billion | ▼ -68.3% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $230.31 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $188.69 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $135.26 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2016 | 0.09x | $100.91 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $109.12 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +65.5% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $62.73 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $80.30 Million | $986.62 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $67.31 Million | $879.16 Million | ▼ -10.5% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $76.66 Million | $896.54 Million | ▲ +35.7% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $56.63 Million | $898.99 Million | ▼ -36.9% |
| 2009 | 0.10x | $87.57 Million | $876.91 Million | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $51.57 Million | $791.10 Million | ▼ -17.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $54.87 Million | $693.94 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $38.98 Million | $590.78 Million | ▲ +18.5% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $29.75 Million | $534.20 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $42.66 Million | $468.99 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $41.89 Million | $449.96 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $31.60 Million | $438.46 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $33.31 Million | $430.87 Million | ▲ +5.0% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $26.52 Million | $360.24 Million | ▲ +14.7% |
| 1999 | 0.06x | $22.00 Million | $342.80 Million | ▲ +199.9% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-18.90 Million | $294.20 Million | ▼ -242.1% |
| 1997 | 0.05x | $6.50 Million | $143.80 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $9.60 Million | $101.70 Million | ▲ +1533.0% |
| 1995 | 0.01x | $500.00K | $86.50 Million | — |