Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($36.53 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see WVVI cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. Check Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-1.79 Million | $41.55 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2024 | -0.08x | $-3.24 Million | $39.78 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | $-1.99 Million | $35.07 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-2.67 Million | $28.32 Million | ▼ -196.6% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $2.57 Million | $26.41 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $5.42 Million | $20.67 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $4.29 Million | $18.87 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $2.30 Million | $13.92 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $2.51 Million | $14.95 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $3.09 Million | $10.24 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $2.70 Million | $11.46 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | $3.01 Million | $9.79 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $1.69 Million | $10.15 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $3.15 Million | $8.07 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | $2.72 Million | $7.85 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2010 | 0.48x | $3.01 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +465.6% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-950.47K | $7.17 Million | ▼ -301.3% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $396.59K | $6.02 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $470.22K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -73.9% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $2.19 Million | $4.46 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2005 | 0.51x | $2.57 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +542.0% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $644.57K | $8.05 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $1.08 Million | $8.26 Million | ▲ +1062.3% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | $-122.33K | $9.02 Million | ▼ -127.9% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $451.44K | $9.29 Million | ▲ +297.1% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-216.88K | $8.80 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | $-118.75K | $8.05 Million | ▼ -118.2% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $600.00K | $7.40 Million | ▲ +178.8% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | $-700.00K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 1996 | -0.06x | $-300.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -117.9% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +266.7% |
| 1993 | -0.21x | $-300.00K | $1.40 Million | — |