Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $794.95K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($37.56 Million) in one year. Explore WVVI long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore WVVI current and non-current assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see WVVI market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -43.09x | $-1.79 Billion | $41.55 Million | ▼ -52845.2% |
| 2024 | -0.08x | $-3.24 Million | $39.78 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | $-1.99 Million | $35.07 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-2.67 Million | $28.32 Million | ▼ -196.6% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $2.57 Million | $26.41 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $5.42 Million | $20.67 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $4.29 Million | $18.87 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $2.30 Million | $13.92 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $2.51 Million | $14.95 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $3.09 Million | $10.24 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $2.70 Million | $11.46 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | $3.01 Million | $9.79 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $1.69 Million | $10.15 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $3.15 Million | $8.07 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | $2.72 Million | $7.85 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2010 | 0.48x | $3.01 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +465.6% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-950.47K | $7.17 Million | ▼ -301.3% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $396.59K | $6.02 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $470.22K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -73.9% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $2.19 Million | $4.46 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2005 | 0.51x | $2.57 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +542.0% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $644.57K | $8.05 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $1.08 Million | $8.26 Million | ▲ +1062.3% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | $-122.33K | $9.02 Million | ▼ -127.9% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $451.44K | $9.29 Million | ▲ +297.1% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-216.88K | $8.80 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | $-118.75K | $8.05 Million | ▼ -118.2% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $600.00K | $7.40 Million | ▲ +178.8% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | $-700.00K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 1996 | -0.06x | $-300.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -117.9% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +266.7% |
| 1993 | -0.21x | $-300.00K | $1.40 Million | — |