Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $794.95K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($37.56 Million) in one year. See Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -43.09x | $-1.79 Billion | $41.55 Million | ▼ -52845.2% |
| 2024 | -0.08x | $-3.24 Million | $39.78 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | $-1.99 Million | $35.07 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-2.67 Million | $28.32 Million | ▼ -196.6% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $2.57 Million | $26.41 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $5.42 Million | $20.67 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $4.29 Million | $18.87 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $2.30 Million | $13.92 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $2.51 Million | $14.95 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $3.09 Million | $10.24 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $2.70 Million | $11.46 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | $3.01 Million | $9.79 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $1.69 Million | $10.15 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $3.15 Million | $8.07 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | $2.72 Million | $7.85 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2010 | 0.48x | $3.01 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +465.6% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-950.47K | $7.17 Million | ▼ -301.3% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $396.59K | $6.02 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $470.22K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -73.9% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $2.19 Million | $4.46 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2005 | 0.51x | $2.57 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +542.0% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $644.57K | $8.05 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $1.08 Million | $8.26 Million | ▲ +1062.3% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | $-122.33K | $9.02 Million | ▼ -127.9% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $451.44K | $9.29 Million | ▲ +297.1% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-216.88K | $8.80 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | $-118.75K | $8.05 Million | ▼ -118.2% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $600.00K | $7.40 Million | ▲ +178.8% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | $-700.00K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 1996 | -0.06x | $-300.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -117.9% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +266.7% |
| 1993 | -0.21x | $-300.00K | $1.40 Million | — |