Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($36.53 Million) in one year. Check Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (WVVI) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc across 32 annual periods. Check Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Willamette Valley Vineyards Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.04x | $-1.79 Million | $41.55 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2024 | -0.08x | $-3.24 Million | $39.78 Million | ▼ -43.5% |
| 2023 | -0.06x | $-1.99 Million | $35.07 Million | ▲ +39.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-2.67 Million | $28.32 Million | ▼ -196.6% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $2.57 Million | $26.41 Million | ▼ -62.9% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $5.42 Million | $20.67 Million | ▲ +15.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $4.29 Million | $18.87 Million | ▲ +37.5% |
| 2018 | 0.17x | $2.30 Million | $13.92 Million | ▼ -1.5% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $2.51 Million | $14.95 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $3.09 Million | $10.24 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $2.70 Million | $11.46 Million | ▼ -23.4% |
| 2014 | 0.31x | $3.01 Million | $9.79 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $1.69 Million | $10.15 Million | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2012 | 0.39x | $3.15 Million | $8.07 Million | ▲ +12.6% |
| 2011 | 0.35x | $2.72 Million | $7.85 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2010 | 0.48x | $3.01 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +465.6% |
| 2009 | -0.13x | $-950.47K | $7.17 Million | ▼ -301.3% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $396.59K | $6.02 Million | ▼ -48.6% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $470.22K | $3.67 Million | ▼ -73.9% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $2.19 Million | $4.46 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2005 | 0.51x | $2.57 Million | $5.00 Million | ▲ +542.0% |
| 2004 | 0.08x | $644.57K | $8.05 Million | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $1.08 Million | $8.26 Million | ▲ +1062.3% |
| 2002 | -0.01x | $-122.33K | $9.02 Million | ▼ -127.9% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $451.44K | $9.29 Million | ▲ +297.1% |
| 2000 | -0.02x | $-216.88K | $8.80 Million | ▼ -67.0% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | $-118.75K | $8.05 Million | ▼ -118.2% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $600.00K | $7.40 Million | ▲ +178.8% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | $-700.00K | $6.80 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 1996 | -0.06x | $-300.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -117.9% |
| 1994 | 0.36x | $500.00K | $1.40 Million | ▲ +266.7% |
| 1993 | -0.21x | $-300.00K | $1.40 Million | — |