XOMA Royalty Corporation (XOMA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
XOMA Royalty Corporation (XOMA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($158.96 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of XOMA Royalty Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
XOMA Royalty Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for XOMA Royalty Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore how large is XOMA Royalty Corporation's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for XOMA Royalty Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for XOMA Royalty Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see XOMA Royalty Corporation (XOMA) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $2.87 Million | $168.74 Million | ▲ +117.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-13.75 Million | $139.36 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | $-18.16 Million | $145.58 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2022 | -0.79x | $-12.88 Million | $16.37 Million | ▼ -185.7% |
| 2021 | 0.92x | $22.68 Million | $24.69 Million | ▲ +253.7% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $10.09 Million | $38.86 Million | ▲ +4814.2% |
| 2019 | -0.01x | $-285.00K | $51.74 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2018 | -0.28x | $-12.64 Million | $45.00 Million | ▼ -509.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $2.69 Million | $39.15 Million | ▲ +115.5% |
| 2016 | -0.44x | $-33.69 Million | $75.89 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2015 | -0.40x | $-30.89 Million | $77.19 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2014 | -0.90x | $-78.28 Million | $86.53 Million | ▼ -173.4% |
| 2013 | -0.33x | $-45.91 Million | $138.77 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2012 | -0.48x | $-40.77 Million | $84.21 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | $-29.06 Million | $63.02 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2010 | -1.04x | $-52.54 Million | $50.66 Million | ▼ -592.3% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $7.43 Million | $35.30 Million | ▲ +163.0% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-32.98 Million | $98.57 Million | ▼ -722.2% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | $4.54 Million | $84.50 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2006 | -0.26x | $-33.27 Million | $129.65 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2005 | -0.47x | $-44.19 Million | $93.25 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2004 | -0.63x | $-44.83 Million | $70.87 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2003 | -0.67x | $-47.54 Million | $70.64 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | $-34.84 Million | $83.15 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2001 | -0.31x | $-22.42 Million | $72.49 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2000 | -0.42x | $-22.46 Million | $53.80 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 1999 | -0.95x | $-43.10 Million | $45.20 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 1998 | -1.02x | $-37.70 Million | $37.10 Million | ▼ -184.5% |
| 1997 | -0.36x | $-12.00 Million | $33.60 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1996 | -0.97x | $-22.40 Million | $23.00 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 1995 | -2.05x | $-28.90 Million | $14.10 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 1994 | -1.51x | $-28.50 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 1993 | -1.84x | $-28.90 Million | $15.70 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 1992 | -1.64x | $-34.20 Million | $20.80 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1991 | -1.39x | $-27.60 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -335.5% |
| 1990 | -0.32x | $-22.60 Million | $70.60 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 1989 | -0.22x | $-18.30 Million | $83.40 Million | — |