XOMA Royalty Corporation (XOMA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
XOMA Royalty Corporation (XOMA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($168.74 Million) in one year. See XOMA Royalty Corporation free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
XOMA Royalty Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for XOMA Royalty Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore XOMA Royalty Corporation net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for XOMA Royalty Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for XOMA Royalty Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see XOMA company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $2.87 Million | $168.74 Million | ▲ +117.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-13.75 Million | $139.36 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | $-18.16 Million | $145.58 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2022 | -0.79x | $-12.88 Million | $16.37 Million | ▼ -185.7% |
| 2021 | 0.92x | $22.68 Million | $24.69 Million | ▲ +253.7% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $10.09 Million | $38.86 Million | ▲ +4814.2% |
| 2019 | -0.01x | $-285.00K | $51.74 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2018 | -0.28x | $-12.64 Million | $45.00 Million | ▼ -509.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $2.69 Million | $39.15 Million | ▲ +115.5% |
| 2016 | -0.44x | $-33.69 Million | $75.89 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2015 | -0.40x | $-30.89 Million | $77.19 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2014 | -0.90x | $-78.28 Million | $86.53 Million | ▼ -173.4% |
| 2013 | -0.33x | $-45.91 Million | $138.77 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2012 | -0.48x | $-40.77 Million | $84.21 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | $-29.06 Million | $63.02 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2010 | -1.04x | $-52.54 Million | $50.66 Million | ▼ -592.3% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $7.43 Million | $35.30 Million | ▲ +163.0% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-32.98 Million | $98.57 Million | ▼ -722.2% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | $4.54 Million | $84.50 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2006 | -0.26x | $-33.27 Million | $129.65 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2005 | -0.47x | $-44.19 Million | $93.25 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2004 | -0.63x | $-44.83 Million | $70.87 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2003 | -0.67x | $-47.54 Million | $70.64 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | $-34.84 Million | $83.15 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2001 | -0.31x | $-22.42 Million | $72.49 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2000 | -0.42x | $-22.46 Million | $53.80 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 1999 | -0.95x | $-43.10 Million | $45.20 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 1998 | -1.02x | $-37.70 Million | $37.10 Million | ▼ -184.5% |
| 1997 | -0.36x | $-12.00 Million | $33.60 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1996 | -0.97x | $-22.40 Million | $23.00 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 1995 | -2.05x | $-28.90 Million | $14.10 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 1994 | -1.51x | $-28.50 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 1993 | -1.84x | $-28.90 Million | $15.70 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 1992 | -1.64x | $-34.20 Million | $20.80 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1991 | -1.39x | $-27.60 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -335.5% |
| 1990 | -0.32x | $-22.60 Million | $70.60 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 1989 | -0.22x | $-18.30 Million | $83.40 Million | — |