XOMA Royalty Corporation (XOMA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
XOMA Royalty Corporation (XOMA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.04 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($158.96 Million) in one year. See XOMA FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
XOMA Royalty Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for XOMA Royalty Corporation across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see XOMA Royalty Corporation (XOMA) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for XOMA Royalty Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for XOMA Royalty Corporation. Check how high is XOMA Royalty Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $2.87 Million | $168.74 Million | ▲ +117.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-13.75 Million | $139.36 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2023 | -0.12x | $-18.16 Million | $145.58 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2022 | -0.79x | $-12.88 Million | $16.37 Million | ▼ -185.7% |
| 2021 | 0.92x | $22.68 Million | $24.69 Million | ▲ +253.7% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $10.09 Million | $38.86 Million | ▲ +4814.2% |
| 2019 | -0.01x | $-285.00K | $51.74 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2018 | -0.28x | $-12.64 Million | $45.00 Million | ▼ -509.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $2.69 Million | $39.15 Million | ▲ +115.5% |
| 2016 | -0.44x | $-33.69 Million | $75.89 Million | ▼ -10.9% |
| 2015 | -0.40x | $-30.89 Million | $77.19 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2014 | -0.90x | $-78.28 Million | $86.53 Million | ▼ -173.4% |
| 2013 | -0.33x | $-45.91 Million | $138.77 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2012 | -0.48x | $-40.77 Million | $84.21 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2011 | -0.46x | $-29.06 Million | $63.02 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2010 | -1.04x | $-52.54 Million | $50.66 Million | ▼ -592.3% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $7.43 Million | $35.30 Million | ▲ +163.0% |
| 2008 | -0.33x | $-32.98 Million | $98.57 Million | ▼ -722.2% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | $4.54 Million | $84.50 Million | ▲ +121.0% |
| 2006 | -0.26x | $-33.27 Million | $129.65 Million | ▲ +45.9% |
| 2005 | -0.47x | $-44.19 Million | $93.25 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2004 | -0.63x | $-44.83 Million | $70.87 Million | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2003 | -0.67x | $-47.54 Million | $70.64 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2002 | -0.42x | $-34.84 Million | $83.15 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2001 | -0.31x | $-22.42 Million | $72.49 Million | ▲ +25.9% |
| 2000 | -0.42x | $-22.46 Million | $53.80 Million | ▲ +56.2% |
| 1999 | -0.95x | $-43.10 Million | $45.20 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 1998 | -1.02x | $-37.70 Million | $37.10 Million | ▼ -184.5% |
| 1997 | -0.36x | $-12.00 Million | $33.60 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 1996 | -0.97x | $-22.40 Million | $23.00 Million | ▲ +52.5% |
| 1995 | -2.05x | $-28.90 Million | $14.10 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 1994 | -1.51x | $-28.50 Million | $18.90 Million | ▲ +18.1% |
| 1993 | -1.84x | $-28.90 Million | $15.70 Million | ▼ -12.0% |
| 1992 | -1.64x | $-34.20 Million | $20.80 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1991 | -1.39x | $-27.60 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -335.5% |
| 1990 | -0.32x | $-22.60 Million | $70.60 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 1989 | -0.22x | $-18.30 Million | $83.40 Million | — |