Ziff Davis Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ziff Davis Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ziff Davis Inc (ZD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $88.96 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.76 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does Ziff Davis Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ziff Davis Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ziff Davis Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ziff Davis Inc across 28 annual periods. Check ZD cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Ziff Davis Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
Ziff Davis Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ziff Davis Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ziff Davis Inc (ZD) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.21x | $407.07 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2024 | 0.21x | $390.31 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $319.96 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2022 | 0.21x | $336.44 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | $515.57 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +46.2% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $480.08 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $412.54 Million | $2.19 Billion | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | $401.32 Million | $1.53 Billion | ▲ +42.6% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $264.42 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▼ -25.0% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $282.39 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | $229.06 Million | $902.66 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | $175.90 Million | $880.96 Million | ▼ -53.8% |
| 2013 | 0.43x | $193.32 Million | $447.37 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2012 | 0.42x | $169.91 Million | $400.57 Million | ▼ -72.8% |
| 2011 | 1.56x | $150.75 Million | $96.80 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2010 | 0.96x | $96.39 Million | $100.88 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2009 | 1.31x | $101.83 Million | $77.83 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2008 | 1.26x | $90.72 Million | $72.06 Million | ▼ -9.4% |
| 2007 | 1.39x | $94.21 Million | $67.80 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2006 | 2.18x | $73.00 Million | $33.42 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2005 | 3.50x | $64.34 Million | $18.36 Million | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2004 | 3.96x | $51.32 Million | $12.96 Million | ▲ +20.8% |
| 2003 | 3.28x | $32.63 Million | $9.95 Million | ▲ +48.5% |
| 2002 | 2.21x | $16.36 Million | $7.41 Million | ▲ +940.3% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $1.68 Million | $7.92 Million | ▲ +134.2% |
| 2000 | -0.62x | $-11.93 Million | $19.25 Million | ▲ +72.3% |
| 1999 | -2.24x | $-12.10 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -224.9% |
| 1998 | -0.69x | $-10.00 Million | $14.50 Million | — |