Chalet Hotels Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.12x

Chalet Hotels Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Chalet Hotels Limited (CHALET) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Rs4.28 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Rs35.59 Billion) in one year. Check CHALET total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.12x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Rs4.28 Billion
INR

Total Liabilities

Rs35.59 Billion
INR

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Chalet Hotels Limited (2014–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Chalet Hotels Limited from 2014 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Chalet Hotels Limited across 12 annual periods. Check CHALET operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Chalet Hotels Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2014–2025)

Chalet Hotels Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2014 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Chalet Hotels Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CHALET cash flow conversion.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (INR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.24x Rs9.50 Billion Rs40.18 Billion ▲ +33.8%
2024 0.18x Rs6.89 Billion Rs38.99 Billion ▲ +26.4%
2023 0.14x Rs4.77 Billion Rs34.09 Billion ▲ +597.4%
2022 0.02x Rs622.20 Million Rs31.02 Billion ▼ -14.2%
2021 0.02x Rs601.71 Million Rs25.73 Billion ▼ -77.2%
2020 0.10x Rs2.52 Billion Rs24.58 Billion ▼ -40.0%
2019 0.17x Rs3.66 Billion Rs21.34 Billion ▲ +128.9%
2018 0.07x Rs2.49 Billion Rs33.28 Billion ▲ +21.4%
2017 0.06x Rs2.01 Billion Rs32.67 Billion ▲ +135.4%
2016 0.03x Rs793.40 Million Rs30.32 Billion ▲ +696.8%
2015 0.00x Rs-122.96 Million Rs28.04 Billion ▼ -111.7%
2014 0.04x Rs932.82 Million Rs24.82 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.