Heads UP Ventures Limited (HEADSUP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.14x

Heads UP Ventures Limited (HEADSUP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Rs-11.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Rs83.36 Million) in one year. See Heads UP Ventures Limited leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.14x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Rs-11.89 Million
INR

Total Liabilities

Rs83.36 Million
INR

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Heads UP Ventures Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2026)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Heads UP Ventures Limited across 15 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HEADSUP cash flow metrics.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Heads UP Ventures Limited (2012–2026)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Heads UP Ventures Limited. Check Heads UP Ventures Limited cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (INR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2026 -0.03x Rs-9.49 Million Rs297.60 Million ▼ -199.0%
2025 0.03x Rs944.00K Rs29.29 Million ▲ +106.6%
2024 -0.49x Rs-11.35 Million Rs23.29 Million ▲ +82.8%
2023 -2.83x Rs-94.62 Million Rs33.39 Million ▼ -2576.3%
2022 0.11x Rs8.43 Million Rs73.70 Million ▼ -89.8%
2021 1.12x Rs121.97 Million Rs109.05 Million ▲ +1.4%
2020 1.10x Rs236.83 Million Rs214.68 Million ▲ +2819.3%
2019 0.04x Rs20.29 Million Rs536.80 Million ▼ -70.4%
2018 0.13x Rs85.38 Million Rs669.12 Million ▼ -38.4%
2017 0.21x Rs155.03 Million Rs748.18 Million ▼ -44.5%
2016 0.37x Rs314.41 Million Rs841.89 Million ▲ +148.2%
2015 0.15x Rs103.28 Million Rs686.35 Million ▲ +763.6%
2014 -0.02x Rs-10.00K Rs441.00K ▲ +12.7%
2013 -0.03x Rs-10.00K Rs385.00K ▲ +98.8%
2012 -2.23x Rs-847.00K Rs379.00K
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.