Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited (PRINCEPIPE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.32x

Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited (PRINCEPIPE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.32x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Rs2.00 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Rs6.34 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.32x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Rs2.00 Billion
INR

Total Liabilities

Rs6.34 Billion
INR

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited across 13 annual periods. Also explore Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited (PRINCEPIPE) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited (2013–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Prince Pipes And Fittings Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PRINCEPIPE market cap overview.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (INR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.16x Rs1.19 Billion Rs7.43 Billion ▲ +181.7%
2024 0.06x Rs328.98 Million Rs5.79 Billion ▼ -92.3%
2023 0.73x Rs3.60 Billion Rs4.90 Billion ▲ +2638.5%
2022 -0.03x Rs-195.00 Million Rs6.74 Billion ▼ -105.3%
2021 0.55x Rs3.07 Billion Rs5.63 Billion ▲ +302.2%
2020 -0.27x Rs-1.55 Billion Rs5.73 Billion ▼ -178.4%
2019 0.34x Rs2.20 Billion Rs6.40 Billion ▲ +40.9%
2018 0.24x Rs1.62 Billion Rs6.63 Billion ▲ +30.9%
2017 0.19x Rs968.20 Million Rs5.18 Billion ▼ -1.9%
2016 0.19x Rs894.05 Million Rs4.69 Billion ▼ -31.6%
2015 0.28x Rs1.23 Billion Rs4.41 Billion ▲ +893.7%
2014 0.03x Rs127.77 Million Rs4.56 Billion ▼ -44.0%
2013 0.05x Rs216.70 Million Rs4.33 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.