Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.60 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Acco Brands Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Acco Brands Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Acco Brands Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore ACCO total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Acco Brands Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Acco Brands Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $68.70 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $148.20 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $128.70 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $77.60 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $159.60 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $119.20 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $203.90 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $194.80 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $204.90 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $165.90 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $171.20 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $171.70 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $194.50 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +2983.3% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-7.50 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -107.5% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $63.40 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $54.90 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $71.50 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +101.9% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $37.20 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $81.20 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $120.90 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +92.2% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $65.30 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $22.71 Million | $462.57 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $51.62 Million | $476.37 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $46.47 Million | $509.85 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $50.77 Million | $595.32 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $74.99 Million | $613.63 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $80.37 Million | $672.88 Million | ▲ +237.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $24.13 Million | $682.65 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $20.72 Million | $501.87 Million | ▲ +301.2% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.28 Million | $221.57 Million | ▼ -94.5% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | $26.98 Million | $144.73 Million | ▲ +411.3% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $5.22 Million | $143.19 Million | — |