Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.60 Billion) in one year. See Acco Brands Corporation free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Acco Brands Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Acco Brands Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Acco Brands Corporation (ACCO) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Acco Brands Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Acco Brands Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Acco Brands Corporation worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $68.70 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | $148.20 Million | $1.62 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $128.70 Million | $1.86 Billion | ▲ +77.2% |
| 2022 | 0.04x | $77.60 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2021 | 0.07x | $159.60 Million | $2.23 Billion | ▲ +38.7% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $119.20 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $203.90 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $194.80 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $204.90 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▼ -17.3% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $165.90 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -1.9% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $171.20 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $171.70 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $194.50 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +2983.3% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-7.50 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -107.5% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $63.40 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $54.90 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -25.9% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $71.50 Million | $1.22 Billion | ▲ +101.9% |
| 2008 | 0.03x | $37.20 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -48.0% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | $81.20 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $120.90 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▲ +92.2% |
| 2005 | 0.04x | $65.30 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $22.71 Million | $462.57 Million | ▼ -54.7% |
| 2003 | 0.11x | $51.62 Million | $476.37 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $46.47 Million | $509.85 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $50.77 Million | $595.32 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2000 | 0.12x | $74.99 Million | $613.63 Million | ▲ +2.3% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $80.37 Million | $672.88 Million | ▲ +237.9% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $24.13 Million | $682.65 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $20.72 Million | $501.87 Million | ▲ +301.2% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $2.28 Million | $221.57 Million | ▼ -94.5% |
| 1995 | 0.19x | $26.98 Million | $144.73 Million | ▲ +411.3% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $5.22 Million | $143.19 Million | — |