Applied Industrial Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Applied Industrial Technologies cash flow-to-debt ratio. Applied Industrial Technologies (AIT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $100.11 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.13 Billion) in one year. Check how high is Applied Industrial Technologies's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Applied Industrial Technologies (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Applied Industrial Technologies from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Applied Industrial Technologies across 37 annual periods. Check how aggressively does Applied Industrial Technologies reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Applied Industrial Technologies Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Applied Industrial Technologies cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Applied Industrial Technologies. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AIT cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.37x | $492.38 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +25.8% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $371.39 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2023 | 0.27x | $343.97 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $187.57 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2021 | 0.18x | $241.70 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $296.71 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +63.7% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $180.60 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $147.30 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2017 | 0.26x | $164.62 Million | $642.34 Million | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $160.99 Million | $654.61 Million | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | $154.54 Million | $693.64 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2014 | 0.21x | $110.11 Million | $533.86 Million | ▼ -44.6% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $111.40 Million | $299.09 Million | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | $90.42 Million | $290.05 Million | ▲ +14.1% |
| 2011 | 0.27x | $76.84 Million | $281.37 Million | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2010 | 0.55x | $184.32 Million | $336.48 Million | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2009 | 0.27x | $81.30 Million | $301.23 Million | ▼ -27.4% |
| 2008 | 0.37x | $110.30 Million | $296.70 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $70.92 Million | $326.39 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $69.85 Million | $315.85 Million | ▼ -19.0% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $81.03 Million | $296.88 Million | ▲ +63.0% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $43.09 Million | $257.31 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $67.29 Million | $245.55 Million | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2002 | 0.29x | $68.95 Million | $236.42 Million | ▲ +109.5% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $37.22 Million | $267.34 Million | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2000 | 0.26x | $76.44 Million | $295.34 Million | ▼ -12.6% |
| 1999 | 0.30x | $83.10 Million | $280.70 Million | ▲ +7587.3% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $1.20 Million | $311.60 Million | ▼ -98.3% |
| 1997 | 0.22x | $41.80 Million | $186.50 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $36.40 Million | $214.80 Million | ▲ +145.1% |
| 1995 | 0.07x | $13.40 Million | $193.80 Million | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1994 | 0.16x | $30.50 Million | $193.00 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 1993 | 0.10x | $18.90 Million | $181.00 Million | ▼ -32.7% |
| 1992 | 0.16x | $31.30 Million | $201.80 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 1991 | 0.29x | $55.60 Million | $193.70 Million | ▲ +890.1% |
| 1990 | 0.03x | $7.10 Million | $244.90 Million | ▼ -78.5% |
| 1989 | 0.13x | $15.70 Million | $116.60 Million | — |