Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $58.25 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.94 Billion) in one year. See AKR financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Acadia Realty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Acadia Realty Trust across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AKR cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Acadia Realty Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Acadia Realty Trust. Check AKR cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $166.98 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $140.45 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $155.76 Million | $2.16 Billion | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $133.21 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $104.98 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $102.56 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $127.18 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $96.08 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $119.83 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $111.76 Million | $1.82 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $113.60 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $82.52 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $65.23 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $59.67 Million | $838.18 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $66.33 Million | $884.01 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $44.38 Million | $937.28 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $47.46 Million | $849.99 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $65.89 Million | $849.15 Million | ▼ -56.7% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $105.17 Million | $587.16 Million | ▲ +124.6% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $39.63 Million | $496.84 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $23.96 Million | $474.34 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $23.82 Million | $382.80 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $19.08 Million | $349.18 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $24.92 Million | $224.49 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $31.04 Million | $276.02 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $32.57 Million | $293.14 Million | ▲ +46.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $25.89 Million | $341.63 Million | ▲ +81.5% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $12.20 Million | $292.23 Million | ▼ -38.0% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $13.24 Million | $196.46 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $14.06 Million | $201.71 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $14.60 Million | $166.50 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $13.20 Million | $149.50 Million | — |