Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $31.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.89 Billion) in one year. Explore Acadia Realty Trust (AKR) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Acadia Realty Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Acadia Realty Trust across 32 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Acadia Realty Trust for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Acadia Realty Trust (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Acadia Realty Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AKR stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $166.98 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $140.45 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $155.76 Million | $2.16 Billion | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2022 | 0.06x | $133.21 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2021 | 0.05x | $104.98 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +0.8% |
| 2020 | 0.05x | $102.56 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $127.18 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $96.08 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -25.5% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $119.83 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $111.76 Million | $1.82 Billion | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $113.60 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2014 | 0.06x | $82.52 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $65.23 Million | $1.14 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $59.67 Million | $838.18 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $66.33 Million | $884.01 Million | ▲ +58.5% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $44.38 Million | $937.28 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2009 | 0.06x | $47.46 Million | $849.99 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $65.89 Million | $849.15 Million | ▼ -56.7% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $105.17 Million | $587.16 Million | ▲ +124.6% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $39.63 Million | $496.84 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $23.96 Million | $474.34 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $23.82 Million | $382.80 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $19.08 Million | $349.18 Million | ▼ -50.8% |
| 2002 | 0.11x | $24.92 Million | $224.49 Million | ▼ -1.3% |
| 2001 | 0.11x | $31.04 Million | $276.02 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2000 | 0.11x | $32.57 Million | $293.14 Million | ▲ +46.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $25.89 Million | $341.63 Million | ▲ +81.5% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $12.20 Million | $292.23 Million | ▼ -38.0% |
| 1997 | 0.07x | $13.24 Million | $196.46 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $14.06 Million | $201.71 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $14.60 Million | $166.50 Million | ▼ -0.7% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $13.20 Million | $149.50 Million | — |