Alamo Group Inc (ALG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alamo Group Inc (ALG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $65.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($462.37 Million) in one year. See Alamo Group Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alamo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alamo Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Alamo Group Inc (ALG) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alamo Group Inc (1992–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alamo Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Alamo Group Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.49x | $209.78 Million | $432.02 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $131.15 Million | $476.62 Million | ▲ +890.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $14.53 Million | $523.15 Million | ▼ -72.0% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $49.67 Million | $500.08 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $184.33 Million | $486.86 Million | ▲ +174.1% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $88.81 Million | $643.01 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $12.91 Million | $214.26 Million | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $70.80 Million | $190.56 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $75.55 Million | $165.06 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | $52.56 Million | $243.03 Million | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $30.21 Million | $291.93 Million | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $31.63 Million | $88.01 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $51.26 Million | $94.05 Million | ▲ +321.0% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $10.91 Million | $84.31 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $41.88 Million | $117.72 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $72.09 Million | $142.59 Million | ▲ +1059.3% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $8.72 Million | $200.04 Million | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $19.19 Million | $151.93 Million | ▲ +300.7% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $4.57 Million | $144.90 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $7.60 Million | $82.74 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $14.05 Million | $70.90 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $18.23 Million | $50.16 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2002 | 0.45x | $27.60 Million | $60.74 Million | ▲ +253.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $8.23 Million | $64.11 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $9.01 Million | $58.87 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 1999 | 1.58x | $39.19 Million | $24.77 Million | ▲ +18605.7% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $463.00K | $54.73 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $12.30 Million | $49.86 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $9.60 Million | $56.60 Million | ▲ +10212.4% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $60.80 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $9.80 Million | $49.00 Million | ▲ +1770.0% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $33.40 Million | ▼ -106.0% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $5.10 Million | $25.60 Million | — |