Alamo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alamo Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Alamo Group Inc (ALG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $65.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($462.37 Million) in one year. Check ALG operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Alamo Group Inc (1992–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Alamo Group Inc from 1992 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Alamo Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Check Alamo Group Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Alamo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2024)
Alamo Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alamo Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ALG cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.49x | $209.78 Million | $432.02 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $131.15 Million | $476.62 Million | ▲ +890.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $14.53 Million | $523.15 Million | ▼ -72.0% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $49.67 Million | $500.08 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $184.33 Million | $486.86 Million | ▲ +174.1% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $88.81 Million | $643.01 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $12.91 Million | $214.26 Million | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $70.80 Million | $190.56 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $75.55 Million | $165.06 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | $52.56 Million | $243.03 Million | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $30.21 Million | $291.93 Million | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $31.63 Million | $88.01 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $51.26 Million | $94.05 Million | ▲ +321.0% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $10.91 Million | $84.31 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $41.88 Million | $117.72 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $72.09 Million | $142.59 Million | ▲ +1059.3% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $8.72 Million | $200.04 Million | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $19.19 Million | $151.93 Million | ▲ +300.7% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $4.57 Million | $144.90 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $7.60 Million | $82.74 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $14.05 Million | $70.90 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $18.23 Million | $50.16 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2002 | 0.45x | $27.60 Million | $60.74 Million | ▲ +253.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $8.23 Million | $64.11 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $9.01 Million | $58.87 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 1999 | 1.58x | $39.19 Million | $24.77 Million | ▲ +18605.7% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $463.00K | $54.73 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $12.30 Million | $49.86 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $9.60 Million | $56.60 Million | ▲ +10212.4% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $60.80 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $9.80 Million | $49.00 Million | ▲ +1770.0% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $33.40 Million | ▼ -106.0% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $5.10 Million | $25.60 Million | — |