Alamo Group Inc (ALG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alamo Group Inc (ALG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $65.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($462.37 Million) in one year. See Alamo Group Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alamo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alamo Group Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Alamo Group Inc (ALG) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alamo Group Inc (1992–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alamo Group Inc. Check Alamo Group Inc (ALG) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.49x | $209.78 Million | $432.02 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $131.15 Million | $476.62 Million | ▲ +890.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $14.53 Million | $523.15 Million | ▼ -72.0% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $49.67 Million | $500.08 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $184.33 Million | $486.86 Million | ▲ +174.1% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $88.81 Million | $643.01 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $12.91 Million | $214.26 Million | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $70.80 Million | $190.56 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $75.55 Million | $165.06 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | $52.56 Million | $243.03 Million | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $30.21 Million | $291.93 Million | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $31.63 Million | $88.01 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $51.26 Million | $94.05 Million | ▲ +321.0% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $10.91 Million | $84.31 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $41.88 Million | $117.72 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $72.09 Million | $142.59 Million | ▲ +1059.3% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $8.72 Million | $200.04 Million | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $19.19 Million | $151.93 Million | ▲ +300.7% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $4.57 Million | $144.90 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $7.60 Million | $82.74 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $14.05 Million | $70.90 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $18.23 Million | $50.16 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2002 | 0.45x | $27.60 Million | $60.74 Million | ▲ +253.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $8.23 Million | $64.11 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $9.01 Million | $58.87 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 1999 | 1.58x | $39.19 Million | $24.77 Million | ▲ +18605.7% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $463.00K | $54.73 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $12.30 Million | $49.86 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $9.60 Million | $56.60 Million | ▲ +10212.4% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $60.80 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $9.80 Million | $49.00 Million | ▲ +1770.0% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $33.40 Million | ▼ -106.0% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $5.10 Million | $25.60 Million | — |