Alamo Group Inc (ALG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alamo Group Inc (ALG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $65.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($462.37 Million) in one year. Check Alamo Group Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alamo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alamo Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore ALG total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alamo Group Inc (1992–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alamo Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Alamo Group Inc (ALG) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.49x | $209.78 Million | $432.02 Million | ▲ +76.5% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $131.15 Million | $476.62 Million | ▲ +890.8% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $14.53 Million | $523.15 Million | ▼ -72.0% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $49.67 Million | $500.08 Million | ▼ -73.8% |
| 2020 | 0.38x | $184.33 Million | $486.86 Million | ▲ +174.1% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $88.81 Million | $643.01 Million | ▲ +129.2% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | $12.91 Million | $214.26 Million | ▼ -83.8% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $70.80 Million | $190.56 Million | ▼ -18.8% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $75.55 Million | $165.06 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | $52.56 Million | $243.03 Million | ▲ +109.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $30.21 Million | $291.93 Million | ▼ -71.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $31.63 Million | $88.01 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $51.26 Million | $94.05 Million | ▲ +321.0% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $10.91 Million | $84.31 Million | ▼ -63.6% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $41.88 Million | $117.72 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $72.09 Million | $142.59 Million | ▲ +1059.3% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $8.72 Million | $200.04 Million | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2007 | 0.13x | $19.19 Million | $151.93 Million | ▲ +300.7% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $4.57 Million | $144.90 Million | ▼ -65.7% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $7.60 Million | $82.74 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | $14.05 Million | $70.90 Million | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $18.23 Million | $50.16 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2002 | 0.45x | $27.60 Million | $60.74 Million | ▲ +253.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $8.23 Million | $64.11 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $9.01 Million | $58.87 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 1999 | 1.58x | $39.19 Million | $24.77 Million | ▲ +18605.7% |
| 1998 | 0.01x | $463.00K | $54.73 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $12.30 Million | $49.86 Million | ▲ +45.5% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $9.60 Million | $56.60 Million | ▲ +10212.4% |
| 1995 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $60.80 Million | ▼ -99.2% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $9.80 Million | $49.00 Million | ▲ +1770.0% |
| 1993 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $33.40 Million | ▼ -106.0% |
| 1992 | 0.20x | $5.10 Million | $25.60 Million | — |