AMTD IDEA Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AMTD IDEA Group cash flow-to-debt ratio. AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($369.89 Million) in one year. Check AMTD IDEA Group cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of AMTD IDEA Group (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of AMTD IDEA Group from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for AMTD IDEA Group across 30 annual periods. Check AMTD capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
AMTD IDEA Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
AMTD IDEA Group cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AMTD IDEA Group. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of AMTD IDEA Group.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $17.84 Million | $385.38 Million | ▲ +231.8% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $5.16 Million | $369.89 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $39.98 Million | $193.02 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 2022 | 3.59x | $209.22 Million | $58.25 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2021 | 3.77x | $434.76 Million | $115.17 Million | ▼ -80.4% |
| 2020 | 19.27x | $1.99 Billion | $103.47 Million | ▲ +402.7% |
| 2019 | 3.83x | $709.50 Million | $185.08 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2018 | 3.16x | $10.10 Million | $3.19 Million | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2017 | 12.94x | $10.79 Million | $834.10K | ▲ +16986.3% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $189.24 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +118.0% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $96.23 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $132.03 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $95.27 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $76.32 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $101.37 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $75.33 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $77.48 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $128.10 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +110.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $74.47 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $62.26 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $42.54 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $42.27 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +870.3% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $4.10 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $11.38 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +170.8% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-6.06 Million | $420.84 Million | ▼ -224.8% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $-2.01 Million | $453.10 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-10.46 Million | $361.12 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-4.60 Million | $154.60 Million | ▼ -186.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $3.05 Million | $88.52 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $2.68 Million | $60.50 Million | — |