AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($369.89 Million) in one year. See AMTD IDEA Group free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
AMTD IDEA Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for AMTD IDEA Group across 30 annual periods. Also explore AMTD year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for AMTD IDEA Group (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AMTD IDEA Group. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see AMTD stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $17.84 Million | $385.38 Million | ▲ +231.8% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $5.16 Million | $369.89 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $39.98 Million | $193.02 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 2022 | 3.59x | $209.22 Million | $58.25 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2021 | 3.77x | $434.76 Million | $115.17 Million | ▼ -80.4% |
| 2020 | 19.27x | $1.99 Billion | $103.47 Million | ▲ +402.7% |
| 2019 | 3.83x | $709.50 Million | $185.08 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2018 | 3.16x | $10.10 Million | $3.19 Million | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2017 | 12.94x | $10.79 Million | $834.10K | ▲ +16986.3% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $189.24 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +118.0% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $96.23 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $132.03 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $95.27 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $76.32 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $101.37 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $75.33 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $77.48 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $128.10 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +110.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $74.47 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $62.26 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $42.54 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $42.27 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +870.3% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $4.10 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $11.38 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +170.8% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-6.06 Million | $420.84 Million | ▼ -224.8% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $-2.01 Million | $453.10 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-10.46 Million | $361.12 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-4.60 Million | $154.60 Million | ▼ -186.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $3.05 Million | $88.52 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $2.68 Million | $60.50 Million | — |