AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($369.89 Million) in one year. See financial agility of AMTD IDEA Group to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
AMTD IDEA Group Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for AMTD IDEA Group across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for AMTD IDEA Group (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for AMTD IDEA Group. Check AMTD IDEA Group cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.05x | $17.84 Million | $385.38 Million | ▲ +231.8% |
| 2024 | 0.01x | $5.16 Million | $369.89 Million | ▼ -93.3% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $39.98 Million | $193.02 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 2022 | 3.59x | $209.22 Million | $58.25 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2021 | 3.77x | $434.76 Million | $115.17 Million | ▼ -80.4% |
| 2020 | 19.27x | $1.99 Billion | $103.47 Million | ▲ +402.7% |
| 2019 | 3.83x | $709.50 Million | $185.08 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2018 | 3.16x | $10.10 Million | $3.19 Million | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2017 | 12.94x | $10.79 Million | $834.10K | ▲ +16986.3% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $189.24 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +118.0% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $96.23 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $132.03 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $95.27 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2012 | 0.04x | $76.32 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $101.37 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $75.33 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | $77.48 Million | $1.91 Billion | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $128.10 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +110.4% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $74.47 Million | $2.05 Billion | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $62.26 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▲ +47.7% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $42.54 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $42.27 Million | $1.80 Billion | ▲ +870.3% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $4.10 Million | $1.70 Billion | ▼ -76.3% |
| 2002 | 0.01x | $11.38 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +170.8% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-6.06 Million | $420.84 Million | ▼ -224.8% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $-2.01 Million | $453.10 Million | ▲ +84.7% |
| 1999 | -0.03x | $-10.46 Million | $361.12 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-4.60 Million | $154.60 Million | ▼ -186.4% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $3.05 Million | $88.52 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 1996 | 0.04x | $2.68 Million | $60.50 Million | — |