Smith AO Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Smith AO Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Smith AO Corporation (AOS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $255.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.33 Billion) in one year. Check AOS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Smith AO Corporation (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Smith AO Corporation from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Smith AO Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Smith AO Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Smith AO Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
Smith AO Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Smith AO Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see AOS cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.43x | $581.80 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $670.30 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $391.40 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $641.10 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2020 | 0.43x | $562.10 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | $456.20 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | $448.90 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $326.40 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $446.60 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $344.40 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $263.90 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2013 | 0.26x | $279.60 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $143.80 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +208.3% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $55.00 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $124.80 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | $267.60 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +180.7% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $106.60 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $190.50 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $141.40 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $186.70 Million | $679.80 Million | ▲ +197.8% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $66.60 Million | $722.20 Million | ▲ +157.5% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $25.20 Million | $703.70 Million | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $115.17 Million | $713.80 Million | ▲ +172.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $49.83 Million | $842.04 Million | ▼ -58.3% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $86.76 Million | $610.78 Million | ▲ +87.3% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $48.01 Million | $632.90 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $74.66 Million | $366.34 Million | ▲ +349.4% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-25.88 Million | $316.81 Million | ▼ -119.4% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $194.08 Million | $460.35 Million | ▲ +109.7% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $115.52 Million | $574.58 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $119.47 Million | $535.11 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.21x | $115.35 Million | $553.47 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $67.70 Million | $524.30 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $57.70 Million | $467.40 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 1990 | 0.16x | $78.90 Million | $504.40 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $50.20 Million | $524.60 Million | — |