Smith AO Corporation (AOS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Smith AO Corporation (AOS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $255.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.33 Billion) in one year. See how much free cash does Smith AO Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Smith AO Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Smith AO Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore AOS net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Smith AO Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Smith AO Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Smith AO Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.43x | $581.80 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $670.30 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $391.40 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $641.10 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2020 | 0.43x | $562.10 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | $456.20 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | $448.90 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $326.40 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $446.60 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $344.40 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $263.90 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2013 | 0.26x | $279.60 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $143.80 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +208.3% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $55.00 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $124.80 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | $267.60 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +180.7% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $106.60 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $190.50 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $141.40 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $186.70 Million | $679.80 Million | ▲ +197.8% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $66.60 Million | $722.20 Million | ▲ +157.5% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $25.20 Million | $703.70 Million | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $115.17 Million | $713.80 Million | ▲ +172.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $49.83 Million | $842.04 Million | ▼ -58.3% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $86.76 Million | $610.78 Million | ▲ +87.3% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $48.01 Million | $632.90 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $74.66 Million | $366.34 Million | ▲ +349.4% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-25.88 Million | $316.81 Million | ▼ -119.4% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $194.08 Million | $460.35 Million | ▲ +109.7% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $115.52 Million | $574.58 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $119.47 Million | $535.11 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.21x | $115.35 Million | $553.47 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $67.70 Million | $524.30 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $57.70 Million | $467.40 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 1990 | 0.16x | $78.90 Million | $504.40 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $50.20 Million | $524.60 Million | — |