Smith AO Corporation (AOS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Smith AO Corporation (AOS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.19x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $255.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.33 Billion) in one year. Check AOS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Smith AO Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Smith AO Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore Smith AO Corporation assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Smith AO Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Smith AO Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Smith AO Corporation worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.43x | $581.80 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2023 | 0.49x | $670.30 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $391.40 Million | $1.58 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $641.10 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2020 | 0.43x | $562.10 Million | $1.31 Billion | ▲ +30.6% |
| 2019 | 0.33x | $456.20 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2018 | 0.33x | $448.90 Million | $1.35 Billion | ▲ +57.2% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $326.40 Million | $1.55 Billion | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $446.60 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +13.5% |
| 2015 | 0.29x | $344.40 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $263.90 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2013 | 0.26x | $279.60 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +96.0% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $143.80 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +208.3% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $55.00 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -57.1% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $124.80 Million | $1.23 Billion | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | $267.60 Million | $1.11 Billion | ▲ +180.7% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | $106.60 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $190.50 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $141.40 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -55.4% |
| 2005 | 0.27x | $186.70 Million | $679.80 Million | ▲ +197.8% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $66.60 Million | $722.20 Million | ▲ +157.5% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $25.20 Million | $703.70 Million | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $115.17 Million | $713.80 Million | ▲ +172.7% |
| 2001 | 0.06x | $49.83 Million | $842.04 Million | ▼ -58.3% |
| 2000 | 0.14x | $86.76 Million | $610.78 Million | ▲ +87.3% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $48.01 Million | $632.90 Million | ▼ -62.8% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $74.66 Million | $366.34 Million | ▲ +349.4% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-25.88 Million | $316.81 Million | ▼ -119.4% |
| 1996 | 0.42x | $194.08 Million | $460.35 Million | ▲ +109.7% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $115.52 Million | $574.58 Million | ▼ -10.0% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | $119.47 Million | $535.11 Million | ▲ +7.1% |
| 1993 | 0.21x | $115.35 Million | $553.47 Million | ▲ +61.4% |
| 1992 | 0.13x | $67.70 Million | $524.30 Million | ▲ +4.6% |
| 1991 | 0.12x | $57.70 Million | $467.40 Million | ▼ -21.1% |
| 1990 | 0.16x | $78.90 Million | $504.40 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $50.20 Million | $524.60 Million | — |