ASGN Inc (ASGN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ASGN Inc (ASGN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $83.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.87 Billion) in one year. See ASGN Inc (ASGN) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ASGN Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ASGN Inc across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does ASGN Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ASGN Inc (1991–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ASGN Inc. Check ASGN cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.24x | $400.00 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $456.90 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2022 | 0.18x | $307.80 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▲ +54.5% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $193.70 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | $424.80 Million | $1.69 Billion | ▲ +25.5% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $313.20 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $287.45 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -20.4% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $196.45 Million | $818.74 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $196.25 Million | $883.73 Million | ▲ +85.7% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $117.49 Million | $982.51 Million | ▼ -20.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $96.02 Million | $639.77 Million | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $110.52 Million | $621.06 Million | ▲ +147.2% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $40.70 Million | $565.30 Million | ▼ -49.6% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $23.42 Million | $163.92 Million | ▼ -35.3% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $26.86 Million | $121.63 Million | ▼ -38.6% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $42.01 Million | $116.80 Million | ▲ +86.5% |
| 2008 | 0.19x | $35.36 Million | $183.34 Million | ▲ +9.8% |
| 2007 | 0.18x | $33.66 Million | $191.65 Million | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2006 | 0.69x | $14.49 Million | $21.05 Million | ▲ +260.1% |
| 2005 | 0.19x | $3.26 Million | $17.07 Million | ▲ +154.0% |
| 2004 | -0.35x | $-6.34 Million | $17.91 Million | ▼ -191.1% |
| 2003 | 0.39x | $6.25 Million | $16.10 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2002 | 1.19x | $20.40 Million | $17.10 Million | ▼ -51.0% |
| 2001 | 2.43x | $25.48 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2000 | 2.09x | $21.41 Million | $10.27 Million | ▲ +71.1% |
| 1999 | 1.22x | $10.11 Million | $8.29 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1998 | 1.49x | $11.60 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +0.3% |
| 1997 | 1.48x | $8.30 Million | $5.60 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 1996 | 1.33x | $5.70 Million | $4.30 Million | ▲ +7.7% |
| 1995 | 1.23x | $3.20 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 1994 | 1.13x | $2.60 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 1993 | 1.67x | $2.00 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +51.5% |
| 1992 | 1.10x | $1.10 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +30.0% |
| 1991 | 0.85x | $1.10 Million | $1.30 Million | — |