CoreCard Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CoreCard Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. CoreCard Corp (CCRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.37x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.32 Million) in one year. Check CoreCard Corp cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CoreCard Corp (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CoreCard Corp from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for CoreCard Corp across 36 annual periods. Check CCRD cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CoreCard Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
CoreCard Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CoreCard Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CoreCard Corp cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.55x | $5.80 Million | $10.64 Million | ▼ -63.9% |
| 2023 | 1.51x | $16.81 Million | $11.12 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2022 | 0.94x | $9.86 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2021 | 0.62x | $8.91 Million | $14.27 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2020 | 1.63x | $20.97 Million | $12.87 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2019 | 1.52x | $10.59 Million | $6.95 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2018 | 1.97x | $6.66 Million | $3.38 Million | ▲ +285.5% |
| 2017 | -1.06x | $-2.47 Million | $2.33 Million | ▼ -190.7% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | $-1.38 Million | $3.77 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2015 | -0.75x | $-2.25 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -239.4% |
| 2014 | -0.22x | $-581.00K | $2.63 Million | ▼ -145.1% |
| 2013 | 0.49x | $1.53 Million | $3.13 Million | ▲ +618.7% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-285.00K | $3.02 Million | ▼ -172.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $397.00K | $3.06 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $581.00K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +158.6% |
| 2009 | -0.27x | $-935.00K | $3.42 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | $-3.76 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2007 | -0.59x | $-4.17 Million | $7.09 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2006 | -0.41x | $-2.93 Million | $7.07 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2005 | -0.28x | $-2.23 Million | $7.92 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2004 | -0.51x | $-3.98 Million | $7.82 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2003 | -0.49x | $-5.45 Million | $11.16 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2002 | -0.87x | $-9.08 Million | $10.45 Million | ▼ -254.6% |
| 2001 | -0.25x | $-2.02 Million | $8.23 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-410.00K | $3.38 Million | ▼ -130.0% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | $-182.00K | $3.45 Million | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1998 | -0.73x | $-5.30 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -659.0% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $1.00 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +185.7% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-500.00K | $3.30 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 1995 | -0.24x | $-1.10 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +55.9% |
| 1994 | -0.54x | $-1.90 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -414.9% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $2.50 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +201.9% |
| 1992 | -0.17x | $-2.20 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 1991 | -0.68x | $-5.40 Million | $8.00 Million | ▼ -1103.8% |
| 1990 | -0.06x | $-600.00K | $10.70 Million | ▼ -121.7% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $3.80 Million | $14.70 Million | — |