CoreCard Corp (CCRD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CoreCard Corp (CCRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.37x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.32 Million) in one year. See CoreCard Corp free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CoreCard Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CoreCard Corp across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does CoreCard Corp generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CoreCard Corp (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CoreCard Corp. Check CoreCard Corp (CCRD) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.55x | $5.80 Million | $10.64 Million | ▼ -63.9% |
| 2023 | 1.51x | $16.81 Million | $11.12 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2022 | 0.94x | $9.86 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2021 | 0.62x | $8.91 Million | $14.27 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2020 | 1.63x | $20.97 Million | $12.87 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2019 | 1.52x | $10.59 Million | $6.95 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2018 | 1.97x | $6.66 Million | $3.38 Million | ▲ +285.5% |
| 2017 | -1.06x | $-2.47 Million | $2.33 Million | ▼ -190.7% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | $-1.38 Million | $3.77 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2015 | -0.75x | $-2.25 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -239.4% |
| 2014 | -0.22x | $-581.00K | $2.63 Million | ▼ -145.1% |
| 2013 | 0.49x | $1.53 Million | $3.13 Million | ▲ +618.7% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-285.00K | $3.02 Million | ▼ -172.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $397.00K | $3.06 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $581.00K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +158.6% |
| 2009 | -0.27x | $-935.00K | $3.42 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | $-3.76 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2007 | -0.59x | $-4.17 Million | $7.09 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2006 | -0.41x | $-2.93 Million | $7.07 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2005 | -0.28x | $-2.23 Million | $7.92 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2004 | -0.51x | $-3.98 Million | $7.82 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2003 | -0.49x | $-5.45 Million | $11.16 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2002 | -0.87x | $-9.08 Million | $10.45 Million | ▼ -254.6% |
| 2001 | -0.25x | $-2.02 Million | $8.23 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-410.00K | $3.38 Million | ▼ -130.0% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | $-182.00K | $3.45 Million | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1998 | -0.73x | $-5.30 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -659.0% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $1.00 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +185.7% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-500.00K | $3.30 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 1995 | -0.24x | $-1.10 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +55.9% |
| 1994 | -0.54x | $-1.90 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -414.9% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $2.50 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +201.9% |
| 1992 | -0.17x | $-2.20 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 1991 | -0.68x | $-5.40 Million | $8.00 Million | ▼ -1103.8% |
| 1990 | -0.06x | $-600.00K | $10.70 Million | ▼ -121.7% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $3.80 Million | $14.70 Million | — |