CoreCard Corp (CCRD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CoreCard Corp (CCRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.37x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.32 Million) in one year. See CoreCard Corp free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CoreCard Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CoreCard Corp across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of CoreCard Corp to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CoreCard Corp (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CoreCard Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is CoreCard Corp worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.55x | $5.80 Million | $10.64 Million | ▼ -63.9% |
| 2023 | 1.51x | $16.81 Million | $11.12 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2022 | 0.94x | $9.86 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2021 | 0.62x | $8.91 Million | $14.27 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2020 | 1.63x | $20.97 Million | $12.87 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2019 | 1.52x | $10.59 Million | $6.95 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2018 | 1.97x | $6.66 Million | $3.38 Million | ▲ +285.5% |
| 2017 | -1.06x | $-2.47 Million | $2.33 Million | ▼ -190.7% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | $-1.38 Million | $3.77 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2015 | -0.75x | $-2.25 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -239.4% |
| 2014 | -0.22x | $-581.00K | $2.63 Million | ▼ -145.1% |
| 2013 | 0.49x | $1.53 Million | $3.13 Million | ▲ +618.7% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-285.00K | $3.02 Million | ▼ -172.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $397.00K | $3.06 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $581.00K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +158.6% |
| 2009 | -0.27x | $-935.00K | $3.42 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | $-3.76 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2007 | -0.59x | $-4.17 Million | $7.09 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2006 | -0.41x | $-2.93 Million | $7.07 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2005 | -0.28x | $-2.23 Million | $7.92 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2004 | -0.51x | $-3.98 Million | $7.82 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2003 | -0.49x | $-5.45 Million | $11.16 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2002 | -0.87x | $-9.08 Million | $10.45 Million | ▼ -254.6% |
| 2001 | -0.25x | $-2.02 Million | $8.23 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-410.00K | $3.38 Million | ▼ -130.0% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | $-182.00K | $3.45 Million | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1998 | -0.73x | $-5.30 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -659.0% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $1.00 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +185.7% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-500.00K | $3.30 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 1995 | -0.24x | $-1.10 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +55.9% |
| 1994 | -0.54x | $-1.90 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -414.9% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $2.50 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +201.9% |
| 1992 | -0.17x | $-2.20 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 1991 | -0.68x | $-5.40 Million | $8.00 Million | ▼ -1103.8% |
| 1990 | -0.06x | $-600.00K | $10.70 Million | ▼ -121.7% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $3.80 Million | $14.70 Million | — |