CoreCard Corp (CCRD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CoreCard Corp (CCRD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.37x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $6.12 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.32 Million) in one year. Explore CCRD long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CoreCard Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CoreCard Corp across 36 annual periods. Also explore CoreCard Corp (CCRD) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CoreCard Corp (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CoreCard Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of CoreCard Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.55x | $5.80 Million | $10.64 Million | ▼ -63.9% |
| 2023 | 1.51x | $16.81 Million | $11.12 Million | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2022 | 0.94x | $9.86 Million | $10.47 Million | ▲ +50.9% |
| 2021 | 0.62x | $8.91 Million | $14.27 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2020 | 1.63x | $20.97 Million | $12.87 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2019 | 1.52x | $10.59 Million | $6.95 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2018 | 1.97x | $6.66 Million | $3.38 Million | ▲ +285.5% |
| 2017 | -1.06x | $-2.47 Million | $2.33 Million | ▼ -190.7% |
| 2016 | -0.36x | $-1.38 Million | $3.77 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2015 | -0.75x | $-2.25 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -239.4% |
| 2014 | -0.22x | $-581.00K | $2.63 Million | ▼ -145.1% |
| 2013 | 0.49x | $1.53 Million | $3.13 Million | ▲ +618.7% |
| 2012 | -0.09x | $-285.00K | $3.02 Million | ▼ -172.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $397.00K | $3.06 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2010 | 0.16x | $581.00K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +158.6% |
| 2009 | -0.27x | $-935.00K | $3.42 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2008 | -0.95x | $-3.76 Million | $3.95 Million | ▼ -62.0% |
| 2007 | -0.59x | $-4.17 Million | $7.09 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2006 | -0.41x | $-2.93 Million | $7.07 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2005 | -0.28x | $-2.23 Million | $7.92 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2004 | -0.51x | $-3.98 Million | $7.82 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2003 | -0.49x | $-5.45 Million | $11.16 Million | ▲ +43.8% |
| 2002 | -0.87x | $-9.08 Million | $10.45 Million | ▼ -254.6% |
| 2001 | -0.25x | $-2.02 Million | $8.23 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-410.00K | $3.38 Million | ▼ -130.0% |
| 1999 | -0.05x | $-182.00K | $3.45 Million | ▲ +92.7% |
| 1998 | -0.73x | $-5.30 Million | $7.30 Million | ▼ -659.0% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | $1.00 Million | $7.70 Million | ▲ +185.7% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-500.00K | $3.30 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 1995 | -0.24x | $-1.10 Million | $4.60 Million | ▲ +55.9% |
| 1994 | -0.54x | $-1.90 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -414.9% |
| 1993 | 0.17x | $2.50 Million | $14.50 Million | ▲ +201.9% |
| 1992 | -0.17x | $-2.20 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +74.9% |
| 1991 | -0.68x | $-5.40 Million | $8.00 Million | ▼ -1103.8% |
| 1990 | -0.06x | $-600.00K | $10.70 Million | ▼ -121.7% |
| 1989 | 0.26x | $3.80 Million | $14.70 Million | — |