GrafTech International Ltd (EAF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
GrafTech International Ltd (EAF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-20.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.29 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of GrafTech International Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
GrafTech International Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for GrafTech International Ltd across 32 annual periods. Also explore GrafTech International Ltd equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for GrafTech International Ltd (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GrafTech International Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EAF market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-81.62 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -105.9% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-40.09 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -148.6% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $76.56 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | $324.63 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $443.04 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.32x | $563.65 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $805.32 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2018 | 0.32x | $836.60 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +2210.2% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $36.57 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▼ -63.4% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $22.82 Million | $594.89 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $51.44 Million | $611.49 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $120.90 Million | $829.28 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $116.84 Million | $897.10 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $101.40 Million | $948.06 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $76.60 Million | $828.42 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $144.92 Million | $683.46 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $170.33 Million | $315.55 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2008 | 0.57x | $248.64 Million | $438.54 Million | ▲ +226.9% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $130.77 Million | $754.00 Million | ▲ +174.7% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $64.18 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +745.4% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $7.99 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-131.00 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -411.0% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-25.00 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | $-60.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -422.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $17.00 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $94.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $80.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +421.2% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-29.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -117.5% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $172.00 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $172.00 Million | $984.00 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | $130.00 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -61.1% |
| 1994 | 0.33x | $174.00 Million | $532.00 Million | — |