GrafTech International Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
GrafTech International Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. GrafTech International Ltd (EAF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-62.55 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.39 Billion) in one year. Check GrafTech International Ltd earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of GrafTech International Ltd (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of GrafTech International Ltd from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for GrafTech International Ltd across 32 annual periods. Check GrafTech International Ltd (EAF) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
GrafTech International Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
GrafTech International Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GrafTech International Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of GrafTech International Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-81.62 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -105.9% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-40.09 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -148.6% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $76.56 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | $324.63 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $443.04 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.32x | $563.65 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $805.32 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2018 | 0.32x | $836.60 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +2210.2% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $36.57 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▼ -63.4% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $22.82 Million | $594.89 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $51.44 Million | $611.49 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $120.90 Million | $829.28 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $116.84 Million | $897.10 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $101.40 Million | $948.06 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $76.60 Million | $828.42 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $144.92 Million | $683.46 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $170.33 Million | $315.55 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2008 | 0.57x | $248.64 Million | $438.54 Million | ▲ +226.9% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $130.77 Million | $754.00 Million | ▲ +174.7% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $64.18 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +745.4% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $7.99 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-131.00 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -411.0% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-25.00 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | $-60.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -422.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $17.00 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $94.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $80.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +421.2% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-29.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -117.5% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $172.00 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $172.00 Million | $984.00 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | $130.00 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -61.1% |
| 1994 | 0.33x | $174.00 Million | $532.00 Million | — |