GrafTech International Ltd (EAF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
GrafTech International Ltd (EAF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-20.89 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.29 Billion) in one year. Explore GrafTech International Ltd (EAF) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
GrafTech International Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for GrafTech International Ltd across 32 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of GrafTech International Ltd for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for GrafTech International Ltd (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for GrafTech International Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is GrafTech International Ltd worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.06x | $-81.62 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▼ -105.9% |
| 2024 | -0.03x | $-40.09 Million | $1.30 Billion | ▼ -148.6% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $76.56 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -75.3% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | $324.63 Million | $1.27 Billion | ▼ -19.6% |
| 2021 | 0.32x | $443.04 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.32x | $563.65 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2019 | 0.36x | $805.32 Million | $2.22 Billion | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2018 | 0.32x | $836.60 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +2210.2% |
| 2017 | 0.01x | $36.57 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▼ -63.4% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $22.82 Million | $594.89 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $51.44 Million | $611.49 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $120.90 Million | $829.28 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $116.84 Million | $897.10 Million | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $101.40 Million | $948.06 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $76.60 Million | $828.42 Million | ▼ -56.4% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $144.92 Million | $683.46 Million | ▼ -60.7% |
| 2009 | 0.54x | $170.33 Million | $315.55 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2008 | 0.57x | $248.64 Million | $438.54 Million | ▲ +226.9% |
| 2007 | 0.17x | $130.77 Million | $754.00 Million | ▲ +174.7% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $64.18 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +745.4% |
| 2005 | 0.01x | $7.99 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +106.2% |
| 2004 | -0.12x | $-131.00 Million | $1.09 Billion | ▼ -411.0% |
| 2003 | -0.02x | $-25.00 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +52.6% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | $-60.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -422.0% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $17.00 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $94.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +17.7% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $80.00 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▲ +421.2% |
| 1998 | -0.02x | $-29.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -117.5% |
| 1997 | 0.12x | $172.00 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -32.9% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $172.00 Million | $984.00 Million | ▲ +37.3% |
| 1995 | 0.13x | $130.00 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -61.1% |
| 1994 | 0.33x | $174.00 Million | $532.00 Million | — |