GrafTech International Ltd Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
GrafTech International Ltd working capital to net assets ratio. GrafTech International Ltd (EAF) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of -113.5% as of June 2026. Working capital of $392.08 Million (current assets of $517.19 Million minus current liabilities of $125.11 Million) is measured against net assets of $-345.56 Million. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check tangible equity quality of GrafTech International Ltd to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of GrafTech International Ltd (1994–2025)
Working capital to net assets ratio of GrafTech International Ltd from 1994 to 2025. This chart shows how GrafTech International Ltd's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 32 annual periods from 1994 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at -113.5%, reflecting working capital of $392.08 Million against net assets of $-345.56 Million USD. See GrafTech International Ltd defensive liquidity buffer to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
GrafTech International Ltd Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
GrafTech International Ltd working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for GrafTech International Ltd from 1994 to 2025, covering 32 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see GrafTech International Ltd total assets.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -137.3% | $356.34 Million | $-259.63 Million | $484.53 Million | $128.19 Million | ▲ +492.5 pp |
| 2024 | -629.7% | $496.87 Million | $-78.90 Million | $636.80 Million | $139.93 Million | ▼ -1248.6 pp |
| 2023 | 618.9% | $484.25 Million | $78.25 Million | $674.79 Million | $190.54 Million | ▲ +447.9 pp |
| 2022 | 171.0% | $577.38 Million | $337.71 Million | $815.23 Million | $237.85 Million | ▼ -1509.6 pp |
| 2021 | 1680.6% | $393.29 Million | $23.40 Million | $627.86 Million | $234.57 Million | ▲ +1811.4 pp |
| 2020 | -130.9% | $431.07 Million | $-329.38 Million | $629.17 Million | $198.09 Million | ▼ -64.0 pp |
| 2019 | -66.9% | $462.37 Million | $-691.07 Million | $682.58 Million | $220.21 Million | ▼ -38.0 pp |
| 2018 | -28.9% | $310.92 Million | $-1.08 Billion | $638.05 Million | $327.13 Million | ▼ -158.0 pp |
| 2017 | 129.1% | $-1.82 Billion | $-1.41 Billion | $354.54 Million | $2.17 Billion | ▲ +91.3 pp |
| 2016 | 37.8% | $218.53 Million | $577.38 Million | $330.93 Million | $112.41 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2015 | 40.8% | $330.76 Million | $810.53 Million | $426.88 Million | $96.12 Million | ▲ +11.6 pp |
| 2014 | 29.2% | $293.09 Million | $1.00 Billion | $645.00 Million | $351.90 Million | ▼ -13.2 pp |
| 2013 | 42.4% | $559.78 Million | $1.32 Billion | $775.66 Million | $215.88 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2012 | 42.8% | $577.62 Million | $1.35 Billion | $823.00 Million | $245.38 Million | ▲ +8.9 pp |
| 2011 | 33.9% | $454.70 Million | $1.34 Billion | $731.95 Million | $277.25 Million | ▲ +7.5 pp |
| 2010 | 26.4% | $325.24 Million | $1.23 Billion | $545.88 Million | $220.64 Million | ▼ -16.6 pp |
| 2009 | 43.1% | $248.57 Million | $577.06 Million | $428.90 Million | $180.33 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2008 | 44.2% | $222.80 Million | $504.59 Million | $463.42 Million | $240.62 Million | ▼ -226.6 pp |
| 2007 | 270.7% | $305.11 Million | $112.70 Million | $508.79 Million | $203.68 Million | ▲ +587.1 pp |
| 2006 | -316.4% | $348.65 Million | $-110.20 Million | $569.25 Million | $220.59 Million | ▼ -182.1 pp |
| 2005 | -134.2% | $245.27 Million | $-182.71 Million | $459.69 Million | $214.41 Million | ▲ +978.8 pp |
| 2004 | -1113.0% | $256.00 Million | $-23.00 Million | $480.00 Million | $224.00 Million | ▼ -1016.1 pp |
| 2003 | -96.9% | $94.00 Million | $-97.00 Million | $388.00 Million | $294.00 Million | ▼ -66.1 pp |
| 2002 | -30.8% | $108.00 Million | $-351.00 Million | $313.00 Million | $205.00 Million | ▲ +5.7 pp |
| 2001 | -36.5% | $112.00 Million | $-307.00 Million | $322.00 Million | $210.00 Million | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2000 | -33.4% | $101.00 Million | $-302.00 Million | $361.00 Million | $260.00 Million | ▲ +4.2 pp |
| 1999 | -37.6% | $105.00 Million | $-279.00 Million | $420.00 Million | $315.00 Million | ▲ +36.5 pp |
| 1998 | -74.1% | $203.00 Million | $-274.00 Million | $578.00 Million | $375.00 Million | ▼ -46.6 pp |
| 1997 | -27.5% | $64.00 Million | $-233.00 Million | $566.00 Million | $502.00 Million | ▼ -5877.5 pp |
| 1996 | 5850.0% | $234.00 Million | $4.00 Million | $483.00 Million | $249.00 Million | ▲ +5961.5 pp |
| 1995 | -111.5% | $175.00 Million | $-157.00 Million | $403.00 Million | $228.00 Million | ▼ -190.7 pp |
| 1994 | 79.3% | $195.00 Million | $246.00 Million | $362.00 Million | $167.00 Million | — |