Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (EFR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (EFR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.40x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $41.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($104.27 Million) in one year. See Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2006–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund across 17 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (2006–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund. Check EFR cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.43x | $56.57 Million | $130.48 Million | ▲ +152.4% |
| 2024 | 0.17x | $27.86 Million | $162.20 Million | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | $61.00 Million | $137.62 Million | ▲ +1244.6% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-5.23 Million | $135.06 Million | ▼ -102.5% |
| 2021 | 1.54x | $264.74 Million | $171.46 Million | ▲ +1453.2% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $24.98 Million | $251.33 Million | ▼ -47.9% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $47.06 Million | $246.41 Million | ▲ +55.8% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $30.04 Million | $244.99 Million | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $29.45 Million | $223.45 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2016 | 0.35x | $77.81 Million | $225.29 Million | ▲ +87.2% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $40.92 Million | $221.73 Million | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $34.78 Million | $226.78 Million | ▲ +177.5% |
| 2013 | -0.20x | $-44.64 Million | $225.52 Million | ▼ -269.3% |
| 2012 | 0.12x | $23.32 Million | $199.43 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | $41.01 Million | $158.69 Million | ▼ -78.7% |
| 2007 | 1.22x | $22.92 Million | $18.85 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 2006 | 35.74x | $49.21 Million | $1.38 Million | — |