Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (EFR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (EFR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 80.3% as of April 2026. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $530.53 Million minus total liabilities of $104.27 Million yields net assets of $426.26 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Read EFR total debt and obligations for a breakdown of total debt and financial obligations.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of April 2026, the index stands at 80.3%, representing net assets of $426.26 Million against total assets of $530.53 Million USD. For live market cap and overall valuation, see EFR market cap.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund from 2006 to 2025, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. Check strategic asset allocation of Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 77.2% | $441.71 Million | $572.19 Million | $130.48 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2024 | 73.7% | $454.57 Million | $616.76 Million | $162.20 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2023 | 76.5% | $448.39 Million | $586.02 Million | $137.62 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2022 | 76.3% | $434.30 Million | $569.36 Million | $135.06 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2021 | 73.7% | $479.39 Million | $650.86 Million | $171.46 Million | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2020 | 69.5% | $573.14 Million | $824.47 Million | $251.33 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2019 | 71.2% | $610.53 Million | $856.94 Million | $246.41 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2018 | 72.4% | $642.31 Million | $887.30 Million | $244.99 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2017 | 74.6% | $656.34 Million | $879.80 Million | $223.45 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2016 | 74.1% | $643.54 Million | $868.83 Million | $225.29 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2015 | 74.8% | $659.87 Million | $881.60 Million | $221.73 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2014 | 75.4% | $696.13 Million | $922.91 Million | $226.78 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2013 | 76.0% | $713.83 Million | $939.35 Million | $225.52 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2012 | 76.8% | $659.77 Million | $859.20 Million | $199.43 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2008 | 74.9% | $473.99 Million | $632.68 Million | $158.69 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2007 | 98.1% | $992.89 Million | $1.01 Billion | $18.85 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2006 | 99.9% | $1.02 Billion | $1.02 Billion | $1.38 Million | — |