Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (EFR) — Net Asset Quality Index
Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (EFR) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 77.2% as of October 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $572.19 Million minus total liabilities of $130.48 Million yields net assets of $441.71 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Also explore EFR total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (2006–2025)
This chart shows how Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 17 annual periods from 2006 to 2025. As of October 2025, the index stands at 77.2%, representing net assets of $441.71 Million against total assets of $572.19 Million USD. See working capital to net assets of Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund (2006–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed Fund from 2006 to 2025, covering 17 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see Eaton Vance Senior Floating Rate Closed stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 77.2% | $441.71 Million | $572.19 Million | $130.48 Million | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 2024 | 73.7% | $454.57 Million | $616.76 Million | $162.20 Million | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2023 | 76.5% | $448.39 Million | $586.02 Million | $137.62 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2022 | 76.3% | $434.30 Million | $569.36 Million | $135.06 Million | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2021 | 73.7% | $479.39 Million | $650.86 Million | $171.46 Million | ▲ +4.1 pp |
| 2020 | 69.5% | $573.14 Million | $824.47 Million | $251.33 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2019 | 71.2% | $610.53 Million | $856.94 Million | $246.41 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2018 | 72.4% | $642.31 Million | $887.30 Million | $244.99 Million | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2017 | 74.6% | $656.34 Million | $879.80 Million | $223.45 Million | ▲ +0.5 pp |
| 2016 | 74.1% | $643.54 Million | $868.83 Million | $225.29 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2015 | 74.8% | $659.87 Million | $881.60 Million | $221.73 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2014 | 75.4% | $696.13 Million | $922.91 Million | $226.78 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2013 | 76.0% | $713.83 Million | $939.35 Million | $225.52 Million | ▼ -0.8 pp |
| 2012 | 76.8% | $659.77 Million | $859.20 Million | $199.43 Million | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2008 | 74.9% | $473.99 Million | $632.68 Million | $158.69 Million | ▼ -23.2 pp |
| 2007 | 98.1% | $992.89 Million | $1.01 Billion | $18.85 Million | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2006 | 99.9% | $1.02 Billion | $1.02 Billion | $1.38 Million | — |