Vaalco Energy Inc (EGY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vaalco Energy Inc (EGY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-40.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($575.76 Million) in one year. See EGY free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vaalco Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vaalco Energy Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore EGY net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vaalco Energy Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vaalco Energy Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Vaalco Energy Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | $212.67 Million | $469.69 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $113.72 Million | $453.37 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | $223.60 Million | $344.43 Million | ▲ +96.3% |
| 2022 | 0.33x | $128.85 Million | $389.54 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2021 | 0.42x | $50.12 Million | $118.79 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | $27.45 Million | $79.77 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $26.47 Million | $101.82 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2018 | 0.66x | $37.18 Million | $56.48 Million | ▲ +585.4% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $6.66 Million | $69.34 Million | ▲ +326.4% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-3.45 Million | $81.39 Million | ▼ -110.7% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $38.88 Million | $97.88 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $23.39 Million | $68.39 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2013 | 1.32x | $75.40 Million | $57.29 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2012 | 1.70x | $93.96 Million | $55.43 Million | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2011 | 2.14x | $89.58 Million | $41.95 Million | ▲ +97.8% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $45.52 Million | $42.16 Million | ▲ +110.9% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $23.49 Million | $45.89 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2008 | 1.36x | $106.58 Million | $78.24 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2007 | 1.21x | $43.23 Million | $35.83 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2006 | 1.71x | $64.44 Million | $37.72 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2005 | 2.55x | $35.90 Million | $14.06 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2004 | 1.39x | $22.79 Million | $16.43 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2003 | 1.12x | $22.63 Million | $20.15 Million | ▲ +4376.9% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $820.00K | $32.68 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $2.96 Million | $8.82 Million | ▼ -81.3% |
| 2000 | 1.80x | $10.46 Million | $5.81 Million | ▲ +636.9% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $1.05 Million | $4.31 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 1998 | -1.56x | $-15.28 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -1175.5% |
| 1997 | -0.12x | $-903.00K | $7.41 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-1.71 Million | $13.00 Million | ▼ -504.6% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $500.00K | $15.40 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $1.60 Million | $11.30 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 1993 | 0.35x | $5.90 Million | $17.10 Million | ▲ +603.0% |
| 1992 | -0.07x | $-1.90 Million | $27.70 Million | ▼ -339.4% |
| 1991 | 0.03x | $1.10 Million | $38.40 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 1990 | 0.23x | $7.40 Million | $31.70 Million | — |