Vaalco Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vaalco Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Vaalco Energy Inc (EGY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-39.23 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($575.76 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Vaalco Energy Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Vaalco Energy Inc (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Vaalco Energy Inc from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Vaalco Energy Inc across 36 annual periods. Check Vaalco Energy Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Vaalco Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Vaalco Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vaalco Energy Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Vaalco Energy Inc (EGY) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | $212.67 Million | $469.69 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $113.72 Million | $453.37 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | $223.60 Million | $344.43 Million | ▲ +96.3% |
| 2022 | 0.33x | $128.85 Million | $389.54 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2021 | 0.42x | $50.12 Million | $118.79 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | $27.45 Million | $79.77 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $26.47 Million | $101.82 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2018 | 0.66x | $37.18 Million | $56.48 Million | ▲ +585.4% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $6.66 Million | $69.34 Million | ▲ +326.4% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-3.45 Million | $81.39 Million | ▼ -110.7% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $38.88 Million | $97.88 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $23.39 Million | $68.39 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2013 | 1.32x | $75.40 Million | $57.29 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2012 | 1.70x | $93.96 Million | $55.43 Million | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2011 | 2.14x | $89.58 Million | $41.95 Million | ▲ +97.8% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $45.52 Million | $42.16 Million | ▲ +110.9% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $23.49 Million | $45.89 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2008 | 1.36x | $106.58 Million | $78.24 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2007 | 1.21x | $43.23 Million | $35.83 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2006 | 1.71x | $64.44 Million | $37.72 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2005 | 2.55x | $35.90 Million | $14.06 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2004 | 1.39x | $22.79 Million | $16.43 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2003 | 1.12x | $22.63 Million | $20.15 Million | ▲ +4376.9% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $820.00K | $32.68 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $2.96 Million | $8.82 Million | ▼ -81.3% |
| 2000 | 1.80x | $10.46 Million | $5.81 Million | ▲ +636.9% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $1.05 Million | $4.31 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 1998 | -1.56x | $-15.28 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -1175.5% |
| 1997 | -0.12x | $-903.00K | $7.41 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-1.71 Million | $13.00 Million | ▼ -504.6% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $500.00K | $15.40 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $1.60 Million | $11.30 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 1993 | 0.35x | $5.90 Million | $17.10 Million | ▲ +603.0% |
| 1992 | -0.07x | $-1.90 Million | $27.70 Million | ▼ -339.4% |
| 1991 | 0.03x | $1.10 Million | $38.40 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 1990 | 0.23x | $7.40 Million | $31.70 Million | — |