Vaalco Energy Inc (EGY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Vaalco Energy Inc (EGY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-39.23 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($575.76 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Vaalco Energy Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Vaalco Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Vaalco Energy Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore Vaalco Energy Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Vaalco Energy Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Vaalco Energy Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EGY company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | $212.67 Million | $469.69 Million | ▲ +80.5% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $113.72 Million | $453.37 Million | ▼ -61.4% |
| 2023 | 0.65x | $223.60 Million | $344.43 Million | ▲ +96.3% |
| 2022 | 0.33x | $128.85 Million | $389.54 Million | ▼ -21.6% |
| 2021 | 0.42x | $50.12 Million | $118.79 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2020 | 0.34x | $27.45 Million | $79.77 Million | ▲ +32.3% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $26.47 Million | $101.82 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2018 | 0.66x | $37.18 Million | $56.48 Million | ▲ +585.4% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $6.66 Million | $69.34 Million | ▲ +326.4% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-3.45 Million | $81.39 Million | ▼ -110.7% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $38.88 Million | $97.88 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2014 | 0.34x | $23.39 Million | $68.39 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2013 | 1.32x | $75.40 Million | $57.29 Million | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2012 | 1.70x | $93.96 Million | $55.43 Million | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2011 | 2.14x | $89.58 Million | $41.95 Million | ▲ +97.8% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $45.52 Million | $42.16 Million | ▲ +110.9% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $23.49 Million | $45.89 Million | ▼ -62.4% |
| 2008 | 1.36x | $106.58 Million | $78.24 Million | ▲ +12.9% |
| 2007 | 1.21x | $43.23 Million | $35.83 Million | ▼ -29.4% |
| 2006 | 1.71x | $64.44 Million | $37.72 Million | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2005 | 2.55x | $35.90 Million | $14.06 Million | ▲ +84.1% |
| 2004 | 1.39x | $22.79 Million | $16.43 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 2003 | 1.12x | $22.63 Million | $20.15 Million | ▲ +4376.9% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $820.00K | $32.68 Million | ▼ -92.5% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $2.96 Million | $8.82 Million | ▼ -81.3% |
| 2000 | 1.80x | $10.46 Million | $5.81 Million | ▲ +636.9% |
| 1999 | 0.24x | $1.05 Million | $4.31 Million | ▲ +115.7% |
| 1998 | -1.56x | $-15.28 Million | $9.82 Million | ▼ -1175.5% |
| 1997 | -0.12x | $-903.00K | $7.41 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-1.71 Million | $13.00 Million | ▼ -504.6% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $500.00K | $15.40 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 1994 | 0.14x | $1.60 Million | $11.30 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 1993 | 0.35x | $5.90 Million | $17.10 Million | ▲ +603.0% |
| 1992 | -0.07x | $-1.90 Million | $27.70 Million | ▼ -339.4% |
| 1991 | 0.03x | $1.10 Million | $38.40 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 1990 | 0.23x | $7.40 Million | $31.70 Million | — |