Equus Total Return Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Equus Total Return Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio. Equus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $7.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.74 Million) in one year. Check Equus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Equus Total Return Closed Fund (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Equus Total Return Closed Fund from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Equus Total Return Closed Fund across 31 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Equus Total Return Closed Fund to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Equus Total Return Closed Fund Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Equus Total Return Closed Fund cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Equus Total Return Closed Fund. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Equus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.49x | $-2.33 Million | $4.77 Million | ▼ -100.5% |
| 2024 | 89.75x | $38.23 Million | $426.00K | ▲ +8009.3% |
| 2023 | -1.13x | $-51.36 Million | $45.26 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2022 | -1.20x | $-7.70 Million | $6.43 Million | ▼ -119.0% |
| 2021 | 6.30x | $21.11 Million | $3.35 Million | ▲ +541.0% |
| 2020 | 0.98x | $24.61 Million | $25.05 Million | ▲ +624.8% |
| 2019 | -0.19x | $-5.45 Million | $29.10 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2018 | -0.45x | $-12.26 Million | $27.45 Million | ▼ -175.9% |
| 2017 | 0.59x | $10.71 Million | $18.20 Million | ▲ +189.8% |
| 2016 | -0.66x | $-19.92 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -847.0% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.33 Million | $15.22 Million | ▲ +141.3% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | $-3.37 Million | $15.84 Million | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2013 | -1.30x | $-19.62 Million | $15.13 Million | ▼ -104.1% |
| 2012 | 31.55x | $12.87 Million | $408.00K | ▲ +944.0% |
| 2011 | 3.02x | $18.60 Million | $6.15 Million | ▲ +180.5% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $16.60 Million | $15.40 Million | ▲ +162.5% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | $12.36 Million | $30.11 Million | ▲ +158.3% |
| 2008 | -0.70x | $-32.14 Million | $45.63 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2007 | -0.58x | $-18.27 Million | $31.51 Million | ▼ -131.6% |
| 2006 | 1.84x | $59.93 Million | $32.63 Million | ▲ +492.8% |
| 2005 | -0.47x | $-24.03 Million | $51.38 Million | ▼ -121.2% |
| 2004 | 2.20x | $57.27 Million | $26.00 Million | ▲ +1083.2% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $11.43 Million | $61.40 Million | ▲ +761.3% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | $-2.01 Million | $71.40 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | $-1.51 Million | $73.90 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-2.19 Million | $85.10 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 1999 | -0.04x | $-3.30 Million | $73.60 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | $-4.30 Million | $99.40 Million | ▼ -247.7% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-1.04 Million | $83.60 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-2.49 Million | $77.90 Million | ▼ -464.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $70.60 Million | — |