Equus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS) — Financial Flexibility Index
Equus Total Return Closed Fund (EQS) has a Financial Flexibility Index of -0.04x as of March 2026. Free cash flow of $-184.00K (operating CF $-196.00K minus capex $12.00K) represents 0% of total liabilities ($4.77 Million). Also explore how fast is Equus Total Return Closed Fund growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Financial Flexibility Index
Free Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Capital Expenditures
Equus Total Return Closed Fund Financial Flexibility Index (1995–2025)
Historical Financial Flexibility Index trend for Equus Total Return Closed Fund across 31 annual periods. Check EQS PP&E to net assets ratio to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Financial Flexibility Index for Equus Total Return Closed Fund (1995–2025)
Year-by-year free cash flow to debt coverage for Equus Total Return Closed Fund. For the full company profile including market capitalisation, see EQS stock market capitalisation.
| Year | Flexibility Index | Free Cash Flow (USD) | Operating CF | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.48x | $-2.29 Million | $-2.33 Million | $4.77 Million | ▼ -100.5% |
| 2024 | 89.75x | $38.23 Million | $38.23 Million | $426.00K | ▲ +8009.3% |
| 2023 | -1.13x | $-51.36 Million | $-51.36 Million | $45.26 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2022 | -1.20x | $-7.70 Million | $-7.70 Million | $6.43 Million | ▼ -119.0% |
| 2021 | 6.30x | $21.11 Million | $21.11 Million | $3.35 Million | ▲ +541.0% |
| 2020 | 0.98x | $24.61 Million | $24.61 Million | $25.05 Million | ▲ +624.8% |
| 2019 | -0.19x | $-5.45 Million | $-5.45 Million | $29.10 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2018 | -0.45x | $-12.26 Million | $-12.26 Million | $27.45 Million | ▼ -175.9% |
| 2017 | 0.59x | $10.71 Million | $10.71 Million | $18.20 Million | ▲ +189.8% |
| 2016 | -0.66x | $-19.92 Million | $-19.92 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -847.0% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.33 Million | $1.33 Million | $15.22 Million | ▲ +141.3% |
| 2014 | -0.21x | $-3.37 Million | $-3.37 Million | $15.84 Million | ▲ +83.6% |
| 2013 | -1.30x | $-19.62 Million | $-19.62 Million | $15.13 Million | ▼ -104.1% |
| 2012 | 31.55x | $12.87 Million | $12.87 Million | $408.00K | ▲ +944.0% |
| 2011 | 3.02x | $18.60 Million | $18.60 Million | $6.15 Million | ▲ +180.5% |
| 2010 | 1.08x | $16.60 Million | $16.60 Million | $15.40 Million | ▲ +162.5% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | $12.36 Million | $12.36 Million | $30.11 Million | ▲ +158.3% |
| 2008 | -0.70x | $-32.14 Million | $-32.14 Million | $45.63 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2007 | -0.58x | $-18.27 Million | $-18.27 Million | $31.51 Million | ▼ -131.6% |
| 2006 | 1.84x | $59.93 Million | $59.93 Million | $32.63 Million | ▲ +492.8% |
| 2005 | -0.47x | $-24.03 Million | $-24.03 Million | $51.38 Million | ▼ -121.2% |
| 2004 | 2.20x | $57.27 Million | $57.27 Million | $26.00 Million | ▲ +1083.2% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $11.43 Million | $11.43 Million | $61.40 Million | ▲ +761.3% |
| 2002 | -0.03x | $-2.01 Million | $-2.01 Million | $71.40 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | $-1.51 Million | $-1.51 Million | $73.90 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-2.19 Million | $-2.19 Million | $85.10 Million | ▲ +42.6% |
| 1999 | -0.04x | $-3.30 Million | $-3.30 Million | $73.60 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 1998 | -0.04x | $-4.30 Million | $-4.30 Million | $99.40 Million | ▼ -247.7% |
| 1997 | -0.01x | $-1.04 Million | $-1.04 Million | $83.60 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-2.49 Million | $-2.49 Million | $77.90 Million | ▼ -464.2% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-400.00K | $-400.00K | $70.60 Million | — |