Genesis Energy LP (GEL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Genesis Energy LP (GEL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $81.74 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.30 Billion) in one year. Explore Genesis Energy LP (GEL) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Genesis Energy LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Genesis Energy LP across 30 annual periods. Also explore Genesis Energy LP total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Genesis Energy LP (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Genesis Energy LP. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GEL company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $275.22 Million | $4.15 Billion | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $391.93 Million | $5.52 Billion | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $521.13 Million | $5.36 Billion | ▲ +33.5% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $334.39 Million | $4.59 Billion | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $337.95 Million | $3.93 Billion | ▲ +21.4% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $296.75 Million | $4.18 Billion | ▼ -20.9% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $382.29 Million | $4.26 Billion | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $390.04 Million | $4.04 Billion | ▲ +26.3% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $338.86 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▼ -8.2% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $298.34 Million | $3.58 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $289.54 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $291.05 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2013 | 0.08x | $138.39 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2012 | 0.16x | $189.30 Million | $1.19 Billion | ▲ +155.3% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $58.31 Million | $938.21 Million | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $90.46 Million | $837.47 Million | ▼ -36.5% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $90.08 Million | $529.19 Million | ▼ -6.4% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $94.81 Million | $521.21 Million | ▲ +48.0% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $33.93 Million | $276.15 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $11.26 Million | $104.90 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2005 | 0.10x | $9.49 Million | $93.57 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2004 | 0.10x | $9.70 Million | $97.40 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $4.69 Million | $94.24 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $7.42 Million | $101.72 Million | ▼ -14.5% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $16.84 Million | $197.59 Million | ▲ +607.4% |
| 2000 | 0.01x | $4.41 Million | $366.21 Million | ▼ -65.1% |
| 1999 | 0.03x | $10.10 Million | $292.50 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 1998 | 0.08x | $16.40 Million | $199.30 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 1997 | 0.09x | $20.20 Million | $224.50 Million | ▲ +4582.0% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $-800.00K | $398.50 Million | — |