Geo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geo Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Geo Group Inc (GEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-117.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.34 Billion) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Geo Group Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Geo Group Inc (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Geo Group Inc from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Geo Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Check Geo Group Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Geo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Geo Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geo Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Geo Group Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $72.61 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $242.24 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $284.93 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $296.41 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $282.63 Million | $3.56 Billion | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $441.73 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $338.14 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +19.0% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $274.48 Million | $3.21 Billion | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $381.04 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +1345.7% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-28.03 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $142.16 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $202.54 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $192.19 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $264.24 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $188.91 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $126.20 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $130.93 Million | $782.72 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $71.34 Million | $709.02 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $78.93 Million | $663.29 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $45.95 Million | $493.55 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $34.81 Million | $529.08 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $40.41 Million | $372.10 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $21.29 Million | $420.33 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $22.24 Million | $250.02 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $29.48 Million | $90.71 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $25.91 Million | $96.41 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $24.80 Million | $89.50 Million | ▲ +195.8% |
| 1998 | -0.29x | $-14.00 Million | $48.40 Million | ▼ -149.9% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $21.40 Million | $36.90 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 1996 | 0.48x | $9.10 Million | $18.80 Million | ▲ +448.6% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $1.20 Million | $13.60 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $4.00 Million | $10.60 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $3.30 Million | $14.90 Million | — |