Geo Group Inc (GEO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geo Group Inc (GEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-117.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.34 Billion) in one year. See Geo Group Inc financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Geo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Geo Group Inc across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Geo Group Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Geo Group Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geo Group Inc. Check GEO cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $72.61 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $242.24 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $284.93 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $296.41 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $282.63 Million | $3.56 Billion | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $441.73 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $338.14 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +19.0% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $274.48 Million | $3.21 Billion | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $381.04 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +1345.7% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-28.03 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $142.16 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $202.54 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $192.19 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $264.24 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $188.91 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $126.20 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $130.93 Million | $782.72 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $71.34 Million | $709.02 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $78.93 Million | $663.29 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $45.95 Million | $493.55 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $34.81 Million | $529.08 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $40.41 Million | $372.10 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $21.29 Million | $420.33 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $22.24 Million | $250.02 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $29.48 Million | $90.71 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $25.91 Million | $96.41 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $24.80 Million | $89.50 Million | ▲ +195.8% |
| 1998 | -0.29x | $-14.00 Million | $48.40 Million | ▼ -149.9% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $21.40 Million | $36.90 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 1996 | 0.48x | $9.10 Million | $18.80 Million | ▲ +448.6% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $1.20 Million | $13.60 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $4.00 Million | $10.60 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $3.30 Million | $14.90 Million | — |