Geo Group Inc (GEO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geo Group Inc (GEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-117.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.34 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of Geo Group Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Geo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Geo Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Geo Group Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Geo Group Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geo Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Geo Group Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $72.61 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $242.24 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $284.93 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $296.41 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $282.63 Million | $3.56 Billion | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $441.73 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $338.14 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +19.0% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $274.48 Million | $3.21 Billion | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $381.04 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +1345.7% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-28.03 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $142.16 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $202.54 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $192.19 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $264.24 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $188.91 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $126.20 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $130.93 Million | $782.72 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $71.34 Million | $709.02 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $78.93 Million | $663.29 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $45.95 Million | $493.55 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $34.81 Million | $529.08 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $40.41 Million | $372.10 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $21.29 Million | $420.33 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $22.24 Million | $250.02 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $29.48 Million | $90.71 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $25.91 Million | $96.41 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $24.80 Million | $89.50 Million | ▲ +195.8% |
| 1998 | -0.29x | $-14.00 Million | $48.40 Million | ▼ -149.9% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $21.40 Million | $36.90 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 1996 | 0.48x | $9.10 Million | $18.80 Million | ▲ +448.6% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $1.20 Million | $13.60 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $4.00 Million | $10.60 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $3.30 Million | $14.90 Million | — |