Geo Group Inc (GEO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Geo Group Inc (GEO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-117.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.34 Billion) in one year. See Geo Group Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Geo Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Geo Group Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore Geo Group Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Geo Group Inc (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Geo Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Geo Group Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $72.61 Million | $2.34 Billion | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $242.24 Million | $2.30 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $284.93 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $296.41 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +44.0% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $282.63 Million | $3.56 Billion | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $441.73 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $338.14 Million | $3.32 Billion | ▲ +19.0% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $274.48 Million | $3.21 Billion | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.13x | $381.04 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +1345.7% |
| 2016 | -0.01x | $-28.03 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -117.7% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $142.16 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $202.54 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $192.19 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $264.24 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +57.0% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $188.91 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2010 | 0.09x | $126.20 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $130.93 Million | $782.72 Million | ▲ +66.2% |
| 2008 | 0.10x | $71.34 Million | $709.02 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $78.93 Million | $663.29 Million | ▲ +27.8% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $45.95 Million | $493.55 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | $34.81 Million | $529.08 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $40.41 Million | $372.10 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $21.29 Million | $420.33 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2002 | 0.09x | $22.24 Million | $250.02 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 2001 | 0.32x | $29.48 Million | $90.71 Million | ▲ +20.9% |
| 2000 | 0.27x | $25.91 Million | $96.41 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 1999 | 0.28x | $24.80 Million | $89.50 Million | ▲ +195.8% |
| 1998 | -0.29x | $-14.00 Million | $48.40 Million | ▼ -149.9% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $21.40 Million | $36.90 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 1996 | 0.48x | $9.10 Million | $18.80 Million | ▲ +448.6% |
| 1995 | 0.09x | $1.20 Million | $13.60 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 1994 | 0.38x | $4.00 Million | $10.60 Million | ▲ +70.4% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $3.30 Million | $14.90 Million | — |