Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-107.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.12 Trillion) in one year. See Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. Check GHI cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $37.53 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $17.99 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $24.94 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $21.13 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $33.94 Million | $919.04 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $15.84 Million | $721.05 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $17.99 Million | $592.84 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $25.67 Million | $678.25 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $17.14 Million | $755.93 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $15.23 Million | $623.19 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $19.39 Million | $553.99 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $17.44 Million | $434.31 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $14.23 Million | $331.11 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $7.48 Million | $229.18 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $10.23 Million | $166.39 Million | ▲ +217.3% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $2.20 Million | $113.59 Million | ▲ +626.3% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $-339.35K | $92.17 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $4.45 Million | $116.90 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $4.23 Million | $100.51 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $5.64 Million | $53.45 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $3.85 Million | $71.93 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $5.51 Million | $90.22 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $6.62 Million | $78.22 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $6.03 Million | $61.48 Million | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $6.37 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $5.06 Million | $51.11 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 1999 | 0.91x | $4.77 Million | $5.24 Million | ▼ -87.5% |
| 1998 | 7.29x | $5.10 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -21.9% |
| 1997 | 9.33x | $5.60 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +12.6% |
| 1996 | 8.29x | $5.80 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1995 | 9.50x | $5.70 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -1.7% |
| 1994 | 9.67x | $5.80 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -26.8% |
| 1993 | 13.20x | $6.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +1642.4% |
| 1992 | 0.76x | $10.00 Million | $13.20 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 1991 | 0.85x | $11.20 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 1990 | 0.66x | $8.90 Million | $13.50 Million | — |