Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP cash flow-to-debt ratio. Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-107.22 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.12 Trillion) in one year. Check Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP across 36 annual periods. Check GHI cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $37.53 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $17.99 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $24.94 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $21.13 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $33.94 Million | $919.04 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $15.84 Million | $721.05 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $17.99 Million | $592.84 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $25.67 Million | $678.25 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $17.14 Million | $755.93 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $15.23 Million | $623.19 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $19.39 Million | $553.99 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $17.44 Million | $434.31 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $14.23 Million | $331.11 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $7.48 Million | $229.18 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $10.23 Million | $166.39 Million | ▲ +217.3% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $2.20 Million | $113.59 Million | ▲ +626.3% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $-339.35K | $92.17 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $4.45 Million | $116.90 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $4.23 Million | $100.51 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $5.64 Million | $53.45 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $3.85 Million | $71.93 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $5.51 Million | $90.22 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $6.62 Million | $78.22 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $6.03 Million | $61.48 Million | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $6.37 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $5.06 Million | $51.11 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 1999 | 0.91x | $4.77 Million | $5.24 Million | ▼ -87.5% |
| 1998 | 7.29x | $5.10 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -21.9% |
| 1997 | 9.33x | $5.60 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +12.6% |
| 1996 | 8.29x | $5.80 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1995 | 9.50x | $5.70 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -1.7% |
| 1994 | 9.67x | $5.80 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -26.8% |
| 1993 | 13.20x | $6.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +1642.4% |
| 1992 | 0.76x | $10.00 Million | $13.20 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 1991 | 0.85x | $11.20 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 1990 | 0.66x | $8.90 Million | $13.50 Million | — |