Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $8.63 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.12 Billion) in one year. See Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP across 36 annual periods. Also explore Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (GHI) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Greystone Housing Impact Investors LP. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GHI market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.03x | $37.53 Million | $1.12 Billion | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2024 | 0.02x | $17.99 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $24.94 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +25.3% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | $21.13 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | $33.94 Million | $919.04 Million | ▲ +68.1% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $15.84 Million | $721.05 Million | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2019 | 0.03x | $17.99 Million | $592.84 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2018 | 0.04x | $25.67 Million | $678.25 Million | ▲ +66.9% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | $17.14 Million | $755.93 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 2016 | 0.02x | $15.23 Million | $623.19 Million | ▼ -30.2% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $19.39 Million | $553.99 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2014 | 0.04x | $17.44 Million | $434.31 Million | ▼ -6.6% |
| 2013 | 0.04x | $14.23 Million | $331.11 Million | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $7.48 Million | $229.18 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2011 | 0.06x | $10.23 Million | $166.39 Million | ▲ +217.3% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $2.20 Million | $113.59 Million | ▲ +626.3% |
| 2009 | 0.00x | $-339.35K | $92.17 Million | ▼ -109.7% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $4.45 Million | $116.90 Million | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2007 | 0.04x | $4.23 Million | $100.51 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $5.64 Million | $53.45 Million | ▲ +96.9% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $3.85 Million | $71.93 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2004 | 0.06x | $5.51 Million | $90.22 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $6.62 Million | $78.22 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $6.03 Million | $61.48 Million | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $6.37 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +3.8% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $5.06 Million | $51.11 Million | ▼ -89.1% |
| 1999 | 0.91x | $4.77 Million | $5.24 Million | ▼ -87.5% |
| 1998 | 7.29x | $5.10 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -21.9% |
| 1997 | 9.33x | $5.60 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +12.6% |
| 1996 | 8.29x | $5.80 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -12.8% |
| 1995 | 9.50x | $5.70 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -1.7% |
| 1994 | 9.67x | $5.80 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -26.8% |
| 1993 | 13.20x | $6.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +1642.4% |
| 1992 | 0.76x | $10.00 Million | $13.20 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 1991 | 0.85x | $11.20 Million | $13.20 Million | ▲ +28.7% |
| 1990 | 0.66x | $8.90 Million | $13.50 Million | — |