Graham Corporation (GHM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Graham Corporation (GHM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-151.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($183.30 Million) in one year. Check Graham Corporation (GHM) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Graham Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Graham Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Graham Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Graham Corporation (1990–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Graham Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Graham Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.09x | $15.93 Million | $183.30 Million | ▼ -48.3% |
| 2025 | 0.17x | $24.32 Million | $144.53 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $28.12 Million | $128.31 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $13.91 Million | $106.98 Million | ▲ +611.1% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-2.22 Million | $87.20 Million | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-1.72 Million | $46.35 Million | ▼ -254.1% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $1.24 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $7.92 Million | $57.30 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $8.51 Million | $39.98 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $12.39 Million | $37.46 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2016 | 0.56x | $18.75 Million | $33.75 Million | ▲ +237.1% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $6.28 Million | $38.10 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $15.23 Million | $35.73 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $12.43 Million | $33.74 Million | ▲ +371.8% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $2.60 Million | $33.36 Million | ▲ +133.4% |
| 2011 | -0.23x | $-10.37 Million | $44.40 Million | ▼ -130.8% |
| 2010 | 0.76x | $30.27 Million | $39.91 Million | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $11.05 Million | $25.81 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 2008 | 0.89x | $19.70 Million | $22.18 Million | ▲ +211.8% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $5.19 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $6.53 Million | $13.45 Million | ▲ +283.8% |
| 2005 | -0.26x | $-4.48 Million | $16.95 Million | ▼ -346.4% |
| 2004 | -0.06x | $-1.04 Million | $17.64 Million | ▼ -160.8% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $1.90 Million | $19.49 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $4.46 Million | $24.07 Million | ▲ +539.3% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-822.00K | $19.47 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-1.62 Million | $17.50 Million | ▼ -167.1% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $2.40 Million | $17.40 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 1998 | 0.38x | $7.30 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $4.70 Million | $18.50 Million | ▲ +235.0% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $1.60 Million | $21.10 Million | ▲ +292.9% |
| 1995 | -0.04x | $-900.00K | $22.90 Million | ▼ -149.6% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $2.10 Million | $26.50 Million | ▲ +202.4% |
| 1993 | -0.08x | $-2.40 Million | $31.00 Million | ▼ -309.8% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $1.00 Million | $27.10 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 1991 | 0.08x | $2.20 Million | $27.40 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 1990 | 0.29x | $7.20 Million | $24.60 Million | — |