Graham Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Graham Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Graham Corporation (GHM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-12.65 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($171.76 Million) in one year. Check total reinvestment intensity of Graham Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Graham Corporation (1990–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Graham Corporation from 1990 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Graham Corporation across 37 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Graham Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Graham Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2026)
Graham Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Graham Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Graham Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.09x | $15.93 Million | $183.30 Million | ▼ -48.3% |
| 2025 | 0.17x | $24.32 Million | $144.53 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $28.12 Million | $128.31 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $13.91 Million | $106.98 Million | ▲ +611.1% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-2.22 Million | $87.20 Million | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-1.72 Million | $46.35 Million | ▼ -254.1% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $1.24 Million | $51.40 Million | ▲ +11.5% |
| 2019 | 0.02x | $1.24 Million | $57.30 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $8.51 Million | $39.98 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $12.39 Million | $37.46 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2016 | 0.56x | $18.75 Million | $33.75 Million | ▲ +237.1% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $6.28 Million | $38.10 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $15.23 Million | $35.73 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $12.43 Million | $33.74 Million | ▲ +371.8% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $2.60 Million | $33.36 Million | ▲ +133.4% |
| 2011 | -0.23x | $-10.37 Million | $44.40 Million | ▼ -130.8% |
| 2010 | 0.76x | $30.27 Million | $39.91 Million | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $11.05 Million | $25.81 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 2008 | 0.89x | $19.70 Million | $22.18 Million | ▲ +211.8% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $5.19 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $6.53 Million | $13.45 Million | ▲ +283.8% |
| 2005 | -0.26x | $-4.48 Million | $16.95 Million | ▼ -346.4% |
| 2004 | -0.06x | $-1.04 Million | $17.64 Million | ▼ -160.8% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $1.90 Million | $19.49 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $4.46 Million | $24.07 Million | ▲ +539.3% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-822.00K | $19.47 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-1.62 Million | $17.50 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 1999 | -0.09x | $-1.62 Million | $17.40 Million | ▼ -124.5% |
| 1998 | 0.38x | $7.30 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $4.70 Million | $18.50 Million | ▲ +235.0% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $1.60 Million | $21.10 Million | ▲ +292.9% |
| 1995 | -0.04x | $-900.00K | $22.90 Million | ▼ -149.6% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $2.10 Million | $26.50 Million | ▲ +202.4% |
| 1993 | -0.08x | $-2.40 Million | $31.00 Million | ▼ -309.8% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $1.00 Million | $27.10 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 1991 | 0.08x | $2.20 Million | $27.40 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 1990 | 0.29x | $7.20 Million | $24.60 Million | — |