Graham Corporation (GHM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Graham Corporation (GHM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.76 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($161.62 Million) in one year. See Graham Corporation free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Graham Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Graham Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Graham Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Graham Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Graham Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Graham Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $24.32 Million | $144.53 Million | ▼ -23.2% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $28.12 Million | $128.31 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $13.91 Million | $106.98 Million | ▲ +611.1% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-2.22 Million | $87.20 Million | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-1.72 Million | $46.35 Million | ▼ -254.1% |
| 2020 | 0.02x | $1.24 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -82.6% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $7.92 Million | $57.30 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $8.51 Million | $39.98 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $12.39 Million | $37.46 Million | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2016 | 0.56x | $18.75 Million | $33.75 Million | ▲ +237.1% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $6.28 Million | $38.10 Million | ▼ -61.3% |
| 2014 | 0.43x | $15.23 Million | $35.73 Million | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2013 | 0.37x | $12.43 Million | $33.74 Million | ▲ +371.8% |
| 2012 | 0.08x | $2.60 Million | $33.36 Million | ▲ +133.4% |
| 2011 | -0.23x | $-10.37 Million | $44.40 Million | ▼ -130.8% |
| 2010 | 0.76x | $30.27 Million | $39.91 Million | ▲ +77.3% |
| 2009 | 0.43x | $11.05 Million | $25.81 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 2008 | 0.89x | $19.70 Million | $22.18 Million | ▲ +211.8% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $5.19 Million | $18.22 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2006 | 0.49x | $6.53 Million | $13.45 Million | ▲ +283.8% |
| 2005 | -0.26x | $-4.48 Million | $16.95 Million | ▼ -346.4% |
| 2004 | -0.06x | $-1.04 Million | $17.64 Million | ▼ -160.8% |
| 2003 | 0.10x | $1.90 Million | $19.49 Million | ▼ -47.5% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $4.46 Million | $24.07 Million | ▲ +539.3% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-822.00K | $19.47 Million | ▲ +54.4% |
| 2000 | -0.09x | $-1.62 Million | $17.50 Million | ▼ -167.1% |
| 1999 | 0.14x | $2.40 Million | $17.40 Million | ▼ -63.7% |
| 1998 | 0.38x | $7.30 Million | $19.20 Million | ▲ +49.7% |
| 1997 | 0.25x | $4.70 Million | $18.50 Million | ▲ +235.0% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | $1.60 Million | $21.10 Million | ▲ +292.9% |
| 1995 | -0.04x | $-900.00K | $22.90 Million | ▼ -149.6% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $2.10 Million | $26.50 Million | ▲ +202.4% |
| 1993 | -0.08x | $-2.40 Million | $31.00 Million | ▼ -309.8% |
| 1992 | 0.04x | $1.00 Million | $27.10 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 1991 | 0.08x | $2.20 Million | $27.40 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 1990 | 0.29x | $7.20 Million | $24.60 Million | — |