Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.74x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.28 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($1.73 Million) in one year. Explore HQL long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tekla Life Sciences Investors Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tekla Life Sciences Investors across 20 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Tekla Life Sciences Investors for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tekla Life Sciences Investors (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tekla Life Sciences Investors. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.34x | $-2.32 Million | $1.73 Million | ▼ -1951937496.6% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-0.74 | $10.75 Million | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-0.62 | $2.82 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2014 | -0.07x | $-52.57K | $754.55K | ▼ -489.9% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $9.47K | $530.12K | ▼ -100.0% |
| 2012 | 52.15x | $21.11 Million | $404.67K | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2011 | 118.30x | $118.30 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +33522.1% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $1.90 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2009 | 0.79x | $13.00 Million | $16.50 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2008 | 3.69x | $11.80 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2007 | -3.36x | $-3.70 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -332.5% |
| 2006 | -0.78x | $-2.10 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2005 | -3.20x | $-3.20 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2004 | -2.46x | $-3.20 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -166.7% |
| 2003 | -0.92x | $-2.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +89.3% |
| 2002 | -8.67x | $-2.60 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -264.9% |
| 2001 | -2.38x | $-1.90 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1998 | -1.21x | $-1.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +83.8% |
| 1997 | -7.50x | $-1.50 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1996 | -2.50x | $-1.50 Million | $600.00K | — |