Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.74x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.28 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($1.73 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Tekla Life Sciences Investors to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tekla Life Sciences Investors Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tekla Life Sciences Investors across 20 annual periods. Also explore HQL shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tekla Life Sciences Investors (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tekla Life Sciences Investors. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Tekla Life Sciences Investors.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.34x | $-2.32 Million | $1.73 Million | ▼ -1951937496.6% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-0.74 | $10.75 Million | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-0.62 | $2.82 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2014 | -0.07x | $-52.57K | $754.55K | ▼ -489.9% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $9.47K | $530.12K | ▼ -100.0% |
| 2012 | 52.15x | $21.11 Million | $404.67K | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2011 | 118.30x | $118.30 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +33522.1% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $1.90 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2009 | 0.79x | $13.00 Million | $16.50 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2008 | 3.69x | $11.80 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2007 | -3.36x | $-3.70 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -332.5% |
| 2006 | -0.78x | $-2.10 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2005 | -3.20x | $-3.20 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2004 | -2.46x | $-3.20 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -166.7% |
| 2003 | -0.92x | $-2.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +89.3% |
| 2002 | -8.67x | $-2.60 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -264.9% |
| 2001 | -2.38x | $-1.90 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1998 | -1.21x | $-1.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +83.8% |
| 1997 | -7.50x | $-1.50 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1996 | -2.50x | $-1.50 Million | $600.00K | — |