Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tekla Life Sciences Investors (HQL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.51x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.22 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($2.40 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Tekla Life Sciences Investors to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tekla Life Sciences Investors Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tekla Life Sciences Investors across 20 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see HQL cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tekla Life Sciences Investors (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tekla Life Sciences Investors. Check HQL cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.34x | $-2.32 Million | $1.73 Million | ▼ -1951937496.6% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $-0.74 | $10.75 Million | ▲ +68.6% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-0.62 | $2.82 Million | ▲ +100.0% |
| 2014 | -0.07x | $-52.57K | $754.55K | ▼ -489.9% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $9.47K | $530.12K | ▼ -100.0% |
| 2012 | 52.15x | $21.11 Million | $404.67K | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2011 | 118.30x | $118.30 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +33522.1% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | $1.90 Million | $5.40 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2009 | 0.79x | $13.00 Million | $16.50 Million | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2008 | 3.69x | $11.80 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2007 | -3.36x | $-3.70 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -332.5% |
| 2006 | -0.78x | $-2.10 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +75.7% |
| 2005 | -3.20x | $-3.20 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2004 | -2.46x | $-3.20 Million | $1.30 Million | ▼ -166.7% |
| 2003 | -0.92x | $-2.40 Million | $2.60 Million | ▲ +89.3% |
| 2002 | -8.67x | $-2.60 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -264.9% |
| 2001 | -2.38x | $-1.90 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1998 | -1.21x | $-1.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▲ +83.8% |
| 1997 | -7.50x | $-1.50 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -200.0% |
| 1996 | -2.50x | $-1.50 Million | $600.00K | — |