Kirby Corporation (KEX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kirby Corporation (KEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $227.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.70 Billion) in one year. Explore KEX long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Kirby Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Kirby Corporation across 37 annual periods. Also explore Kirby Corporation asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Kirby Corporation (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kirby Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KEX company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $670.20 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $756.49 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $540.23 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $294.13 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $321.58 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $444.94 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $511.81 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $347.00 Million | $2.66 Billion | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $353.38 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $415.79 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | $521.30 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +18.8% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $438.91 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $601.03 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▲ +116.3% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $325.73 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $312.00 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | $245.25 Million | $635.80 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2009 | 0.55x | $319.88 Million | $579.87 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $245.95 Million | $682.79 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $235.75 Million | $688.17 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $150.36 Million | $660.72 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $141.98 Million | $497.82 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $126.75 Million | $480.50 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $112.23 Million | $479.90 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $72.55 Million | $465.76 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2001 | 0.29x | $96.94 Million | $333.64 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $83.30 Million | $480.58 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $72.37 Million | $403.56 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $35.45 Million | $80.69 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 1997 | 0.29x | $63.50 Million | $218.34 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $64.07 Million | $318.78 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $81.68 Million | $292.75 Million | ▲ +210.5% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $38.37 Million | $427.07 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $61.60 Million | $314.40 Million | ▲ +60.5% |
| 1992 | 0.12x | $38.40 Million | $314.50 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 1991 | 0.15x | $26.50 Million | $174.40 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 1990 | 0.19x | $29.00 Million | $156.60 Million | ▲ +90.1% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $15.50 Million | $159.10 Million | — |