Kirby Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Kirby Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Kirby Corporation (KEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $227.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.70 Billion) in one year. Check Kirby Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Kirby Corporation (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Kirby Corporation from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Kirby Corporation across 37 annual periods. Check Kirby Corporation (KEX) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Kirby Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Kirby Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Kirby Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see KEX operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $670.20 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $756.49 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +42.1% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $540.23 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +81.8% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $294.13 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $321.58 Million | $2.51 Billion | ▼ -18.3% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $444.94 Million | $2.84 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $511.81 Million | $2.71 Billion | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $347.00 Million | $2.66 Billion | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $353.38 Million | $2.01 Billion | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $415.79 Million | $1.89 Billion | ▼ -20.8% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | $521.30 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▲ +18.8% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $438.91 Million | $1.88 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $601.03 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▲ +116.3% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $325.73 Million | $1.95 Billion | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $312.00 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -46.3% |
| 2010 | 0.39x | $245.25 Million | $635.80 Million | ▼ -30.1% |
| 2009 | 0.55x | $319.88 Million | $579.87 Million | ▲ +53.1% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $245.95 Million | $682.79 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2007 | 0.34x | $235.75 Million | $688.17 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $150.36 Million | $660.72 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $141.98 Million | $497.82 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2004 | 0.26x | $126.75 Million | $480.50 Million | ▲ +12.8% |
| 2003 | 0.23x | $112.23 Million | $479.90 Million | ▲ +50.1% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $72.55 Million | $465.76 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2001 | 0.29x | $96.94 Million | $333.64 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $83.30 Million | $480.58 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $72.37 Million | $403.56 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 1998 | 0.44x | $35.45 Million | $80.69 Million | ▲ +51.0% |
| 1997 | 0.29x | $63.50 Million | $218.34 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $64.07 Million | $318.78 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 1995 | 0.28x | $81.68 Million | $292.75 Million | ▲ +210.5% |
| 1994 | 0.09x | $38.37 Million | $427.07 Million | ▼ -54.1% |
| 1993 | 0.20x | $61.60 Million | $314.40 Million | ▲ +60.5% |
| 1992 | 0.12x | $38.40 Million | $314.50 Million | ▼ -19.6% |
| 1991 | 0.15x | $26.50 Million | $174.40 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 1990 | 0.19x | $29.00 Million | $156.60 Million | ▲ +90.1% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $15.50 Million | $159.10 Million | — |