Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.79 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.42 Billion) in one year. See Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Quaker Chemical Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Quaker Chemical Corporation across 40 annual periods. Also explore KWR net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Quaker Chemical Corporation (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Quaker Chemical Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KWR market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $136.45 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $204.58 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $279.02 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +675.0% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $41.79 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $48.93 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $178.39 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +121.7% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $82.37 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $78.78 Million | $273.30 Million | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $64.76 Million | $312.51 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $73.75 Million | $279.42 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $73.43 Million | $304.27 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $54.69 Million | $300.39 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | $73.80 Million | $239.12 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $62.89 Million | $246.96 Million | ▲ +223.5% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $19.67 Million | $249.79 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $37.55 Million | $262.33 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $41.60 Million | $242.18 Million | ▲ +227.9% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $13.39 Million | $255.56 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $27.50 Million | $264.14 Million | ▲ +208.6% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $8.18 Million | $242.52 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $11.29 Million | $219.48 Million | ▲ +190.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $3.36 Million | $189.88 Million | ▼ -65.1% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $8.38 Million | $165.29 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $24.40 Million | $118.14 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $22.60 Million | $89.49 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | $21.39 Million | $94.88 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $14.20 Million | $92.90 Million | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $12.60 Million | $97.90 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $15.20 Million | $91.50 Million | ▼ -48.1% |
| 1996 | 0.32x | $28.00 Million | $87.50 Million | ▲ +287.5% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $7.30 Million | $88.40 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $4.40 Million | $73.90 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $16.80 Million | $77.60 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 1992 | 0.37x | $23.70 Million | $63.30 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $10.20 Million | $55.10 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 1990 | 0.38x | $19.70 Million | $51.90 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 1989 | 0.36x | $14.30 Million | $39.80 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 1988 | 0.31x | $11.70 Million | $38.20 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1986 | 0.27x | $8.50 Million | $31.80 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 1985 | 0.22x | $7.60 Million | $34.70 Million | — |