Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.79 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.42 Billion) in one year. Explore KWR long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Quaker Chemical Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Quaker Chemical Corporation across 40 annual periods. Also explore Quaker Chemical Corporation total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Quaker Chemical Corporation (1985–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Quaker Chemical Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see KWR company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $136.45 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $204.58 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $279.02 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +675.0% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $41.79 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $48.93 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $178.39 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +121.7% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $82.37 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $78.78 Million | $273.30 Million | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $64.76 Million | $312.51 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $73.75 Million | $279.42 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $73.43 Million | $304.27 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $54.69 Million | $300.39 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | $73.80 Million | $239.12 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $62.89 Million | $246.96 Million | ▲ +223.5% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $19.67 Million | $249.79 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $37.55 Million | $262.33 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $41.60 Million | $242.18 Million | ▲ +227.9% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $13.39 Million | $255.56 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $27.50 Million | $264.14 Million | ▲ +208.6% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $8.18 Million | $242.52 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $11.29 Million | $219.48 Million | ▲ +190.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $3.36 Million | $189.88 Million | ▼ -65.1% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $8.38 Million | $165.29 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $24.40 Million | $118.14 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $22.60 Million | $89.49 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | $21.39 Million | $94.88 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $14.20 Million | $92.90 Million | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $12.60 Million | $97.90 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $15.20 Million | $91.50 Million | ▼ -48.1% |
| 1996 | 0.32x | $28.00 Million | $87.50 Million | ▲ +287.5% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $7.30 Million | $88.40 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $4.40 Million | $73.90 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $16.80 Million | $77.60 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 1992 | 0.37x | $23.70 Million | $63.30 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $10.20 Million | $55.10 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 1990 | 0.38x | $19.70 Million | $51.90 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 1989 | 0.36x | $14.30 Million | $39.80 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 1988 | 0.31x | $11.70 Million | $38.20 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1986 | 0.27x | $8.50 Million | $31.80 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 1985 | 0.22x | $7.60 Million | $34.70 Million | — |