Quaker Chemical Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Quaker Chemical Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $29.46 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.47 Billion) in one year. Check KWR cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Quaker Chemical Corporation (1985–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Quaker Chemical Corporation from 1985 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Quaker Chemical Corporation across 40 annual periods. Check Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Quaker Chemical Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2025)
Quaker Chemical Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Quaker Chemical Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | $136.45 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $204.58 Million | $1.26 Billion | ▼ -22.4% |
| 2023 | 0.21x | $279.02 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +675.0% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | $41.79 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -13.2% |
| 2021 | 0.03x | $48.93 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -72.5% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $178.39 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +121.7% |
| 2019 | 0.05x | $82.37 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -82.2% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $78.78 Million | $273.30 Million | ▲ +39.1% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | $64.76 Million | $312.51 Million | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $73.75 Million | $279.42 Million | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $73.43 Million | $304.27 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $54.69 Million | $300.39 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | $73.80 Million | $239.12 Million | ▲ +21.2% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $62.89 Million | $246.96 Million | ▲ +223.5% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $19.67 Million | $249.79 Million | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $37.55 Million | $262.33 Million | ▼ -16.7% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $41.60 Million | $242.18 Million | ▲ +227.9% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $13.39 Million | $255.56 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $27.50 Million | $264.14 Million | ▲ +208.6% |
| 2006 | 0.03x | $8.18 Million | $242.52 Million | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $11.29 Million | $219.48 Million | ▲ +190.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $3.36 Million | $189.88 Million | ▼ -65.1% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $8.38 Million | $165.29 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $24.40 Million | $118.14 Million | ▼ -18.2% |
| 2001 | 0.25x | $22.60 Million | $89.49 Million | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | $21.39 Million | $94.88 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 1999 | 0.15x | $14.20 Million | $92.90 Million | ▲ +18.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $12.60 Million | $97.90 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $15.20 Million | $91.50 Million | ▼ -48.1% |
| 1996 | 0.32x | $28.00 Million | $87.50 Million | ▲ +287.5% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $7.30 Million | $88.40 Million | ▲ +38.7% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $4.40 Million | $73.90 Million | ▼ -72.5% |
| 1993 | 0.22x | $16.80 Million | $77.60 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 1992 | 0.37x | $23.70 Million | $63.30 Million | ▲ +102.3% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $10.20 Million | $55.10 Million | ▼ -51.2% |
| 1990 | 0.38x | $19.70 Million | $51.90 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 1989 | 0.36x | $14.30 Million | $39.80 Million | ▲ +17.3% |
| 1988 | 0.31x | $11.70 Million | $38.20 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 1986 | 0.27x | $8.50 Million | $31.80 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 1985 | 0.22x | $7.60 Million | $34.70 Million | — |