Lennar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Lennar Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.76 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.29 Billion) in one year. Check how high is Lennar Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Lennar Corporation (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Lennar Corporation from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Lennar Corporation across 37 annual periods. Check Lennar Corporation total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Lennar Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Lennar Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Lennar Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Lennar Corporation (LEN) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.02x | $216.81 Million | $12.29 Billion | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $2.40 Billion | $13.29 Billion | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $5.18 Billion | $12.53 Billion | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2022 | 0.24x | $3.27 Billion | $13.74 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $2.53 Billion | $12.21 Billion | ▼ -41.4% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $4.19 Billion | $11.84 Billion | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2019 | 0.11x | $1.48 Billion | $13.33 Billion | ▼ -9.8% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $1.71 Billion | $13.88 Billion | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $996.86 Million | $10.76 Billion | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $507.80 Million | $8.15 Billion | ▲ +225.7% |
| 2015 | -0.05x | $-419.65 Million | $8.47 Billion | ▲ +51.8% |
| 2014 | -0.10x | $-788.49 Million | $7.67 Billion | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2013 | -0.12x | $-807.71 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▼ -82.1% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-424.65 Million | $6.36 Billion | ▼ -50.7% |
| 2011 | -0.04x | $-259.13 Million | $5.85 Billion | ▼ -190.3% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $274.23 Million | $5.59 Billion | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2009 | 0.09x | $420.84 Million | $4.73 Billion | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $1.10 Billion | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +180.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $444.51 Million | $5.25 Billion | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2006 | 0.08x | $554.65 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $272.75 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $272.75 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▼ -67.7% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $580.80 Million | $3.51 Billion | ▲ +185.1% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $204.57 Million | $3.53 Billion | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2001 | 0.02x | $59.20 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $479.40 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▲ +82.3% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | $121.30 Million | $1.18 Billion | ▲ +96.2% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $63.20 Million | $1.20 Billion | ▲ +152.2% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | $-91.10 Million | $904.30 Million | ▼ -984.0% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $12.20 Million | $1.07 Billion | ▲ +172.6% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-13.10 Million | $834.60 Million | ▼ -111.7% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $101.80 Million | $759.10 Million | ▲ +242.5% |
| 1993 | -0.09x | $-68.50 Million | $728.10 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 1992 | -0.11x | $-72.30 Million | $661.00 Million | ▼ -134.0% |
| 1991 | -0.05x | $-26.70 Million | $571.10 Million | ▼ -169.6% |
| 1990 | 0.07x | $38.00 Million | $565.50 Million | ▲ +1537.2% |
| 1989 | 0.00x | $2.50 Million | $609.10 Million | — |