Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $191.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.34 Billion) in one year. Explore Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings across 37 annual periods. Also explore how large is Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $1.64 Billion | $9.76 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $1.59 Billion | $10.31 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.33 Billion | $8.83 Billion | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | 0.19x | $1.96 Billion | $10.04 Billion | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $3.11 Billion | $10.09 Billion | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $2.14 Billion | $10.61 Billion | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $1.44 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $1.31 Billion | $9.19 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.85 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $1.18 Billion | $8.73 Billion | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $982.40 Million | $9.14 Billion | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $739.00 Million | $4.46 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $818.70 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $841.40 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $855.60 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $883.60 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $862.40 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $780.90 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2007 | 0.27x | $709.70 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $632.30 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $574.20 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 0.33x | $538.10 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2003 | 0.37x | $564.30 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2002 | 0.46x | $444.90 Million | $968.70 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2001 | 0.37x | $316.00 Million | $844.20 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2000 | 0.31x | $246.70 Million | $789.50 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $180.50 Million | $856.00 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $125.10 Million | $959.70 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $144.40 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +224.7% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-186.80 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -441.6% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $47.00 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +89.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $14.70 Million | $846.70 Million | ▼ -86.5% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $57.20 Million | $444.70 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 1992 | 0.38x | $100.80 Million | $264.90 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 1991 | 1.66x | $134.00 Million | $80.50 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1990 | 0.96x | $112.40 Million | $117.50 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 1989 | 1.88x | $71.80 Million | $38.20 Million | — |