Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings cash flow-to-debt ratio. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $191.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.34 Billion) in one year. Check LH cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings across 37 annual periods. Check LH cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $1.64 Billion | $9.76 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $1.59 Billion | $10.31 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.33 Billion | $8.83 Billion | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | 0.19x | $1.96 Billion | $10.04 Billion | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $3.11 Billion | $10.09 Billion | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $2.14 Billion | $10.61 Billion | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $1.44 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $1.31 Billion | $9.19 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.85 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $1.18 Billion | $8.73 Billion | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $982.40 Million | $9.14 Billion | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $739.00 Million | $4.46 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $818.70 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $841.40 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $855.60 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $883.60 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $862.40 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $780.90 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2007 | 0.27x | $709.70 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $632.30 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $574.20 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 0.33x | $538.10 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2003 | 0.37x | $564.30 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2002 | 0.46x | $444.90 Million | $968.70 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2001 | 0.37x | $316.00 Million | $844.20 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2000 | 0.31x | $246.70 Million | $789.50 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $180.50 Million | $856.00 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $125.10 Million | $959.70 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $144.40 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +224.7% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-186.80 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -441.6% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $47.00 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +89.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $14.70 Million | $846.70 Million | ▼ -86.5% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $57.20 Million | $444.70 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 1992 | 0.38x | $100.80 Million | $264.90 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 1991 | 1.66x | $134.00 Million | $80.50 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1990 | 0.96x | $112.40 Million | $117.50 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 1989 | 1.88x | $71.80 Million | $38.20 Million | — |