Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $191.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.34 Billion) in one year. See Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings across 37 annual periods. Also explore LH shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $1.64 Billion | $9.76 Billion | ▲ +9.4% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $1.59 Billion | $10.31 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $1.33 Billion | $8.83 Billion | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | 0.19x | $1.96 Billion | $10.04 Billion | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $3.11 Billion | $10.09 Billion | ▲ +53.2% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $2.14 Billion | $10.61 Billion | ▲ +45.6% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $1.44 Billion | $10.46 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2018 | 0.14x | $1.31 Billion | $9.19 Billion | ▼ -4.2% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $1.46 Billion | $9.85 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2016 | 0.13x | $1.18 Billion | $8.73 Billion | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $982.40 Million | $9.14 Billion | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $739.00 Million | $4.46 Billion | ▼ -9.6% |
| 2013 | 0.18x | $818.70 Million | $4.47 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | $841.40 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▼ -11.6% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $855.60 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -5.7% |
| 2010 | 0.25x | $883.60 Million | $3.55 Billion | ▼ -24.7% |
| 2009 | 0.33x | $862.40 Million | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +21.0% |
| 2008 | 0.27x | $780.90 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2007 | 0.27x | $709.70 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▼ -14.1% |
| 2006 | 0.31x | $632.30 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2005 | 0.29x | $574.20 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2004 | 0.33x | $538.10 Million | $1.63 Billion | ▼ -11.0% |
| 2003 | 0.37x | $564.30 Million | $1.52 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2002 | 0.46x | $444.90 Million | $968.70 Million | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2001 | 0.37x | $316.00 Million | $844.20 Million | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2000 | 0.31x | $246.70 Million | $789.50 Million | ▲ +48.2% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $180.50 Million | $856.00 Million | ▲ +61.8% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $125.10 Million | $959.70 Million | ▼ -7.2% |
| 1997 | 0.14x | $144.40 Million | $1.03 Billion | ▲ +224.7% |
| 1996 | -0.11x | $-186.80 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▼ -441.6% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $47.00 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +89.9% |
| 1994 | 0.02x | $14.70 Million | $846.70 Million | ▼ -86.5% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $57.20 Million | $444.70 Million | ▼ -66.2% |
| 1992 | 0.38x | $100.80 Million | $264.90 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 1991 | 1.66x | $134.00 Million | $80.50 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 1990 | 0.96x | $112.40 Million | $117.50 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 1989 | 1.88x | $71.80 Million | $38.20 Million | — |