Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings tangible net worth ratio. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (LH) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 58.4% as of March 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($3.64 Billion) from net assets ($8.75 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore how fast is Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings (1989–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings from 1989 to 2025. This chart shows how Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 37 annual periods from 1989 to 2025. As of March 2026, the ratio stands at 58.4%, reflecting net assets of $8.75 Billion with intangible assets of $3.64 Billion USD. Check asset allocation strategy of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings tangible net worth ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings from 1989 to 2025, covering 37 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market cap of Laboratory Corporation of America Holdin.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 58.4% | $8.64 Billion | $3.60 Billion | $18.39 Billion | ▲ +1.6 pp |
| 2024 | 56.7% | $8.07 Billion | $3.49 Billion | $18.38 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2023 | 57.6% | $7.89 Billion | $3.34 Billion | $16.73 Billion | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 2022 | 69.1% | $10.12 Billion | $3.12 Billion | $20.16 Billion | ▲ +5.4 pp |
| 2021 | 63.7% | $10.29 Billion | $3.74 Billion | $20.39 Billion | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2020 | 58.1% | $9.46 Billion | $3.96 Billion | $20.07 Billion | ▲ +11.5 pp |
| 2019 | 46.6% | $7.56 Billion | $4.03 Billion | $18.02 Billion | ▲ +2.6 pp |
| 2018 | 44.1% | $6.99 Billion | $3.91 Billion | $16.19 Billion | ▲ +8.6 pp |
| 2017 | 35.4% | $6.72 Billion | $4.34 Billion | $16.57 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2016 | 38.4% | $5.52 Billion | $3.40 Billion | $14.25 Billion | ▲ +3.0 pp |
| 2015 | 35.4% | $5.14 Billion | $3.32 Billion | $14.29 Billion | ▼ -12.6 pp |
| 2014 | 48.0% | $2.84 Billion | $1.48 Billion | $7.30 Billion | ▲ +11.4 pp |
| 2013 | 36.6% | $2.48 Billion | $1.57 Billion | $6.95 Billion | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2012 | 39.4% | $2.75 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $6.81 Billion | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2011 | 35.8% | $2.52 Billion | $1.62 Billion | $6.17 Billion | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2010 | 36.5% | $2.63 Billion | $1.67 Billion | $6.19 Billion | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 2009 | 40.3% | $2.25 Billion | $1.34 Billion | $4.86 Billion | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2008 | 32.4% | $1.81 Billion | $1.22 Billion | $4.67 Billion | ▼ -32.0 pp |
| 2007 | 64.4% | $1.73 Billion | $613.40 Million | $4.37 Billion | ▼ -4.7 pp |
| 2006 | 69.1% | $1.98 Billion | $610.20 Million | $4.00 Billion | ▲ +81.7 pp |
| 2005 | -12.6% | $1.89 Billion | $2.12 Billion | $3.88 Billion | ▼ -18.5 pp |
| 2004 | 5.9% | $1.97 Billion | $1.86 Billion | $3.60 Billion | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2003 | 2.0% | $1.90 Billion | $1.86 Billion | $3.41 Billion | ▼ -23.9 pp |
| 2002 | 25.9% | $1.64 Billion | $1.22 Billion | $2.61 Billion | ▲ +15.1 pp |
| 2001 | 10.8% | $1.09 Billion | $968.50 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▲ +9.4 pp |
| 2000 | 1.3% | $877.40 Million | $865.70 Million | $1.67 Billion | ▲ +10.8 pp |
| 1999 | -9.5% | $734.20 Million | $803.90 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +13.3 pp |
| 1998 | -22.8% | $681.20 Million | $836.20 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▲ +12.4 pp |
| 1997 | -35.1% | $630.00 Million | $851.30 Million | $1.66 Billion | ▲ +210.1 pp |
| 1996 | -245.3% | $258.10 Million | $891.10 Million | $1.92 Billion | ▼ -122.5 pp |
| 1995 | -122.7% | $411.60 Million | $916.70 Million | $1.84 Billion | ▲ +109.8 pp |
| 1994 | -232.5% | $166.00 Million | $551.90 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▼ -132.5 pp |
| 1993 | -99.9% | $140.80 Million | $281.50 Million | $585.50 Million | ▼ -111.3 pp |
| 1992 | 11.4% | $212.50 Million | $188.30 Million | $477.40 Million | ▼ -30.2 pp |
| 1991 | 41.6% | $330.80 Million | $193.10 Million | $411.30 Million | ▼ -58.4 pp |
| 1990 | 100.0% | $256.70 Million | $0.00 | $374.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1989 | 100.0% | $330.00 Million | $0.00 | $368.20 Million | — |