L3Harris Technologies Inc (LHX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
L3Harris Technologies Inc (LHX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $546.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.48 Billion) in one year. See L3Harris Technologies Inc (LHX) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
L3Harris Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1988–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for L3Harris Technologies Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore LHX net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for L3Harris Technologies Inc (1988–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for L3Harris Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see L3Harris Technologies Inc (LHX) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.11x | $2.56 Billion | $22.42 Billion | ▲ +24.5% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | $2.10 Billion | $22.86 Billion | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $2.16 Billion | $14.90 Billion | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2021 | 0.17x | $2.69 Billion | $15.39 Billion | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $2.79 Billion | $16.12 Billion | ▲ +187.4% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $939.00 Million | $15.59 Billion | ▼ -45.0% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $751.00 Million | $6.86 Billion | ▲ +37.8% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $569.00 Million | $7.16 Billion | ▼ -23.0% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $924.00 Million | $8.95 Billion | ▲ +17.5% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $854.00 Million | $9.72 Billion | ▼ -68.0% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $849.00 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2013 | 0.25x | $833.00 Million | $3.30 Billion | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $852.90 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $833.10 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▼ -27.6% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $802.70 Million | $2.55 Billion | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2009 | 0.26x | $666.80 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $555.50 Million | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2007 | 0.20x | $438.60 Million | $2.18 Billion | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2006 | 0.23x | $334.20 Million | $1.48 Billion | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | $338.80 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2004 | 0.31x | $289.20 Million | $947.00 Million | ▲ +78.3% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $152.80 Million | $892.10 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $206.60 Million | $741.30 Million | ▲ +993.3% |
| 2001 | -0.03x | $-27.30 Million | $875.00 Million | ▼ -166.5% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $44.70 Million | $952.60 Million | ▼ -75.5% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $262.10 Million | $1.37 Billion | ▼ -31.5% |
| 1998 | 0.28x | $445.00 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +61.5% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $356.20 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▲ +21.1% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $261.80 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -26.9% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $310.10 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▲ +68.1% |
| 1994 | 0.12x | $173.10 Million | $1.49 Billion | ▼ -22.2% |
| 1992 | 0.15x | $209.30 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -23.2% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $275.20 Million | $1.42 Billion | ▲ +51.2% |
| 1990 | 0.13x | $187.40 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 1989 | 0.12x | $182.00 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +900.7% |
| 1988 | 0.01x | $19.00 Million | $1.61 Billion | — |