Cheniere Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cheniere Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Cheniere Energy Inc (LNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.58 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($36.48 Billion) in one year. Check Cheniere Energy Inc (LNG) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Cheniere Energy Inc (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Cheniere Energy Inc from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Cheniere Energy Inc across 29 annual periods. Check Cheniere Energy Inc (LNG) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Cheniere Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Cheniere Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cheniere Energy Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Cheniere Energy Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $5.54 Billion | $36.05 Billion | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $5.39 Billion | $33.80 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $8.42 Billion | $34.06 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $10.52 Billion | $41.44 Billion | ▲ +304.1% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $2.47 Billion | $39.29 Billion | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $1.26 Billion | $33.48 Billion | ▼ -31.9% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $1.83 Billion | $33.06 Billion | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $1.99 Billion | $30.06 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $1.23 Billion | $26.67 Billion | ▲ +361.3% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-404.00 Million | $22.86 Billion | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2015 | -0.03x | $-483.00 Million | $17.25 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | $-262.80 Million | $10.07 Billion | ▼ -240.0% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-52.44 Million | $6.83 Billion | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | $-107.84 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▼ -227.6% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-42.76 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -147.7% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-16.92 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | $-97.86 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | $-142.15 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | $-84.29 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-80.43 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-18.96 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +63.4% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | $-1.45 Million | $28.63 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2003 | -1.42x | $-7.56 Million | $5.33 Million | ▼ -67.3% |
| 2002 | -0.85x | $-2.76 Million | $3.26 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2001 | -1.18x | $-2.21 Million | $1.87 Million | ▼ -136.4% |
| 2000 | 3.24x | $5.20 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +4310.7% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $500.00K | $6.80 Million | ▲ +118.4% |
| 1998 | -0.40x | $-1.80 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +68.0% |
| 1997 | -1.25x | $-1.00 Million | $800.00K | — |