Cheniere Energy Inc (LNG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Cheniere Energy Inc (LNG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.08 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($38.17 Billion) in one year. Explore Cheniere Energy Inc long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cheniere Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Cheniere Energy Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore how large is Cheniere Energy Inc's balance sheet for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Cheniere Energy Inc (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Cheniere Energy Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Cheniere Energy Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $5.54 Billion | $36.05 Billion | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $5.39 Billion | $33.80 Billion | ▼ -35.4% |
| 2023 | 0.25x | $8.42 Billion | $34.06 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $10.52 Billion | $41.44 Billion | ▲ +304.1% |
| 2021 | 0.06x | $2.47 Billion | $39.29 Billion | ▲ +66.3% |
| 2020 | 0.04x | $1.26 Billion | $33.48 Billion | ▼ -31.9% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $1.83 Billion | $33.06 Billion | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2018 | 0.07x | $1.99 Billion | $30.06 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2017 | 0.05x | $1.23 Billion | $26.67 Billion | ▲ +361.3% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | $-404.00 Million | $22.86 Billion | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2015 | -0.03x | $-483.00 Million | $17.25 Billion | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2014 | -0.03x | $-262.80 Million | $10.07 Billion | ▼ -240.0% |
| 2013 | -0.01x | $-52.44 Million | $6.83 Billion | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2012 | -0.05x | $-107.84 Million | $2.38 Billion | ▼ -227.6% |
| 2011 | -0.01x | $-42.76 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -147.7% |
| 2010 | -0.01x | $-16.92 Million | $3.03 Billion | ▲ +81.9% |
| 2009 | -0.03x | $-97.86 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▲ +30.5% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | $-142.15 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2007 | -0.03x | $-84.29 Million | $2.98 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-80.43 Million | $2.46 Billion | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-18.96 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▲ +63.4% |
| 2004 | -0.05x | $-1.45 Million | $28.63 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2003 | -1.42x | $-7.56 Million | $5.33 Million | ▼ -67.3% |
| 2002 | -0.85x | $-2.76 Million | $3.26 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2001 | -1.18x | $-2.21 Million | $1.87 Million | ▼ -136.4% |
| 2000 | 3.24x | $5.20 Million | $1.60 Million | ▲ +4310.7% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $500.00K | $6.80 Million | ▲ +118.4% |
| 1998 | -0.40x | $-1.80 Million | $4.50 Million | ▲ +68.0% |
| 1997 | -1.25x | $-1.00 Million | $800.00K | — |