Mohawk Industries Inc (MHK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mohawk Industries Inc (MHK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $110.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.41 Billion) in one year. Check MHK cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mohawk Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mohawk Industries Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore MHK total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mohawk Industries Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mohawk Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Mohawk Industries Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $1.06 Billion | $5.31 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $1.13 Billion | $5.22 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $1.32 Billion | $5.93 Billion | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $669.15 Million | $6.10 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $1.31 Billion | $5.80 Billion | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $1.77 Billion | $5.79 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $1.42 Billion | $5.26 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $1.18 Billion | $5.66 Billion | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.19 Billion | $5.03 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $1.33 Billion | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $911.87 Million | $5.07 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $662.19 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $525.16 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $587.59 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +110.8% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $300.99 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $319.71 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $672.21 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $570.03 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $875.08 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $782.04 Million | $4.50 Billion | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $561.54 Million | $4.98 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $242.84 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $309.39 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2002 | 0.34x | $549.51 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $331.25 Million | $819.93 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $216.82 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $171.40 Million | $990.40 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $160.90 Million | $794.40 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $161.50 Million | $699.50 Million | ▲ +119.6% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $65.30 Million | $621.10 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 1995 | 0.18x | $113.30 Million | $628.60 Million | ▲ +361.0% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $23.10 Million | $590.80 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $29.10 Million | $401.80 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $18.10 Million | $187.90 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 1991 | 0.22x | $21.80 Million | $97.00 Million | — |