Mohawk Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mohawk Industries Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mohawk Industries Inc (MHK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $316.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.28 Billion) in one year. Check Mohawk Industries Inc (MHK) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mohawk Industries Inc (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mohawk Industries Inc from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mohawk Industries Inc across 35 annual periods. Check Mohawk Industries Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Mohawk Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Mohawk Industries Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mohawk Industries Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mohawk Industries Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $1.06 Billion | $5.31 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $1.13 Billion | $5.22 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $1.32 Billion | $5.93 Billion | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $669.15 Million | $6.10 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $1.31 Billion | $5.80 Billion | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $1.77 Billion | $5.79 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $1.42 Billion | $5.26 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $1.18 Billion | $5.66 Billion | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.19 Billion | $5.03 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $1.33 Billion | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $911.87 Million | $5.07 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $662.19 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $525.16 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $587.59 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +110.8% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $300.99 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $319.71 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $672.21 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $570.03 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $875.08 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $782.04 Million | $4.50 Billion | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $561.54 Million | $4.98 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $242.84 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $309.39 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2002 | 0.34x | $549.51 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $331.25 Million | $819.93 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $216.82 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $171.40 Million | $990.40 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $160.90 Million | $794.40 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $161.50 Million | $699.50 Million | ▲ +119.6% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $65.30 Million | $621.10 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 1995 | 0.18x | $113.30 Million | $628.60 Million | ▲ +361.0% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $23.10 Million | $590.80 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $29.10 Million | $401.80 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $18.10 Million | $187.90 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 1991 | 0.22x | $21.80 Million | $97.00 Million | — |