Mohawk Industries Inc (MHK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mohawk Industries Inc (MHK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $459.60 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.31 Billion) in one year. See Mohawk Industries Inc (MHK) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mohawk Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mohawk Industries Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Mohawk Industries Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mohawk Industries Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mohawk Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MHK market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $1.06 Billion | $5.31 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2024 | 0.22x | $1.13 Billion | $5.22 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2023 | 0.22x | $1.32 Billion | $5.93 Billion | ▲ +103.5% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | $669.15 Million | $6.10 Billion | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $1.31 Billion | $5.80 Billion | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $1.77 Billion | $5.79 Billion | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $1.42 Billion | $5.26 Billion | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $1.18 Billion | $5.66 Billion | ▼ -12.1% |
| 2017 | 0.24x | $1.19 Billion | $5.03 Billion | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $1.33 Billion | $4.45 Billion | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2015 | 0.18x | $911.87 Million | $5.07 Billion | ▲ +4.8% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $662.19 Million | $3.86 Billion | ▲ +31.4% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | $525.16 Million | $4.02 Billion | ▼ -42.6% |
| 2012 | 0.23x | $587.59 Million | $2.58 Billion | ▲ +110.8% |
| 2011 | 0.11x | $300.99 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2010 | 0.11x | $319.71 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $672.21 Million | $3.16 Billion | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2008 | 0.17x | $570.03 Million | $3.26 Billion | ▼ -20.6% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $875.08 Million | $3.97 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $782.04 Million | $4.50 Billion | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2005 | 0.11x | $561.54 Million | $4.98 Billion | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2004 | 0.14x | $242.84 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $309.39 Million | $1.87 Billion | ▼ -51.3% |
| 2002 | 0.34x | $549.51 Million | $1.61 Billion | ▼ -15.7% |
| 2001 | 0.40x | $331.25 Million | $819.93 Million | ▲ +94.0% |
| 2000 | 0.21x | $216.82 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +20.3% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $171.40 Million | $990.40 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1998 | 0.20x | $160.90 Million | $794.40 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 1997 | 0.23x | $161.50 Million | $699.50 Million | ▲ +119.6% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $65.30 Million | $621.10 Million | ▼ -41.7% |
| 1995 | 0.18x | $113.30 Million | $628.60 Million | ▲ +361.0% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $23.10 Million | $590.80 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 1993 | 0.07x | $29.10 Million | $401.80 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $18.10 Million | $187.90 Million | ▼ -57.1% |
| 1991 | 0.22x | $21.80 Million | $97.00 Million | — |