Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.97 Million) in one year. See Alpha Pro Tech Ltd free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Alpha Pro Tech Ltd worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $2.37 Million | $11.65 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | $5.70 Million | $11.51 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | $8.46 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2022 | 1.06x | $4.28 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +1260.7% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-480.00K | $5.27 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 2020 | 2.00x | $18.27 Million | $9.13 Million | ▲ +213.8% |
| 2019 | 0.64x | $3.10 Million | $4.86 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2018 | 0.97x | $2.00 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2017 | 1.43x | $4.01 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2016 | 2.09x | $6.83 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2015 | 1.98x | $5.97 Million | $3.02 Million | ▲ +1009.5% |
| 2014 | -0.22x | $-879.00K | $4.05 Million | ▼ -110.6% |
| 2013 | 2.04x | $6.09 Million | $2.98 Million | ▲ +596.9% |
| 2012 | -0.41x | $-1.01 Million | $2.47 Million | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2011 | 2.22x | $3.77 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +191.9% |
| 2010 | -2.42x | $-3.44 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 2009 | 1.14x | $7.54 Million | $6.60 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 1.42x | $3.85 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2007 | 0.78x | $2.08 Million | $2.68 Million | ▲ +713.9% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-427.00K | $3.37 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-2.04 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -233.4% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | $1.46 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | $1.29 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2002 | 1.01x | $3.03 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $1.30 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2000 | 0.92x | $2.09 Million | $2.27 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $1.70 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +872.1% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $180.00K | $2.98 Million | ▲ +115.2% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | $-1.72 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -382.0% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-298.00K | $3.63 Million | — |