Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.97 Million) in one year. See financial agility of Alpha Pro Tech Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Alpha Pro Tech Ltd.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. Check how high is Alpha Pro Tech Ltd's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $2.37 Million | $11.65 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | $5.70 Million | $11.51 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | $8.46 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2022 | 1.06x | $4.28 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +1260.7% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-480.00K | $5.27 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 2020 | 2.00x | $18.27 Million | $9.13 Million | ▲ +213.8% |
| 2019 | 0.64x | $3.10 Million | $4.86 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2018 | 0.97x | $2.00 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2017 | 1.43x | $4.01 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2016 | 2.09x | $6.83 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2015 | 1.98x | $5.97 Million | $3.02 Million | ▲ +1009.5% |
| 2014 | -0.22x | $-879.00K | $4.05 Million | ▼ -110.6% |
| 2013 | 2.04x | $6.09 Million | $2.98 Million | ▲ +596.9% |
| 2012 | -0.41x | $-1.01 Million | $2.47 Million | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2011 | 2.22x | $3.77 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +191.9% |
| 2010 | -2.42x | $-3.44 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 2009 | 1.14x | $7.54 Million | $6.60 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 1.42x | $3.85 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2007 | 0.78x | $2.08 Million | $2.68 Million | ▲ +713.9% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-427.00K | $3.37 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-2.04 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -233.4% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | $1.46 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | $1.29 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2002 | 1.01x | $3.03 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $1.30 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2000 | 0.92x | $2.09 Million | $2.27 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $1.70 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +872.1% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $180.00K | $2.98 Million | ▲ +115.2% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | $-1.72 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -382.0% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-298.00K | $3.63 Million | — |