Alpha Pro Tech Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.97 Million) in one year. Check Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Alpha Pro Tech Ltd from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd across 30 annual periods. Check APT cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Alpha Pro Tech Ltd.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $2.37 Million | $11.65 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | $5.70 Million | $11.51 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | $8.46 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2022 | 1.06x | $4.28 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +1260.7% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-480.00K | $5.27 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 2020 | 2.00x | $18.27 Million | $9.13 Million | ▲ +213.8% |
| 2019 | 0.64x | $3.10 Million | $4.86 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2018 | 0.97x | $2.00 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2017 | 1.43x | $4.01 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2016 | 2.09x | $6.83 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2015 | 1.98x | $5.97 Million | $3.02 Million | ▲ +1009.5% |
| 2014 | -0.22x | $-879.00K | $4.05 Million | ▼ -110.6% |
| 2013 | 2.04x | $6.09 Million | $2.98 Million | ▲ +596.9% |
| 2012 | -0.41x | $-1.01 Million | $2.47 Million | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2011 | 2.22x | $3.77 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +191.9% |
| 2010 | -2.42x | $-3.44 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 2009 | 1.14x | $7.54 Million | $6.60 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 1.42x | $3.85 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2007 | 0.78x | $2.08 Million | $2.68 Million | ▲ +713.9% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-427.00K | $3.37 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-2.04 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -233.4% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | $1.46 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | $1.29 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2002 | 1.01x | $3.03 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $1.30 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2000 | 0.92x | $2.09 Million | $2.27 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $1.70 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +872.1% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $180.00K | $2.98 Million | ▲ +115.2% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | $-1.72 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -382.0% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-298.00K | $3.63 Million | — |