Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($9.97 Million) in one year. Explore Alpha Pro Tech Ltd long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Alpha Pro Tech Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd across 30 annual periods. Also explore Alpha Pro Tech Ltd total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Alpha Pro Tech Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Alpha Pro Tech Ltd (APT) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $2.37 Million | $11.65 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 2024 | 0.50x | $5.70 Million | $11.51 Million | ▼ -57.9% |
| 2023 | 1.18x | $8.46 Million | $7.20 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2022 | 1.06x | $4.28 Million | $4.04 Million | ▲ +1260.7% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-480.00K | $5.27 Million | ▼ -104.6% |
| 2020 | 2.00x | $18.27 Million | $9.13 Million | ▲ +213.8% |
| 2019 | 0.64x | $3.10 Million | $4.86 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 2018 | 0.97x | $2.00 Million | $2.06 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2017 | 1.43x | $4.01 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2016 | 2.09x | $6.83 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2015 | 1.98x | $5.97 Million | $3.02 Million | ▲ +1009.5% |
| 2014 | -0.22x | $-879.00K | $4.05 Million | ▼ -110.6% |
| 2013 | 2.04x | $6.09 Million | $2.98 Million | ▲ +596.9% |
| 2012 | -0.41x | $-1.01 Million | $2.47 Million | ▼ -118.5% |
| 2011 | 2.22x | $3.77 Million | $1.69 Million | ▲ +191.9% |
| 2010 | -2.42x | $-3.44 Million | $1.42 Million | ▼ -311.8% |
| 2009 | 1.14x | $7.54 Million | $6.60 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2008 | 1.42x | $3.85 Million | $2.70 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2007 | 0.78x | $2.08 Million | $2.68 Million | ▲ +713.9% |
| 2006 | -0.13x | $-427.00K | $3.37 Million | ▲ +80.0% |
| 2005 | -0.63x | $-2.04 Million | $3.23 Million | ▼ -233.4% |
| 2004 | 0.47x | $1.46 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | $1.29 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2002 | 1.01x | $3.03 Million | $3.00 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $1.30 Million | $3.00 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2000 | 0.92x | $2.09 Million | $2.27 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 1999 | 0.59x | $1.70 Million | $2.90 Million | ▲ +872.1% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $180.00K | $2.98 Million | ▲ +115.2% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | $-1.72 Million | $4.35 Million | ▼ -382.0% |
| 1996 | -0.08x | $-298.00K | $3.63 Million | — |