Central Securities Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Central Securities Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Central Securities Corporation (CET) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 3.19x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.99 Million could theoretically repay 3% of its total liabilities ($3.14 Million) in one year. Check CET cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Central Securities Corporation (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Central Securities Corporation from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Central Securities Corporation across 30 annual periods. Check Central Securities Corporation (CET) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Central Securities Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Central Securities Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Central Securities Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see CET cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 15.01x | $47.07 Million | $3.14 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2024 | 10.97x | $37.30 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -1.8% |
| 2023 | 11.17x | $38.06 Million | $3.41 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2022 | 13.58x | $41.25 Million | $3.04 Million | ▼ -95.3% |
| 2021 | 290.33x | $57.45 Million | $197.87K | ▲ +419.2% |
| 2020 | 55.92x | $32.70 Million | $584.84K | ▲ +138.7% |
| 2019 | 23.43x | $22.50 Million | $960.38K | ▼ -88.7% |
| 2018 | 206.85x | $24.60 Million | $118.92K | ▲ +1214.6% |
| 2017 | 15.73x | $17.98 Million | $1.14 Million | ▼ -89.7% |
| 2016 | 152.88x | $22.93 Million | $150.00K | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2015 | 269.53x | $36.39 Million | $135.01K | ▲ +288.4% |
| 2014 | 69.39x | $29.59 Million | $426.46K | ▼ -58.8% |
| 2013 | 168.50x | $48.77 Million | $289.46K | ▲ +2007.8% |
| 2012 | 7.99x | $39.91 Million | $4.99 Million | ▼ -81.7% |
| 2011 | 43.72x | $29.81 Million | $681.76K | ▲ +2093.2% |
| 2010 | 1.99x | $11.13 Million | $5.58 Million | ▼ -75.1% |
| 2009 | 8.00x | $4.00 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2008 | 12.79x | $43.50 Million | $3.40 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2007 | 67.25x | $26.90 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -59.6% |
| 2006 | 166.33x | $49.90 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +181.9% |
| 2005 | 59.00x | $23.60 Million | $400.00K | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2004 | 231.67x | $69.50 Million | $300.00K | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2003 | 682.00x | $136.40 Million | $200.00K | ▲ +185.3% |
| 2002 | -799.50x | $-159.90 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -286.2% |
| 2001 | -207.00x | $-41.40 Million | $200.00K | ▼ -665.0% |
| 2000 | 36.64x | $40.30 Million | $1.10 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 1999 | 350.75x | $140.30 Million | $400.00K | ▲ +529.7% |
| 1998 | 55.70x | $55.70 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -52.1% |
| 1997 | 116.38x | $93.10 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -22.5% |
| 1996 | 150.20x | $75.10 Million | $500.00K | — |