Central Securities Corporation (CET) — Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Central Securities Corporation (CET) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 100.0% as of December 2025. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($0.00) from net assets ($1.79 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore CET shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Central Securities Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio (1996–2025)
This chart shows how Central Securities Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 30 annual periods from 1996 to 2025. As of December 2025, the ratio stands at 100.0%, reflecting net assets of $1.79 Billion with intangible assets of $0.00 USD. Check Central Securities Corporation strategic capital allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Annual Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Central Securities Corporation (1996–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Central Securities Corporation from 1996 to 2025, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see how much is Central Securities Corporation worth.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100.0% | $1.79 Billion | $0.00 | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2024 | 100.0% | $1.57 Billion | $0.00 | $1.57 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2023 | 100.0% | $1.32 Billion | $0.00 | $1.32 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2022 | 100.0% | $1.13 Billion | $0.00 | $1.14 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2021 | 100.0% | $1.33 Billion | $0.00 | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2020 | 100.0% | $1.04 Billion | $0.00 | $1.04 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2019 | 100.0% | $994.75 Million | $0.00 | $995.71 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 100.0% | $765.34 Million | $0.00 | $765.46 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2017 | 100.0% | $826.33 Million | $0.00 | $827.47 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2016 | 100.0% | $674.68 Million | $0.00 | $674.83 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2015 | 100.0% | $582.87 Million | $0.00 | $583.01 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2014 | 100.0% | $649.76 Million | $0.00 | $650.19 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2013 | 100.0% | $648.26 Million | $0.00 | $648.55 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2012 | 100.0% | $569.47 Million | $0.00 | $574.46 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2011 | 100.0% | $574.19 Million | $0.00 | $574.87 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2010 | 100.0% | $593.52 Million | $0.00 | $599.11 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2009 | 100.0% | $504.00 Million | $0.00 | $504.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2008 | 100.0% | $397.40 Million | $0.00 | $400.80 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2007 | 100.0% | $644.80 Million | $0.00 | $645.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2006 | 100.0% | $617.20 Million | $0.00 | $617.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2005 | 100.0% | $574.00 Million | $0.00 | $574.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2004 | 100.0% | $529.50 Million | $0.00 | $529.80 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2003 | 99.8% | $479.00 Million | $949.06K | $479.20 Million | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2002 | 99.6% | $361.90 Million | $1.53 Million | $362.10 Million | ▲ +0.3 pp |
| 2001 | 99.3% | $539.90 Million | $3.96 Million | $540.10 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2000 | 100.0% | $596.30 Million | $0.00 | $597.40 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1999 | 100.0% | $590.60 Million | $0.00 | $591.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1998 | 100.0% | $476.50 Million | $0.00 | $477.50 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1997 | 100.0% | $434.40 Million | $0.00 | $435.20 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 1996 | 100.0% | $356.70 Million | $0.00 | $357.20 Million | — |