Caledonia Mining Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Caledonia Mining Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Caledonia Mining Corporation (CMCL) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.16x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $20.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($128.35 Million) in one year. Check Caledonia Mining Corporation (CMCL) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Caledonia Mining Corporation (1991–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Caledonia Mining Corporation from 1991 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Caledonia Mining Corporation across 35 annual periods. Check how high is Caledonia Mining Corporation's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Caledonia Mining Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2025)
Caledonia Mining Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Caledonia Mining Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Caledonia Mining Corporation cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.59x | $76.23 Million | $128.35 Million | ▲ +61.2% |
| 2024 | 0.37x | $41.95 Million | $113.90 Million | ▲ +159.6% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $14.77 Million | $104.10 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2022 | 0.55x | $42.62 Million | $77.50 Million | ▲ +3.9% |
| 2021 | 0.53x | $30.90 Million | $58.41 Million | ▼ -66.0% |
| 2020 | 1.56x | $30.96 Million | $19.88 Million | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2019 | 0.96x | $18.06 Million | $18.84 Million | ▲ +154.4% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $17.67 Million | $46.88 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2017 | 0.60x | $24.51 Million | $40.84 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2016 | 0.73x | $23.01 Million | $31.39 Million | ▲ +139.9% |
| 2015 | 0.31x | $6.87 Million | $22.48 Million | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2014 | 0.73x | $11.81 Million | $16.16 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2013 | 0.83x | $13.79 Million | $16.56 Million | ▼ -54.6% |
| 2012 | 1.83x | $29.88 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +30.3% |
| 2011 | 1.41x | $17.07 Million | $12.13 Million | ▲ +85.2% |
| 2010 | 0.76x | $6.57 Million | $8.64 Million | ▲ +491.8% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | $-990.35K | $5.11 Million | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2008 | -1.63x | $-2.81 Million | $1.73 Million | ▼ -269.9% |
| 2007 | -0.44x | $-2.39 Million | $5.45 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2006 | -0.38x | $-2.32 Million | $6.11 Million | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2005 | -2.32x | $-5.94 Million | $2.55 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 2004 | -5.53x | $-6.83 Million | $1.24 Million | ▼ -61.0% |
| 2003 | -3.43x | $-3.75 Million | $1.09 Million | ▼ -214.8% |
| 2002 | -1.09x | $-1.28 Million | $1.17 Million | ▼ -262.6% |
| 2001 | -0.30x | $-704.15K | $2.34 Million | ▼ -845.1% |
| 2000 | -0.03x | $-76.03K | $2.39 Million | ▼ -313.7% |
| 1999 | -0.01x | $-138.09K | $17.95 Million | ▲ +71.5% |
| 1998 | -0.03x | $-714.89K | $26.45 Million | ▲ +81.7% |
| 1997 | -0.15x | $-4.05 Million | $27.46 Million | ▼ -230.2% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $3.28 Million | $28.97 Million | ▲ +635.0% |
| 1995 | -0.02x | $-499.98K | $23.60 Million | ▼ -134.9% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $2.60 Million | $42.78 Million | ▲ +103.9% |
| 1993 | -1.57x | $-1.10 Million | $698.34K | ▲ +21.4% |
| 1992 | -2.00x | $-2.41 Million | $1.21 Million | ▼ -500.0% |
| 1991 | -0.33x | $-99.90K | $299.69K | — |