Envela Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Envela Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Envela Corp (ELA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.66x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $21.16 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($32.07 Million) in one year. Check Envela Corp (ELA) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Envela Corp (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Envela Corp from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Envela Corp across 35 annual periods. Check Envela Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Envela Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Envela Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Envela Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ELA cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $2.58 Million | $28.96 Million | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $10.19 Million | $25.22 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $5.84 Million | $25.17 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2022 | 0.36x | $10.02 Million | $27.96 Million | ▲ +304.2% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $2.81 Million | $31.64 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | $6.90 Million | $23.00 Million | ▲ +973.3% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | $-542.83K | $15.81 Million | ▼ -142.1% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $375.22K | $4.60 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $248.28K | $5.56 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $381.55K | $7.01 Million | ▲ +399.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $133.85K | $12.28 Million | ▲ +263.9% |
| 2014 | -0.01x | $-85.26K | $12.82 Million | ▼ -129.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $329.80K | $14.48 Million | ▲ +162.5% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-475.18K | $13.03 Million | ▼ -106.8% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $6.65 Million | $12.36 Million | ▲ +452.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-1.80 Million | $11.77 Million | ▼ -322.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $1.32 Million | $19.22 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | $-1.07 Million | $18.75 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2007 | -0.26x | $-4.28 Million | $16.58 Million | ▼ -774.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $247.79K | $6.47 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $273.13K | $5.76 Million | ▲ +150.3% |
| 2004 | -0.09x | $-441.93K | $4.69 Million | ▼ -171.5% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $752.03K | $5.71 Million | ▲ +130.6% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $330.98K | $5.79 Million | ▲ +236.4% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-290.27K | $6.93 Million | ▼ -112.9% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | $2.73 Million | $8.42 Million | ▲ +356.5% |
| 1999 | -0.13x | $-1.10 Million | $8.70 Million | ▼ -198.6% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $500.00K | $3.90 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $1.20 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +910.5% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $100.00K | $3.20 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 1995 | -0.05x | $-100.00K | $2.10 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $200.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +183.3% |
| 1993 | -0.13x | $-200.00K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -144.4% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $300.00K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1989 | 0.25x | $700.00K | $2.80 Million | — |