Envela Corp (ELA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Envela Corp (ELA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.66x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $21.16 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($32.07 Million) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Envela Corp to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Envela Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Envela Corp across 35 annual periods. Also explore ELA shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Envela Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Envela Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Envela Corp stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $2.58 Million | $28.96 Million | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $10.19 Million | $25.22 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $5.84 Million | $25.17 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2022 | 0.36x | $10.02 Million | $27.96 Million | ▲ +304.2% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $2.81 Million | $31.64 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | $6.90 Million | $23.00 Million | ▲ +973.3% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | $-542.83K | $15.81 Million | ▼ -142.1% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $375.22K | $4.60 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $248.28K | $5.56 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $381.55K | $7.01 Million | ▲ +399.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $133.85K | $12.28 Million | ▲ +263.9% |
| 2014 | -0.01x | $-85.26K | $12.82 Million | ▼ -129.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $329.80K | $14.48 Million | ▲ +162.5% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-475.18K | $13.03 Million | ▼ -106.8% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $6.65 Million | $12.36 Million | ▲ +452.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-1.80 Million | $11.77 Million | ▼ -322.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $1.32 Million | $19.22 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | $-1.07 Million | $18.75 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2007 | -0.26x | $-4.28 Million | $16.58 Million | ▼ -774.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $247.79K | $6.47 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $273.13K | $5.76 Million | ▲ +150.3% |
| 2004 | -0.09x | $-441.93K | $4.69 Million | ▼ -171.5% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $752.03K | $5.71 Million | ▲ +130.6% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $330.98K | $5.79 Million | ▲ +236.4% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-290.27K | $6.93 Million | ▼ -112.9% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | $2.73 Million | $8.42 Million | ▲ +356.5% |
| 1999 | -0.13x | $-1.10 Million | $8.70 Million | ▼ -198.6% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $500.00K | $3.90 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $1.20 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +910.5% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $100.00K | $3.20 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 1995 | -0.05x | $-100.00K | $2.10 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $200.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +183.3% |
| 1993 | -0.13x | $-200.00K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -144.4% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $300.00K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1989 | 0.25x | $700.00K | $2.80 Million | — |