Envela Corp (ELA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Envela Corp (ELA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.66x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $21.16 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($32.07 Million) in one year. See ELA financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Envela Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Envela Corp across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Envela Corp.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Envela Corp (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Envela Corp. Check Envela Corp (ELA) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $2.58 Million | $28.96 Million | ▼ -77.9% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $10.19 Million | $25.22 Million | ▲ +74.0% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $5.84 Million | $25.17 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2022 | 0.36x | $10.02 Million | $27.96 Million | ▲ +304.2% |
| 2021 | 0.09x | $2.81 Million | $31.64 Million | ▼ -70.4% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | $6.90 Million | $23.00 Million | ▲ +973.3% |
| 2019 | -0.03x | $-542.83K | $15.81 Million | ▼ -142.1% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | $375.22K | $4.60 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 2017 | 0.04x | $248.28K | $5.56 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | $381.55K | $7.01 Million | ▲ +399.7% |
| 2015 | 0.01x | $133.85K | $12.28 Million | ▲ +263.9% |
| 2014 | -0.01x | $-85.26K | $12.82 Million | ▼ -129.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $329.80K | $14.48 Million | ▲ +162.5% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-475.18K | $13.03 Million | ▼ -106.8% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $6.65 Million | $12.36 Million | ▲ +452.0% |
| 2010 | -0.15x | $-1.80 Million | $11.77 Million | ▼ -322.8% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | $1.32 Million | $19.22 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | $-1.07 Million | $18.75 Million | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2007 | -0.26x | $-4.28 Million | $16.58 Million | ▼ -774.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $247.79K | $6.47 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $273.13K | $5.76 Million | ▲ +150.3% |
| 2004 | -0.09x | $-441.93K | $4.69 Million | ▼ -171.5% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $752.03K | $5.71 Million | ▲ +130.6% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $330.98K | $5.79 Million | ▲ +236.4% |
| 2001 | -0.04x | $-290.27K | $6.93 Million | ▼ -112.9% |
| 2000 | 0.32x | $2.73 Million | $8.42 Million | ▲ +356.5% |
| 1999 | -0.13x | $-1.10 Million | $8.70 Million | ▼ -198.6% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $500.00K | $3.90 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 1997 | 0.32x | $1.20 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +910.5% |
| 1996 | 0.03x | $100.00K | $3.20 Million | ▲ +165.6% |
| 1995 | -0.05x | $-100.00K | $2.10 Million | ▼ -142.9% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $200.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +183.3% |
| 1993 | -0.13x | $-200.00K | $1.50 Million | ▼ -144.4% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $300.00K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +20.0% |
| 1989 | 0.25x | $700.00K | $2.80 Million | — |