Empire Petroleum Corp (EP) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Empire Petroleum Corp (EP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $330.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($69.33 Million) in one year. See Empire Petroleum Corp free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Empire Petroleum Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Empire Petroleum Corp across 26 annual periods. Also explore Empire Petroleum Corp (EP) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Empire Petroleum Corp (1999–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Empire Petroleum Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see EP market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.10x | $6.16 Million | $61.10 Million | ▲ +158.8% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | $-9.89 Million | $57.66 Million | ▼ -145.9% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | $18.06 Million | $48.31 Million | ▲ +374.6% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $3.17 Million | $40.26 Million | ▲ +235.7% |
| 2020 | -0.06x | $-1.72 Million | $29.69 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | $-592.33K | $15.95 Million | ▲ +85.9% |
| 2018 | -0.26x | $-564.89K | $2.15 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2017 | -0.95x | $-235.96K | $249.59K | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2016 | -1.01x | $-81.86K | $81.36K | ▲ +93.0% |
| 2015 | -14.31x | $-116.98K | $8.18K | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2014 | -677.91x | $-154.56K | $228.00 | ▼ -56992.8% |
| 2013 | -1.19x | $-109.42K | $92.15K | ▲ +93.1% |
| 2012 | -17.29x | $-175.21K | $10.13K | ▼ -630.9% |
| 2011 | -2.37x | $-263.71K | $111.49K | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2010 | -1.32x | $-197.38K | $149.06K | ▲ +80.4% |
| 2009 | -6.75x | $-302.11K | $44.78K | ▼ -83.0% |
| 2008 | -3.69x | $-263.98K | $71.59K | ▼ -274.5% |
| 2007 | -0.98x | $-346.73K | $352.17K | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2006 | -0.58x | $-297.44K | $510.32K | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2005 | -0.37x | $-194.30K | $519.73K | ▼ -127.1% |
| 2004 | -0.16x | $-102.53K | $622.75K | ▼ -986.2% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $8.86K | $476.73K | ▲ +106.5% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | $-202.79K | $706.56K | ▼ -17131.4% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $3.29K | $1.95 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2000 | -0.44x | $-166.31K | $377.78K | ▲ +17.0% |
| 1999 | -0.53x | $-128.54 Million | $242.46 Million | — |