Empire Petroleum Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Empire Petroleum Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Empire Petroleum Corp (EP) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $330.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($69.33 Million) in one year. Check how aggressively does Empire Petroleum Corp reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Empire Petroleum Corp (1999–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Empire Petroleum Corp from 1999 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Empire Petroleum Corp across 26 annual periods. Check EP cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Empire Petroleum Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2024)
Empire Petroleum Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Empire Petroleum Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see EP cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.10x | $6.16 Million | $61.10 Million | ▲ +158.8% |
| 2023 | -0.17x | $-9.89 Million | $57.66 Million | ▼ -145.9% |
| 2022 | 0.37x | $18.06 Million | $48.31 Million | ▲ +374.6% |
| 2021 | 0.08x | $3.17 Million | $40.26 Million | ▲ +235.7% |
| 2020 | -0.06x | $-1.72 Million | $29.69 Million | ▼ -56.3% |
| 2019 | -0.04x | $-592.33K | $15.95 Million | ▲ +85.9% |
| 2018 | -0.26x | $-564.89K | $2.15 Million | ▲ +72.2% |
| 2017 | -0.95x | $-235.96K | $249.59K | ▲ +6.0% |
| 2016 | -1.01x | $-81.86K | $81.36K | ▲ +93.0% |
| 2015 | -14.31x | $-116.98K | $8.18K | ▲ +97.9% |
| 2014 | -677.91x | $-154.56K | $228.00 | ▼ -56992.8% |
| 2013 | -1.19x | $-109.42K | $92.15K | ▲ +93.1% |
| 2012 | -17.29x | $-175.21K | $10.13K | ▼ -630.9% |
| 2011 | -2.37x | $-263.71K | $111.49K | ▼ -78.6% |
| 2010 | -1.32x | $-197.38K | $149.06K | ▲ +80.4% |
| 2009 | -6.75x | $-302.11K | $44.78K | ▼ -83.0% |
| 2008 | -3.69x | $-263.98K | $71.59K | ▼ -274.5% |
| 2007 | -0.98x | $-346.73K | $352.17K | ▼ -68.9% |
| 2006 | -0.58x | $-297.44K | $510.32K | ▼ -55.9% |
| 2005 | -0.37x | $-194.30K | $519.73K | ▼ -127.1% |
| 2004 | -0.16x | $-102.53K | $622.75K | ▼ -986.2% |
| 2003 | 0.02x | $8.86K | $476.73K | ▲ +106.5% |
| 2002 | -0.29x | $-202.79K | $706.56K | ▼ -17131.4% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $3.29K | $1.95 Million | ▲ +100.4% |
| 2000 | -0.44x | $-166.31K | $377.78K | ▲ +17.0% |
| 1999 | -0.53x | $-128.54 Million | $242.46 Million | — |