Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($19.00 Million) in one year. See FSI financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Flexible Solutions International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Flexible Solutions International Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see FSI cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Flexible Solutions International Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Flexible Solutions International Inc. Check FSI cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $3.78 Million | $19.00 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $5.57 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $6.99 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +349.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $1.48 Million | $16.35 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | $4.54 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2020 | 0.50x | $5.71 Million | $11.32 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $2.37 Million | $11.92 Million | ▲ +204.1% |
| 2018 | -0.19x | $-2.23 Million | $11.67 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $1.04 Million | $2.85 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | $1.78 Million | $2.69 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $2.74 Million | $2.11 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $1.06 Million | $2.86 Million | ▲ +131.9% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $479.96K | $3.00 Million | ▲ +306.6% |
| 2012 | -0.08x | $-307.25K | $3.97 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2011 | -0.21x | $-798.80K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -157.7% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $1.32 Million | $3.71 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | $788.31K | $3.19 Million | ▲ +300.4% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-286.17K | $2.32 Million | ▼ -555.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $26.94K | $994.75K | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $17.54K | $443.59K | ▲ +104.4% |
| 2005 | -0.90x | $-622.03K | $691.11K | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | $-1.97 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2003 | -2.24x | $-369.54K | $165.34K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2002 | -6.66x | $-353.70K | $53.15K | ▼ -447.9% |
| 2001 | 1.91x | $74.04K | $38.70K | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2000 | 1.53x | $158.13K | $103.02K | ▲ +422.4% |
| 1999 | -0.48x | $-49.15K | $103.23K | — |