Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($19.00 Million) in one year. See Flexible Solutions International Inc free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Flexible Solutions International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Flexible Solutions International Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore Flexible Solutions International Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Flexible Solutions International Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Flexible Solutions International Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Flexible Solutions International Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $3.78 Million | $19.00 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $5.57 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $6.99 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +349.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $1.48 Million | $16.35 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | $4.54 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2020 | 0.50x | $5.71 Million | $11.32 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $2.37 Million | $11.92 Million | ▲ +204.1% |
| 2018 | -0.19x | $-2.23 Million | $11.67 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $1.04 Million | $2.85 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | $1.78 Million | $2.69 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $2.74 Million | $2.11 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $1.06 Million | $2.86 Million | ▲ +131.9% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $479.96K | $3.00 Million | ▲ +306.6% |
| 2012 | -0.08x | $-307.25K | $3.97 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2011 | -0.21x | $-798.80K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -157.7% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $1.32 Million | $3.71 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | $788.31K | $3.19 Million | ▲ +300.4% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-286.17K | $2.32 Million | ▼ -555.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $26.94K | $994.75K | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $17.54K | $443.59K | ▲ +104.4% |
| 2005 | -0.90x | $-622.03K | $691.11K | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | $-1.97 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2003 | -2.24x | $-369.54K | $165.34K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2002 | -6.66x | $-353.70K | $53.15K | ▼ -447.9% |
| 2001 | 1.91x | $74.04K | $38.70K | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2000 | 1.53x | $158.13K | $103.02K | ▲ +422.4% |
| 1999 | -0.48x | $-49.15K | $103.23K | — |