Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($19.00 Million) in one year. Explore FSI long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Flexible Solutions International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Flexible Solutions International Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore FSI total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Flexible Solutions International Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Flexible Solutions International Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $3.78 Million | $19.00 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $5.57 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $6.99 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +349.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $1.48 Million | $16.35 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | $4.54 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2020 | 0.50x | $5.71 Million | $11.32 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $2.37 Million | $11.92 Million | ▲ +204.1% |
| 2018 | -0.19x | $-2.23 Million | $11.67 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $1.04 Million | $2.85 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | $1.78 Million | $2.69 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $2.74 Million | $2.11 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $1.06 Million | $2.86 Million | ▲ +131.9% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $479.96K | $3.00 Million | ▲ +306.6% |
| 2012 | -0.08x | $-307.25K | $3.97 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2011 | -0.21x | $-798.80K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -157.7% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $1.32 Million | $3.71 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | $788.31K | $3.19 Million | ▲ +300.4% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-286.17K | $2.32 Million | ▼ -555.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $26.94K | $994.75K | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $17.54K | $443.59K | ▲ +104.4% |
| 2005 | -0.90x | $-622.03K | $691.11K | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | $-1.97 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2003 | -2.24x | $-369.54K | $165.34K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2002 | -6.66x | $-353.70K | $53.15K | ▼ -447.9% |
| 2001 | 1.91x | $74.04K | $38.70K | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2000 | 1.53x | $158.13K | $103.02K | ▲ +422.4% |
| 1999 | -0.48x | $-49.15K | $103.23K | — |