Flexible Solutions International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Flexible Solutions International Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.16x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.98 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($19.00 Million) in one year. Check FSI total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Flexible Solutions International Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Flexible Solutions International Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Flexible Solutions International Inc across 27 annual periods. Check FSI operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Flexible Solutions International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Flexible Solutions International Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Flexible Solutions International Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Flexible Solutions International Inc (FSI) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.20x | $3.78 Million | $19.00 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2024 | 0.30x | $5.57 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -26.3% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $6.99 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +349.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $1.48 Million | $16.35 Million | ▼ -76.4% |
| 2021 | 0.38x | $4.54 Million | $11.85 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2020 | 0.50x | $5.71 Million | $11.32 Million | ▲ +153.5% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $2.37 Million | $11.92 Million | ▲ +204.1% |
| 2018 | -0.19x | $-2.23 Million | $11.67 Million | ▼ -152.3% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $1.04 Million | $2.85 Million | ▼ -44.5% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | $1.78 Million | $2.69 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2015 | 1.29x | $2.74 Million | $2.11 Million | ▲ +248.9% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $1.06 Million | $2.86 Million | ▲ +131.9% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $479.96K | $3.00 Million | ▲ +306.6% |
| 2012 | -0.08x | $-307.25K | $3.97 Million | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2011 | -0.21x | $-798.80K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -157.7% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $1.32 Million | $3.71 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2009 | 0.25x | $788.31K | $3.19 Million | ▲ +300.4% |
| 2008 | -0.12x | $-286.17K | $2.32 Million | ▼ -555.8% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $26.94K | $994.75K | ▼ -31.5% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $17.54K | $443.59K | ▲ +104.4% |
| 2005 | -0.90x | $-622.03K | $691.11K | ▼ -55.7% |
| 2004 | -0.58x | $-1.97 Million | $3.40 Million | ▲ +74.1% |
| 2003 | -2.24x | $-369.54K | $165.34K | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2002 | -6.66x | $-353.70K | $53.15K | ▼ -447.9% |
| 2001 | 1.91x | $74.04K | $38.70K | ▲ +24.6% |
| 2000 | 1.53x | $158.13K | $103.02K | ▲ +422.4% |
| 1999 | -0.48x | $-49.15K | $103.23K | — |