New Concept Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
New Concept Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. New Concept Energy Inc (GBR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-65.00K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($64.00K) in one year. Check how high is New Concept Energy Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of New Concept Energy Inc (1992–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of New Concept Energy Inc from 1992 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for New Concept Energy Inc across 34 annual periods. Check how aggressively does New Concept Energy Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
New Concept Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1992–2025)
New Concept Energy Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1992 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for New Concept Energy Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does New Concept Energy Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $20.00K | $69.00K | ▲ +125.8% |
| 2024 | -1.12x | $-64.00K | $57.00K | ▼ -482.8% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $22.00K | $75.00K | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2022 | 2.92x | $184.00K | $63.00K | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2021 | 2.05x | $123.00K | $60.00K | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2020 | -1.87x | $-535.00K | $286.00K | ▼ -2546.3% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-239.00K | $3.38 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2018 | -0.20x | $-637.00K | $3.12 Million | ▼ -460.6% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $202.00K | $3.57 Million | ▲ +162.3% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-314.00K | $3.46 Million | ▼ -181.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $579.00K | $5.20 Million | ▲ +336.0% |
| 2014 | -0.05x | $-282.00K | $5.98 Million | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2013 | 0.26x | $1.60 Million | $6.24 Million | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $501.00K | $5.84 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $566.00K | $6.97 Million | ▲ +352.4% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $104.00K | $5.80 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $736.00K | $6.84 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $427.00K | $3.57 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $527.00K | $7.64 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | $-640.00K | $7.62 Million | ▼ -557.1% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $355.00K | $19.33 Million | ▲ +131.3% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $370.00K | $46.60 Million | ▲ +125.4% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-486.00K | $15.58 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | $-3.88 Million | $11.27 Million | ▼ -363.9% |
| 2001 | -0.07x | $-2.58 Million | $34.75 Million | ▼ -3057.4% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $241.00K | $95.93 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $408.00K | $97.19 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-5.60 Million | $100.30 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | $-6.50 Million | $88.70 Million | ▼ -436.3% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-1.10 Million | $80.50 Million | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1995 | -0.53x | $-2.60 Million | $4.90 Million | ▼ -231.3% |
| 1994 | -0.16x | $-3.70 Million | $23.10 Million | ▼ -279.5% |
| 1993 | -0.04x | $-2.30 Million | $54.50 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 1992 | -0.13x | $-2.10 Million | $15.60 Million | — |