New Concept Energy Inc (GBR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
New Concept Energy Inc (GBR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-65.00K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($64.00K) in one year. See financial flexibility index of New Concept Energy Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
New Concept Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for New Concept Energy Inc across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see GBR operating cash flow.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for New Concept Energy Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for New Concept Energy Inc. Check GBR cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $20.00K | $69.00K | ▲ +125.8% |
| 2024 | -1.12x | $-64.00K | $57.00K | ▼ -482.8% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $22.00K | $75.00K | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2022 | 2.92x | $184.00K | $63.00K | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2021 | 2.05x | $123.00K | $60.00K | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2020 | -1.87x | $-535.00K | $286.00K | ▼ -2546.3% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-239.00K | $3.38 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2018 | -0.20x | $-637.00K | $3.12 Million | ▼ -460.6% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $202.00K | $3.57 Million | ▲ +162.3% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-314.00K | $3.46 Million | ▼ -181.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $579.00K | $5.20 Million | ▲ +336.0% |
| 2014 | -0.05x | $-282.00K | $5.98 Million | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2013 | 0.26x | $1.60 Million | $6.24 Million | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $501.00K | $5.84 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $566.00K | $6.97 Million | ▲ +352.4% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $104.00K | $5.80 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $736.00K | $6.84 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $427.00K | $3.57 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $527.00K | $7.64 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | $-640.00K | $7.62 Million | ▼ -557.1% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $355.00K | $19.33 Million | ▲ +131.3% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $370.00K | $46.60 Million | ▲ +125.4% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-486.00K | $15.58 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | $-3.88 Million | $11.27 Million | ▼ -363.9% |
| 2001 | -0.07x | $-2.58 Million | $34.75 Million | ▼ -3057.4% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $241.00K | $95.93 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $408.00K | $97.19 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-5.60 Million | $100.30 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | $-6.50 Million | $88.70 Million | ▼ -436.3% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-1.10 Million | $80.50 Million | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1995 | -0.53x | $-2.60 Million | $4.90 Million | ▼ -231.3% |
| 1994 | -0.16x | $-3.70 Million | $23.10 Million | ▼ -279.5% |
| 1993 | -0.04x | $-2.30 Million | $54.50 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 1992 | -0.13x | $-2.10 Million | $15.60 Million | — |