New Concept Energy Inc (GBR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
New Concept Energy Inc (GBR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-65.00K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($64.00K) in one year. See GBR free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
New Concept Energy Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for New Concept Energy Inc across 34 annual periods. Also explore New Concept Energy Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for New Concept Energy Inc (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for New Concept Energy Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see New Concept Energy Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.29x | $20.00K | $69.00K | ▲ +125.8% |
| 2024 | -1.12x | $-64.00K | $57.00K | ▼ -482.8% |
| 2023 | 0.29x | $22.00K | $75.00K | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2022 | 2.92x | $184.00K | $63.00K | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2021 | 2.05x | $123.00K | $60.00K | ▲ +209.6% |
| 2020 | -1.87x | $-535.00K | $286.00K | ▼ -2546.3% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-239.00K | $3.38 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2018 | -0.20x | $-637.00K | $3.12 Million | ▼ -460.6% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $202.00K | $3.57 Million | ▲ +162.3% |
| 2016 | -0.09x | $-314.00K | $3.46 Million | ▼ -181.6% |
| 2015 | 0.11x | $579.00K | $5.20 Million | ▲ +336.0% |
| 2014 | -0.05x | $-282.00K | $5.98 Million | ▼ -118.4% |
| 2013 | 0.26x | $1.60 Million | $6.24 Million | ▲ +199.4% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $501.00K | $5.84 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2011 | 0.08x | $566.00K | $6.97 Million | ▲ +352.4% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | $104.00K | $5.80 Million | ▼ -83.3% |
| 2009 | 0.11x | $736.00K | $6.84 Million | ▼ -10.1% |
| 2008 | 0.12x | $427.00K | $3.57 Million | ▲ +73.7% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | $527.00K | $7.64 Million | ▲ +182.1% |
| 2006 | -0.08x | $-640.00K | $7.62 Million | ▼ -557.1% |
| 2005 | 0.02x | $355.00K | $19.33 Million | ▲ +131.3% |
| 2004 | 0.01x | $370.00K | $46.60 Million | ▲ +125.4% |
| 2003 | -0.03x | $-486.00K | $15.58 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | $-3.88 Million | $11.27 Million | ▼ -363.9% |
| 2001 | -0.07x | $-2.58 Million | $34.75 Million | ▼ -3057.4% |
| 2000 | 0.00x | $241.00K | $95.93 Million | ▼ -40.2% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $408.00K | $97.19 Million | ▲ +107.5% |
| 1998 | -0.06x | $-5.60 Million | $100.30 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 1997 | -0.07x | $-6.50 Million | $88.70 Million | ▼ -436.3% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-1.10 Million | $80.50 Million | ▲ +97.4% |
| 1995 | -0.53x | $-2.60 Million | $4.90 Million | ▼ -231.3% |
| 1994 | -0.16x | $-3.70 Million | $23.10 Million | ▼ -279.5% |
| 1993 | -0.04x | $-2.30 Million | $54.50 Million | ▲ +68.7% |
| 1992 | -0.13x | $-2.10 Million | $15.60 Million | — |