Houston American Energy Corporation (HUSA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Houston American Energy Corporation (HUSA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.79 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.34 Million) in one year. See how much free cash does Houston American Energy Corporation generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Houston American Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Houston American Energy Corporation across 24 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Houston American Energy Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Houston American Energy Corporation (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Houston American Energy Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see HUSA market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -7.86x | $-1.54 Million | $195.49K | ▼ -1244.1% |
| 2023 | 0.69x | $263.19K | $383.10K | ▲ +224.3% |
| 2022 | -0.55x | $-228.96K | $414.31K | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2021 | -1.61x | $-680.69K | $421.91K | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2020 | -2.14x | $-864.79K | $403.45K | ▼ -263.5% |
| 2019 | -0.59x | $-725.02K | $1.23 Million | ▼ -123.8% |
| 2018 | 2.48x | $360.79K | $145.48K | ▲ +134.2% |
| 2017 | -7.26x | $-1.72 Million | $236.56K | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2016 | -14.65x | $-1.30 Million | $88.57K | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2015 | -28.38x | $-1.84 Million | $64.77K | ▼ -15069.6% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | $-1.75 Million | $9.34 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2013 | -0.43x | $-103.43K | $238.06K | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2012 | -0.49x | $-2.62 Million | $5.31 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2011 | -13.55x | $-4.63 Million | $342.01K | ▼ -935.2% |
| 2010 | 1.62x | $8.29 Million | $5.11 Million | ▲ +373.6% |
| 2009 | -0.59x | $-484.68K | $817.52K | ▼ -164.9% |
| 2008 | 0.91x | $1.45 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2007 | 3.82x | $1.80 Million | $471.35K | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2006 | 2.17x | $1.24 Million | $571.10K | ▲ +1251.2% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $694.58K | $4.32 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $298.00K | $1.28 Million | ▲ +263.7% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | $-153.70K | $1.08 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2002 | -0.12x | $-157.37K | $1.28 Million | ▼ -1717.2% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $8.39K | $1.11 Million | — |