Houston American Energy Corporation (HUSA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Houston American Energy Corporation (HUSA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.79 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.34 Million) in one year. See Houston American Energy Corporation financial flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Houston American Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Houston American Energy Corporation across 24 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Houston American Energy Corporation cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Houston American Energy Corporation (2001–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Houston American Energy Corporation. Check Houston American Energy Corporation (HUSA) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -7.86x | $-1.54 Million | $195.49K | ▼ -1244.1% |
| 2023 | 0.69x | $263.19K | $383.10K | ▲ +224.3% |
| 2022 | -0.55x | $-228.96K | $414.31K | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2021 | -1.61x | $-680.69K | $421.91K | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2020 | -2.14x | $-864.79K | $403.45K | ▼ -263.5% |
| 2019 | -0.59x | $-725.02K | $1.23 Million | ▼ -123.8% |
| 2018 | 2.48x | $360.79K | $145.48K | ▲ +134.2% |
| 2017 | -7.26x | $-1.72 Million | $236.56K | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2016 | -14.65x | $-1.30 Million | $88.57K | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2015 | -28.38x | $-1.84 Million | $64.77K | ▼ -15069.6% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | $-1.75 Million | $9.34 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2013 | -0.43x | $-103.43K | $238.06K | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2012 | -0.49x | $-2.62 Million | $5.31 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2011 | -13.55x | $-4.63 Million | $342.01K | ▼ -935.2% |
| 2010 | 1.62x | $8.29 Million | $5.11 Million | ▲ +373.6% |
| 2009 | -0.59x | $-484.68K | $817.52K | ▼ -164.9% |
| 2008 | 0.91x | $1.45 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2007 | 3.82x | $1.80 Million | $471.35K | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2006 | 2.17x | $1.24 Million | $571.10K | ▲ +1251.2% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $694.58K | $4.32 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $298.00K | $1.28 Million | ▲ +263.7% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | $-153.70K | $1.08 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2002 | -0.12x | $-157.37K | $1.28 Million | ▼ -1717.2% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $8.39K | $1.11 Million | — |