Houston American Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Houston American Energy Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Houston American Energy Corporation (HUSA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.79 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.34 Million) in one year. Check HUSA total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Houston American Energy Corporation (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Houston American Energy Corporation from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Houston American Energy Corporation across 24 annual periods. Check cash flow quality index of Houston American Energy Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Houston American Energy Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Houston American Energy Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Houston American Energy Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Houston American Energy Corporation (HUSA) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -7.86x | $-1.54 Million | $195.49K | ▼ -1244.1% |
| 2023 | 0.69x | $263.19K | $383.10K | ▲ +224.3% |
| 2022 | -0.55x | $-228.96K | $414.31K | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2021 | -1.61x | $-680.69K | $421.91K | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2020 | -2.14x | $-864.79K | $403.45K | ▼ -263.5% |
| 2019 | -0.59x | $-725.02K | $1.23 Million | ▼ -123.8% |
| 2018 | 2.48x | $360.79K | $145.48K | ▲ +134.2% |
| 2017 | -7.26x | $-1.72 Million | $236.56K | ▲ +50.4% |
| 2016 | -14.65x | $-1.30 Million | $88.57K | ▲ +48.4% |
| 2015 | -28.38x | $-1.84 Million | $64.77K | ▼ -15069.6% |
| 2014 | -0.19x | $-1.75 Million | $9.34 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2013 | -0.43x | $-103.43K | $238.06K | ▲ +12.0% |
| 2012 | -0.49x | $-2.62 Million | $5.31 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2011 | -13.55x | $-4.63 Million | $342.01K | ▼ -935.2% |
| 2010 | 1.62x | $8.29 Million | $5.11 Million | ▲ +373.6% |
| 2009 | -0.59x | $-484.68K | $817.52K | ▼ -164.9% |
| 2008 | 0.91x | $1.45 Million | $1.59 Million | ▼ -76.1% |
| 2007 | 3.82x | $1.80 Million | $471.35K | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2006 | 2.17x | $1.24 Million | $571.10K | ▲ +1251.2% |
| 2005 | 0.16x | $694.58K | $4.32 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $298.00K | $1.28 Million | ▲ +263.7% |
| 2003 | -0.14x | $-153.70K | $1.08 Million | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2002 | -0.12x | $-157.37K | $1.28 Million | ▼ -1717.2% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $8.39K | $1.11 Million | — |